Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DO NOT REVIEW] [ experiment #8614] using "." for fully qualified names: stdlib.pure.ospaths #8635

Closed

Conversation

timotheecour
Copy link
Member

@timotheecour timotheecour commented Aug 14, 2018

PR only there for debugging CI issues in #8614

  • this variant uses "stdlib.pure.ospaths" instead of "stdlib@pure@ospaths"
  • it generates package parents hierachically, exactly as follows:
    module ospaths -> package stdlib.pure (note: fully qualified) => package stdlib

files like these will be generated in nimcache:

stdlib.pure.bitops.c
stdlib.pure.math.c
stdlib.system.c
timn.bugs.exp_module_nonuniq.t01.c

Note

example of things it generates during compilation (with --hint[CC]=on):
CC: stdlib.pure.collections.rtarrays
CC: stdlib.std.sha1
CC: compiler.compiler.prefixmatches
CC: stdlib.pure.concurrency.cpuinfo
CC: stdlib.impure.nre.private.util
CC: stdlib.impure.nre
CC: stdlib.deprecated.pure.asyncio
CC: stdlib.system

depends on:

#8631

@timotheecour timotheecour changed the title [DO NOT REVIEW] [DO NOT REVIEW] [ experiment #8614] using "." for fully qualified names: stdlib.pure.ospaths Aug 14, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant