Combine non-atree domain payloads into atree payloads

[fxamacker]

Why

We can reduce memory, storage use, etc. by combining non-atree domain registers into 1 atree payload per account. We can further reduce execution state size by using atree register inlining feature added in Atree v0.8.0.

This improvement can be deployed via HCU and implements first on-the-fly migration to avoid causing further downtime.

The full impact on memory reduction (TBD) will be realized after all the accounts eventually migrate all their non-atree domain registers to a single combined atree payload per account.

NOTE: Memory reduction is only 1 benefit from reducing payload count.

How will we measure success ?

After all the non-atree domain registers are migrated to 1 atree map per account:

• reduce payload count by 20-30% (by combining payloads)
• reduce mtrie nodes by 20-30% (by eliminating mtrie nodes)
• reduce execution state size by 10-12% (~40GB as of Sept. 2024 mainnet state)
• reduce EN memory use by TBD (usually better than state size reduction)
• Less network bandwidth needed for chunk data packs

Requires HCU.
If we use on-the-fly migration, then the full impact won't be realized until all accounts are migrated.

Requires "cleanup" migration for accounts that were not migrated on-the-fly.

Estimate

~3dev/weeks to get ready for deployment.

DACI

Role	Assigned
Driver	Technical: @fxamacker , EM: @j1010001
Approver	@dete
Consulted	@ramtinms, @zhangchiqing, @turbolent
Informed	Flow engineering team, Product team: @vishalchangrani, Marketing: @SeanRobb

Details

New domains were added in Cadence 1.0 and domain register count increased to 150 million (was 80 million on Sept. 4 pre-spork). Each 8-byte domain register also requires ~2 mtrie nodes (~2x96 byte overhead).

Nearly 25% of total payloads are 8-byte domain registers.

These 8-byte "domain registers" refers to 8-byte account domain payloads. They are not atree payloads.

As of Sept 10, 2024, mainnet state had:

• total payload count: 610 million
• atree payload count: 324,800,993
• domain register (aka payload) count: 150,127,970
• etc.

Suggestion

Currently, all 150+ million account domain registers are not using atree.

I think we should replace non-atree domain registers with 1 atree register (atree map) per account. Currently, there are 35 million accounts.

Also, we can use atree inlining to inline small domain data. So instead of reducing payload count from 150 million to 35 million, we can reduce payload count by 174 million.

DRAFT Estimates

Based on preliminary estimates using Sept. 17, 2024 mainnet state, I think we can:

• eliminate mtrie nodes: -425 million (-28.5%)
• reduce payload count: -174 million (-28.5%)
• reduce register reads (inlined domain data)
• reduce state size by ~40GB (roughly 10-12% of state size)
• reduce peak RAM use by TBD (usually better than state size)
• provide single point of entry for account data

We can reduce payload count by 28% (instead of being limited to 24%) due to atree inlining.

Misc

This issue replaces my older issue #2867.

EDIT: add DRAFT estimates and mention why we can reduce 174 million payload count if there are only 150 million domain registers.

Effort Estimation

2dev/weeks to wrap-up testing and open PR for review. Will need @turbolent to review.

[fxamacker]

I was asked about impact of this, so I used mainnet state (Sept. 17 checkpoint) to create DRAFT estimates:

• eliminate mtrie nodes: -425 million (-28.5%)
• reduce payload count: -174 million (-28.5%)
• reduce register reads (inlined domain data)
• reduce state size -40GB and peak RAM by more
• provide single point of entry for account data

We can reduce payload count by 28% (instead of being limited to 24%) due to atree inlining.

Reduction in payload count and mtrie nodes isn't as big as atree v.0.8.0 (Sept. 4, 2024) but goals are similar.

In general, benefits from reducing payload counts and eliminating mtrie nodes include:

• Slow down growth rate of execution state.
• Reduce peak RAM use on execution nodes.
• Reduce SSD storage use (e.g. checkpoint file sizes).
• Speedup network upgrades (e.g. future migrations processing fewer payloads).
• Future efficiency of other servers, components, databases (files/cache/index), etc. that benefit from fewer payloads.

Each coding change can't always eliminate 1 billion mtrie nodes, but smaller reductions can eventually become greater.

[bluesign]

it seems like there is also 140M registers ( ~ 4 per account ) used by flow-go, ( account status, keys etc ) maybe it can be good to consider them also. Would be nice to migrate everything to atree. ( as flow-go now uses atree anyway for EVM stuff )

[fxamacker]

it seems like there is also 140M registers ( ~ 4 per account ) used by flow-go, ( account status, keys etc ) maybe it can be good to consider them also.

Yes, definitely worth considering! 👍

[fxamacker]

I replaced text promising 25% reduction of EN memory (that estimate isn't from me).

Payload count can be reduced by 20-30% by combining their content, so their content is not lost. However, we can safely eliminate 20-30% of mtrie nodes (96 bytes each).

Note

If we use on-the-fly migration, then the full impact won't be realized until all accounts are eventually migrated.

Unless we do a full migration, we won't immediately see the full benefits.

After all the non-atree domain registers are migrated, we should get:

• reduced payload count by 20-30%
• reduced mtrie count by 20-30%
• reduced execution state size by roughly 40GB (given Sept. 2024 mainnet state size)
• reduced EN memory use by TBD (usually more than state size reduction)

While at it, I listed other benefits (memory reduction is only 1 benefit). Also, more than EN can benefit when we reduce state size by reducing payload counts, etc.