Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

rename everything #2

Closed
ompiteam opened this issue Sep 12, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

rename everything #2

ompiteam opened this issue Sep 12, 2014 · 3 comments
Assignees
@bgoglin
Labels
blocker bug
Milestone
v0.9.1

Comments

@ompiteam
Copy link
Contributor

rename topo_* into hwloc_*, libtopology into libhwloc, etc.
@ompiteam
Copy link
Contributor Author

Imported from trac issue 1. Created by sthibaul on 2009-09-09T11:16:48, last modified: 2009-09-19T18:56:05

@ompiteam ompiteam added this to the v0.9.1 milestone Sep 12, 2014
@ompiteam
Copy link
Contributor Author

Trac comment by sthibaul on 2009-09-09 11:19:28:

(In [895]) turned into trac ticket
Refs #1

@ompiteam
Copy link
Contributor Author

Trac comment by bgoglin on 2009-09-19 18:56:05:

should be done now

@ompiteam ompiteam mentioned this issue Sep 12, 2014
Closed
NicolasDenoyelle pushed a commit to NicolasDenoyelle/dynamic_lstopo that referenced this issue Dec 11, 2014
@bgoglin
synthetic: allow to specify indexes as interleaving loops
39e7ae3 
indexes=8*2:4*2 specifies that we nest 2 interleaving loops:
one loop with 2 steps with 8 between each,
then one loop with 2 steps with 4 between each.
PU#0 and open-mpi#1 will be 8 PU away, and PU#0 and open-mpi#2 will be 4 PU away.
@chenlcl chenlcl mentioned this issue Aug 24, 2017
Closed
@outpaddling outpaddling mentioned this issue Jan 14, 2018
Closed
@oldmanul oldmanul mentioned this issue Feb 14, 2018
Closed
bgoglin added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 16, 2018
@bgoglin
x86: use the number of existing CPUs instead of only online ones
4b57be6 
On a 4-core machine with #2 offline, we want x86 to look at all 4 cores,
so that we get info for all online ones (#1, #3 and #4).
Before this commit, x86 would only look at the 3 first ones
(just like if the offline PUs were always at the end of the range).

At least Linux and Solaris can put some CPUs offline in the middle of the index range.
So ask hwloc_fallback_nbprocessors() to get the number of existing CPUs.

Signed-off-by: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
@cponder cponder mentioned this issue May 7, 2018
Closed
@fozog fozog mentioned this issue Apr 12, 2021
Closed
@W-Wuxian W-Wuxian mentioned this issue Dec 5, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@bgoglin bgoglin

Labels
blocker bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.9.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bgoglin @ompiteam