Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

redesign: add all dimens #123

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2020
Merged

redesign: add all dimens #123

merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2020

Conversation

laxyapahuja
Copy link

Description

I've noticed that there are similarities in dimens additions in #119, #117, #112, #110 etc. To avoid merge conflicts, I've compiled all additions into one PR. The dimens additions from all PRs can be removed after this PR gets merged.

  • Run the unit tests with ./gradlew check to make sure you didn't break anything

  • If you have multiple commits please combine them into one commit by squashing them.

@rchtgpt
Copy link
Member

rchtgpt commented Jan 26, 2020

@luckyman20 all the negative dimensions are used for the bottom margin of CardView. I think it should be uniform for all the cards. Can you tell which dimension out of the three(-50,-40 and -30) should be used?

@luckyman20
Copy link
Collaborator

@Rachittt Can you please post screenshot for all 3? It would help me in accessing it better.

@rchtgpt
Copy link
Member

rchtgpt commented Jan 27, 2020

@luckyman20 Check the screenshots in the following PRs:
-30dp -> #112
-40dp -> #115
-50dp -> #118
we are using negative dimension to hide the corner radius of the CardView

@luckyman20
Copy link
Collaborator

@Rachittt -40dp looks good to me.

Copy link
Collaborator

@luckyman20 luckyman20 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @laxyapahuja

@luckyman20 luckyman20 merged commit e95d51f into openMF:redesign May 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants