Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Bug 1942686: Extend trunk configuration to port level in machineset #176

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

adduarte
Copy link

With the introduction of new technologies, like SR-IOV,
it is required that the user have the ability to
configure trunked and not-trunked ports for the same machines.

With the introduction of new technologies, like SR-IOV,
it is required that the user have the ability to
configured trunked and not-trunked ports for the same machines.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 16, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask for approval from adduarte after the PR has been reviewed.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@adduarte: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942686, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (gpei@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

[WIP] Bug 1942686: Extend trunk configuration to port level in machineset

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 16, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 16, 2021

@adduarte: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/gofmt 961e021 link /test gofmt

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@iamemilio
Copy link

you will have to extend the trunk create logic to the ports here as well. Currently they dont ever get trunked

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 20, 2021
@mandre
Copy link
Member

mandre commented Jul 23, 2021

Closed in favor or #185

@mandre mandre closed this Jul 23, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 23, 2021

@adduarte: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1942686. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

[WIP] Bug 1942686: Extend trunk configuration to port level in machineset

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mdbooth mdbooth deleted the BZ_1942686 branch April 6, 2022 15:56
pierreprinetti pushed a commit to shiftstack/cluster-api-provider-openstack that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
Not all the scenarios supported by CAPO require the manager to pull the
kubeconfig configs from the nodes. Rather than failing due to missing
ssh keys, we should just log the inability to pull the config file and
continue with the execution.

This is an interim solution until openshift#174 is resolved.

Related to openshift#175
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants