Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-45189, OCPBUGS-45182: e2e/openstack: adjustments for missing manila apps & pods #5202

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

EmilienM
Copy link
Member

@EmilienM EmilienM commented Nov 29, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 29, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@EmilienM: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45189, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.19.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (rlobillo@redhat.com), skipping review request.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

What this PR does / why we need it:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 29, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from hasueki and sjenning November 29, 2024 00:41
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added area/testing Indicates the PR includes changes for e2e testing and removed do-not-merge/needs-area labels Nov 29, 2024
@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

/cherry-pick release-4.18

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@EmilienM: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.18 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

/test e2e-openstack

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

Combined with openshift/csi-operator#334, this might remove all errors we have now on e2e-openstack.

@jparrill
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/retest

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 29, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: EmilienM, jparrill

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 29, 2024
@MaysaMacedo
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 29, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0d9e89f and 2 for PR HEAD f013a20 in total

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

/testwith openshift/hypershift/main/e2e-openstack openshift/csi-operator#334

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

{  inspect of image "image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/ci-op-vrpllnfx/pipeline:smb-csi-driver-operator-test-openshift.csi-operator-amd64" failed with error: failed to copy: httpReadSeeker: failed open: unexpected status code https://image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/v2/ci-op-vrpllnfx/pipeline/blobs/sha256:aa7e9776448f15b93baa80debd74fab8f0198ff63d33c1f4c150edbbe14c96e5: 500 Internal Server Error}

infra error?

/testwith openshift/hypershift/main/e2e-openstack openshift/csi-operator#334

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

/testwith openshift/hypershift/main/e2e-openstack openshift/csi-operator#334

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 428154d and 1 for PR HEAD f013a20 in total

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

/test hypershift-operator-main-on-pull-request

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 29, 2024

@EmilienM: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test e2e-aws
/test e2e-aws-4-18
/test e2e-aws-upgrade-hypershift-operator
/test e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced
/test images
/test security
/test unit
/test verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test e2e-aks
/test e2e-aws-metrics
/test e2e-azure-aks-ovn-conformance
/test e2e-conformance
/test e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn
/test e2e-kubevirt-azure-ovn
/test e2e-kubevirt-metal-conformance
/test e2e-openstack
/test e2e-openstack-conformance
/test e2e-openstack-csi-cinder
/test e2e-openstack-csi-manila
/test e2e-openstack-nfv
/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
/test okd-scos-images

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-aks
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-aws
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-aws-4-18
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-aws-upgrade-hypershift-operator
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-images
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-security
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-unit
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-verify

In response to this:

/test hypershift-operator-main-on-pull-request

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 88dee78 and 0 for PR HEAD f013a20 in total

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 3, 2024
@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

EmilienM commented Dec 3, 2024

/test e2e-aws-4-18

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

EmilienM commented Dec 3, 2024

/test e2e-aws-4-17

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2024

@EmilienM: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test e2e-aws
/test e2e-aws-4-18
/test e2e-aws-upgrade-hypershift-operator
/test e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced
/test images
/test security
/test unit
/test verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test e2e-aks
/test e2e-aws-metrics
/test e2e-azure-aks-ovn-conformance
/test e2e-conformance
/test e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn
/test e2e-kubevirt-azure-ovn
/test e2e-kubevirt-metal-conformance
/test e2e-openstack
/test e2e-openstack-conformance
/test e2e-openstack-csi-cinder
/test e2e-openstack-csi-manila
/test e2e-openstack-nfv
/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
/test okd-scos-images

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-aws
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-aws-4-18
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-aws-upgrade-hypershift-operator
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-images
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-security
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-unit
pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-verify

In response to this:

/test e2e-aws-4-17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@csrwng
Copy link
Contributor

csrwng commented Dec 3, 2024

/override Red Hat Konflux

@csrwng
Copy link
Contributor

csrwng commented Dec 3, 2024

/override "Red Hat Konflux"

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2024

@csrwng: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • Hat
  • Konflux
  • Red

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • ci/prow/e2e-aks
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-4-18
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade-hypershift-operator
  • ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced
  • ci/prow/e2e-openstack
  • ci/prow/images
  • ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
  • ci/prow/security
  • ci/prow/unit
  • ci/prow/verify
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-aks
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-aws
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-aws-4-18
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-aws-upgrade-hypershift-operator
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-openstack
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-security
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-verify
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

In response to this:

/override Red Hat Konflux

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2024

@csrwng: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • Red Hat Konflux

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • ci/prow/e2e-aks
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-4-18
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade-hypershift-operator
  • ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced
  • ci/prow/e2e-openstack
  • ci/prow/images
  • ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
  • ci/prow/security
  • ci/prow/unit
  • ci/prow/verify
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-aks
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-aws
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-aws-4-18
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-aws-upgrade-hypershift-operator
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-openstack
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-security
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-verify
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

In response to this:

/override "Red Hat Konflux"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@csrwng
Copy link
Contributor

csrwng commented Dec 3, 2024

/override tide

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2024

@csrwng: Overrode contexts on behalf of csrwng: tide

In response to this:

/override tide

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

EmilienM commented Dec 4, 2024

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e9fec4b and 2 for PR HEAD d4fa74f in total

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e9fec4b and 2 for PR HEAD d4fa74f in total

@bryan-cox
Copy link
Member

/override ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2024

@bryan-cox: Overrode contexts on behalf of bryan-cox: ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@csrwng
Copy link
Contributor

csrwng commented Dec 4, 2024

/override ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced

1 similar comment
@bryan-cox
Copy link
Member

/override ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2024

@csrwng: Overrode contexts on behalf of csrwng: ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2024

@bryan-cox: Overrode contexts on behalf of bryan-cox: ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

EmilienM commented Dec 4, 2024

Not mergeable. Retesting 7 jobs.

😭

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

EmilienM commented Dec 5, 2024

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 857ccab and 2 for PR HEAD d4fa74f in total

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2024

@EmilienM: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-4-17 f013a20 link true /test e2e-aws-4-17
ci/prow/e2e-aks d4fa74f link false /test e2e-aks
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn d4fa74f link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 443bf28 into openshift:main Dec 5, 2024
12 of 14 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@EmilienM: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45189 is in an unrecognized state (Verified) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45182: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45182 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

What this PR does / why we need it:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@EmilienM: new pull request created: #5236

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/testing Indicates the PR includes changes for e2e testing jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants