Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG 1858400: [Performance] Lease refresh period for machine-api-controllers is too high, causes heavy writes to etcd at idle #649

Merged

Conversation

The machine-api-controller components are refreshing their lease more
than all other components combined. Bringing this to 90s each, will
decrease etcd writes at idle.
The machine-api-controller components are refreshing their lease more
than all other components combined. Bringing this to 90s each, will
decrease etcd writes at idle.
The machine-api-controller components are refreshing their lease more
than all other components combined. Bringing this to 90s each, will
decrease etcd writes at idle.
The machine-api-controller components are refreshing their lease more
than all other components combined. Bringing this to 90s each, will
decrease etcd writes at idle.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 20, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Danil-Grigorev: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1858400, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

BUG 1858400: [Performance] Lease refresh period for machine-api-controllers is too high, causes heavy writes to etcd at idle

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Danil-Grigorev: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1858400, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

BUG 1858400: [Performance] Lease refresh period for machine-api-controllers is too high, causes heavy writes to etcd at idle

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@enxebre
Copy link
Member

enxebre commented Jul 20, 2020

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: enxebre

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 20, 2020
@enxebre
Copy link
Member

enxebre commented Jul 20, 2020

@Danil-Grigorev can we also please enforce this via https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-operator/blob/master/pkg/operator/sync.go#L425
Setting defaults is sane but let’s enforce our opinions on mao.

@Danil-Grigorev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Danil-Grigorev can we also please enforce this via https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-operator/blob/master/pkg/operator/sync.go#L425
Setting defaults is sane but let’s enforce our opinions on mao.

Agree, this will help when MAO will be revendored in providers next time - 828c453

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 20, 2020
@@ -423,6 +423,7 @@ func newContainers(config *OperatorConfig, features map[string]bool) []corev1.Co
"--logtostderr=true",
"--v=3",
"--leader-elect=true",
"-leader-elect-lease-duration=90s",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why only one dash here while any other command has --?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy pasting from CLI is an unhealthy habit 😅Even when it works both ways, will fix in a second

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@enxebre
Copy link
Member

enxebre commented Jul 20, 2020

/hold
#649 (comment) so there's no change to merge by accident as it has both labels now.
@Danil-Grigorev please feel free to unhold after addressing the comment above.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 20, 2020
Enforce this value in MAO deployment will ensure the value won't
be overritten by changed CLI defaults in the future.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 20, 2020
@elmiko
Copy link
Contributor

elmiko commented Jul 20, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 20, 2020
@Danil-Grigorev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 20, 2020
@Danil-Grigorev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 20, 2020

@Danil-Grigorev: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure-operator 761bcd5 link /test e2e-azure-operator

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4a04d20 into openshift:master Jul 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Danil-Grigorev: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/machine-api-operator#649, openshift/cluster-api-provider-ovirt#56. The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

In response to this:

BUG 1858400: [Performance] Lease refresh period for machine-api-controllers is too high, causes heavy writes to etcd at idle

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants