-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
configs/installer: increase the resource limits for all image builds #3588
configs/installer: increase the resource limits for all image builds #3588
Conversation
With addition of azure terraform plugins, looks like the installer builds are failing because of OOMKilled [1] [1]: https://openshift-gce-devel.appspot.com/build/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_installer/1664/pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-images/4034#operator-build-image-installer-from-the-repository
Is it valid to add limits to builds? @smarterclayton @bparees |
the build api supports it, if that's what you're asking. whatever you put here: will be translated onto the build pod that's created. |
Memory limits yes, helps ensure the correct thing gets oomkilled. Something is going to die, we want it to be guy who went bad |
|
requests: | ||
cpu: "3" | ||
memory: 5Gi | ||
upi-installer: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
using it similar to unit
Yup, although I'd be surprised if wee needed 5 GiB memory for our unit tests. And I'm still not clear how these are supposed to work, but I worry that this line is getting limits/requests for our UPI jobs (which are probably fine already) instead of for the compilation job that the UPI tests depend on. Does the CI output show this worked?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does the CI output show this worked?
yes the build jobs for rehearse had the correct resource requests/limits for build pods.
@abhinavdahiya: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya, wking The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@abhinavdahiya: Updated the following 2 configmaps:
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
With addition of azure terraform plugins 1, looks like the installer builds are failing because of OOMKilled 2
/cc @wking @staebler