Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix a race condition in dsl_dataset_sync() when activating features #13816

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2023

Conversation

gamanakis
Copy link
Contributor

@gamanakis gamanakis commented Aug 30, 2022

Motivation and Context

See commits 80a650b, 9f346ab

Description

The zio returned from arc_write() in dmu_objset_sync() uses
zio_nowait(). However we may reach the end of dsl_dataset_sync()
which checks if we need to activate features in the filesystem
without knowing if that zio has even run through the ZIO pipeline yet.
In that case we will flag features to be activated in
dsl_dataset_block_born() but dsl_dataset_sync() has already
completed its run and those features will not actually be activated.
Mitigate this by moving the feature activation code in
dsl_dataset_sync_done(). Also add new ASSERTs in
dsl_scan_visitbp() checking if a block contradicts any filesystem
flags.

How Has This Been Tested?

Added ASSERTs in dsl_scan_visitbp() and running zloop.sh.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Library ABI change (libzfs, libzfs_core, libnvpair, libuutil and libzfsbootenv)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

@gamanakis gamanakis marked this pull request as ready for review August 31, 2022 19:12
@behlendorf behlendorf added the Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing label Sep 2, 2022
module/zfs/dmu_objset.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bwatkinson bwatkinson requested a review from ahrens September 6, 2022 23:24
@gamanakis gamanakis force-pushed the feature_race branch 2 times, most recently from a70e797 to 9a1c7e7 Compare November 19, 2022 15:21
@gamanakis
Copy link
Contributor Author

9a1c7e7 : Rebased to master.

@jumbi77
Copy link
Contributor

jumbi77 commented Jan 28, 2023

Politely ping @ahrens for a review?

@gamanakis gamanakis force-pushed the feature_race branch 3 times, most recently from 3b7fc66 to 54c068b Compare February 1, 2023 13:47
@gamanakis
Copy link
Contributor Author

54c068b: Rebased to master, implemented @ahrens suggestion.

@behlendorf behlendorf added Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) and removed Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing labels Feb 1, 2023
module/zfs/dsl_dataset.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
module/zfs/dsl_scan.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@gamanakis
Copy link
Contributor Author

gamanakis commented Feb 2, 2023

a55b09f: Implemented suggestions by @freqlabs

The zio returned from arc_write() in dmu_objset_sync() uses
zio_nowait(). However we may reach the end of dsl_dataset_sync()
which checks if we need to activate features in the filesystem
without knowing if that zio has even run through the ZIO pipeline yet.
In that case we will flag features to be activated in
dsl_dataset_block_born() but dsl_dataset_sync() has already
completed its run and those features will not actually be activated.
Mitigate this by moving the feature activation code in
dsl_dataset_sync_done(). Also add new ASSERTs in
dsl_scan_visitbp() checking if a block contradicts any filesystem
flags.

Signed-off-by: George Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com>
@behlendorf behlendorf merged commit 34ce4c4 into openzfs:master Feb 14, 2023
@gamanakis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tonyhutter I strongly think that this PR along with #14502 and #14523 should be included in 2.1.10. Thank you.

@behlendorf
Copy link
Contributor

@gamanakis would you mind opening a PR against the 2.1.10-staging branch with the needed changes so we can make sure they get included.

gamanakis added a commit to gamanakis/zfs that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2023
The zio returned from arc_write() in dmu_objset_sync() uses
zio_nowait(). However we may reach the end of dsl_dataset_sync()
which checks if we need to activate features in the filesystem
without knowing if that zio has even run through the ZIO pipeline yet.
In that case we will flag features to be activated in
dsl_dataset_block_born() but dsl_dataset_sync() has already
completed its run and those features will not actually be activated.
Mitigate this by moving the feature activation code in
dsl_dataset_sync_done(). Also add new ASSERTs in
dsl_scan_visitbp() checking if a block contradicts any filesystem
flags.

Reviewed-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: George Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com>
Closes openzfs#13816
@gamanakis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@behlendorf, done! #14537

behlendorf pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2023
The zio returned from arc_write() in dmu_objset_sync() uses
zio_nowait(). However we may reach the end of dsl_dataset_sync()
which checks if we need to activate features in the filesystem
without knowing if that zio has even run through the ZIO pipeline yet.
In that case we will flag features to be activated in
dsl_dataset_block_born() but dsl_dataset_sync() has already
completed its run and those features will not actually be activated.
Mitigate this by moving the feature activation code in
dsl_dataset_sync_done(). Also add new ASSERTs in
dsl_scan_visitbp() checking if a block contradicts any filesystem
flags.

Reviewed-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: George Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com>
Closes #13816
lundman pushed a commit to openzfsonwindows/openzfs that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2023
The zio returned from arc_write() in dmu_objset_sync() uses
zio_nowait(). However we may reach the end of dsl_dataset_sync()
which checks if we need to activate features in the filesystem
without knowing if that zio has even run through the ZIO pipeline yet.
In that case we will flag features to be activated in
dsl_dataset_block_born() but dsl_dataset_sync() has already
completed its run and those features will not actually be activated.
Mitigate this by moving the feature activation code in
dsl_dataset_sync_done(). Also add new ASSERTs in
dsl_scan_visitbp() checking if a block contradicts any filesystem
flags.

Reviewed-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: George Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com>
Closes openzfs#13816
gamanakis added a commit to gamanakis/zfs that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2023
The zio returned from arc_write() in dmu_objset_sync() uses
zio_nowait(). However we may reach the end of dsl_dataset_sync()
which checks if we need to activate features in the filesystem
without knowing if that zio has even run through the ZIO pipeline yet.
In that case we will flag features to be activated in
dsl_dataset_block_born() but dsl_dataset_sync() has already
completed its run and those features will not actually be activated.
Mitigate this by moving the feature activation code in
dsl_dataset_sync_done(). Also add new ASSERTs in
dsl_scan_visitbp() checking if a block contradicts any filesystem
flags.

Reviewed-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: George Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com>
Closes openzfs#13816
datacore-rm pushed a commit to DataCoreSoftware/openzfs that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2024
The zio returned from arc_write() in dmu_objset_sync() uses
zio_nowait(). However we may reach the end of dsl_dataset_sync()
which checks if we need to activate features in the filesystem
without knowing if that zio has even run through the ZIO pipeline yet.
In that case we will flag features to be activated in
dsl_dataset_block_born() but dsl_dataset_sync() has already
completed its run and those features will not actually be activated.
Mitigate this by moving the feature activation code in
dsl_dataset_sync_done(). Also add new ASSERTs in
dsl_scan_visitbp() checking if a block contradicts any filesystem
flags.

Reviewed-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: George Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com>
Closes openzfs#13816
datacore-rm pushed a commit to DataCoreSoftware/openzfs that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2024
The zio returned from arc_write() in dmu_objset_sync() uses
zio_nowait(). However we may reach the end of dsl_dataset_sync()
which checks if we need to activate features in the filesystem
without knowing if that zio has even run through the ZIO pipeline yet.
In that case we will flag features to be activated in
dsl_dataset_block_born() but dsl_dataset_sync() has already
completed its run and those features will not actually be activated.
Mitigate this by moving the feature activation code in
dsl_dataset_sync_done(). Also add new ASSERTs in
dsl_scan_visitbp() checking if a block contradicts any filesystem
flags.

Reviewed-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: George Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com>
Closes openzfs#13816
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants