Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

zfs 2.1.10 fixes #14537

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 1, 2023
Merged

Conversation

gamanakis
Copy link
Contributor

@gamanakis gamanakis commented Feb 27, 2023

Motivation and Context

Merge upstream fixes related to activating features into 2.1.10.

Description

How Has This Been Tested?

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Library ABI change (libzfs, libzfs_core, libnvpair, libuutil and libzfsbootenv)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

The zio returned from arc_write() in dmu_objset_sync() uses
zio_nowait(). However we may reach the end of dsl_dataset_sync()
which checks if we need to activate features in the filesystem
without knowing if that zio has even run through the ZIO pipeline yet.
In that case we will flag features to be activated in
dsl_dataset_block_born() but dsl_dataset_sync() has already
completed its run and those features will not actually be activated.
Mitigate this by moving the feature activation code in
dsl_dataset_sync_done(). Also add new ASSERTs in
dsl_scan_visitbp() checking if a block contradicts any filesystem
flags.

Reviewed-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: George Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com>
Closes openzfs#13816
With commit 34ce4c4 applied, there is no need for eee9362.
Revert that aside from the test. All tests introduced in those commits
pass.

Reviewed-by: Richard Yao <richard.yao@alumni.stonybrook.edu>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: George Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com>
Closes openzfs#14502
Otherwise the dataset may be freed after the last dmu_buf_rele() leading
to a panic.

Reviewed-by: Mark Maybee <mark.maybee@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by: George Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com>
Closes openzfs#14522
Closes openzfs#14523
@behlendorf behlendorf added the Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing label Feb 27, 2023
@gamanakis gamanakis marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2023 22:16
Signed-off-by: George Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com>
@behlendorf behlendorf added Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) and removed Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing labels Mar 1, 2023
@behlendorf behlendorf merged commit 7043742 into openzfs:zfs-2.1.10-staging Mar 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants