Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix concurrency issue in go test(x/lockup) #8765

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mattverse
Copy link
Member

Closes: #XXX

What is the purpose of the change

We have observed couple of failures in go tests, and this has been due to concurrency issues within testing.

This fix should fix the issues we have been facing.

Testing and Verifying

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

Documentation and Release Note

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature or user-facing behavior changes?
  • Changelog entry added to Unreleased section of CHANGELOG.md?

Where is the change documented?

  • Specification (x/{module}/README.md)
  • Osmosis documentation site
  • Code comments?
  • N/A

@mattverse mattverse added the V:state/compatible/no_backport State machine compatible PR, depends on prior breaks label Oct 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to the CHANGELOG.md for the Osmosis project, featuring new entries under the "Unreleased" section and specific version updates. It also modifies the genesis_test.go file by implementing better temporary directory handling and enhancing comments for clarity. These changes aim to improve the documentation of project updates and the reliability of the test suite.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Updated with new entries under "Unreleased" and specific version changes (v26.0.1, v26.0.0, v25.2.1, etc.). Categorized changes into features, improvements, and bug fixes.
x/lockup/keeper/genesis_test.go Modified TestMarshalUnmarshalGenesis for improved temporary directory handling and added comments for clarity. Updated TestExportGenesis to reflect new lock ID.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

V:state/compatible/backport, A:no-changelog

Suggested reviewers

  • PaddyMc

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
x/lockup/keeper/genesis_test.go (1)

171-186: Robust testing of genesis export and initialization.

The changes improve the test by:

  1. Adding descriptive comments for better readability.
  2. Testing the robustness of genesis export by removing the temporary directory.
  3. Using a fresh app instance for genesis initialization, ensuring a clean state.
  4. Verifying that no panic occurs during initialization.

These modifications enhance the test's effectiveness in validating the genesis functionality.

Consider adding an assertion to verify the state after genesis initialization, e.g., checking if the exported locks are correctly recreated in the new app instance.

CHANGELOG.md (6)

61-61: Consider adding more context to the band-aid state export fix.

The description "band-aid state export fix for cwpool gauges" is quite vague. It would be helpful to provide more details about the specific issue that was fixed and why it's considered a "band-aid" solution. This information would be valuable for users and developers trying to understand the impact of this change.


62-62: Clarify the impact of the IAVL version upgrade.

While upgrading IAVL is important, it would be beneficial to briefly mention the key improvements or fixes that come with this version upgrade. This helps users understand the significance of the change.


Line range hint 72-76: Consider grouping related API changes.

The API breaks section contains several related changes to the PoolModuleI interface and incentives module. Consider grouping these changes together for better readability and to highlight their relationship.


Line range hint 88-90: Consider elaborating on the performance improvement.

While the speedup of fractional exponentiation is noted, it would be helpful to provide some context on the impact of this improvement. For example, mentioning the typical use cases where this speedup will be noticeable or any benchmarks showing the improvement.


Line range hint 100-109: Consider grouping related API changes and providing migration guidance.

The API breaks section contains several related changes to the Concentrated Liquidity module. Consider grouping these changes together and providing brief guidance on how to migrate from the old API to the new one. This would be particularly helpful for developers who need to update their code.


Line range hint 110-112: Clarify the impact of the osmomath change.

The note about the change in Dec and Int initialization behavior is important. Consider adding a brief example or explanation of how this might affect existing code to help developers understand the potential impact and necessary adjustments.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0711797 and 7e2f3fd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • x/lockup/keeper/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
x/lockup/keeper/genesis_test.go (2)

147-153: Improved test isolation with temporary directory handling.

The addition of a unique temporary directory for each test run is a good practice. It enhances test isolation and prevents potential conflicts between concurrent test executions. The use of os.MkdirTemp and the deferred cleanup ensure proper resource management.


165-170: Enhanced code clarity with descriptive comments.

The addition of comments explaining the purpose of account funding and lock creation improves code readability. These operations are consistent with the test's objective of exporting and re-initializing genesis state.

CHANGELOG.md (4)

Line range hint 67-70: LGTM: Clear and concise feature descriptions.

The new features are well-described and provide clear information about the additions to the codebase. The pull request references are helpful for those who want to dive deeper into the changes.


Line range hint 80-86: LGTM: Well-documented features and improvements.

The features and improvements are clearly described with appropriate pull request references. The additions of new mathematical operations and query improvements are well-explained.


Line range hint 92-98: LGTM: Clear bug fixes with appropriate context.

The bug fixes are well-documented, providing clear information about the issues resolved and the changes made. The pull request references are helpful for further investigation if needed.


Line range hint 1-112: Overall, the CHANGELOG.md is well-maintained and informative.

The changelog provides a clear and structured overview of the changes in recent versions. The consistent use of pull request references is commendable and helps developers track the source of changes. While most entries are clear and concise, some could benefit from additional context or clarification, particularly regarding the impact of certain changes or API breaks.

Consider implementing the following improvements:

  1. Provide more context for vague descriptions (e.g., "band-aid" fixes).
  2. Group related API changes for better readability.
  3. Offer brief migration guidance for significant API breaks.
  4. Include more details on the impact of performance improvements.

These enhancements would make the changelog even more valuable for users and developers working with the Osmosis project.

Copy link
Collaborator

@PaddyMc PaddyMc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❤️

@PaddyMc PaddyMc merged commit 15021f2 into main Oct 10, 2024
1 check passed
@PaddyMc PaddyMc deleted the mattverse/fix-concurrent-test branch October 10, 2024 16:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:x/lockup V:state/compatible/no_backport State machine compatible PR, depends on prior breaks
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants