-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 592
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix concurrency issue in go test(x/lockup) #8765
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
x/lockup/keeper/genesis_test.go (1)
171-186
: Robust testing of genesis export and initialization.The changes improve the test by:
- Adding descriptive comments for better readability.
- Testing the robustness of genesis export by removing the temporary directory.
- Using a fresh app instance for genesis initialization, ensuring a clean state.
- Verifying that no panic occurs during initialization.
These modifications enhance the test's effectiveness in validating the genesis functionality.
Consider adding an assertion to verify the state after genesis initialization, e.g., checking if the exported locks are correctly recreated in the new app instance.
CHANGELOG.md (6)
61-61
: Consider adding more context to the band-aid state export fix.The description "band-aid state export fix for cwpool gauges" is quite vague. It would be helpful to provide more details about the specific issue that was fixed and why it's considered a "band-aid" solution. This information would be valuable for users and developers trying to understand the impact of this change.
62-62
: Clarify the impact of the IAVL version upgrade.While upgrading IAVL is important, it would be beneficial to briefly mention the key improvements or fixes that come with this version upgrade. This helps users understand the significance of the change.
Line range hint
72-76
: Consider grouping related API changes.The API breaks section contains several related changes to the PoolModuleI interface and incentives module. Consider grouping these changes together for better readability and to highlight their relationship.
Line range hint
88-90
: Consider elaborating on the performance improvement.While the speedup of fractional exponentiation is noted, it would be helpful to provide some context on the impact of this improvement. For example, mentioning the typical use cases where this speedup will be noticeable or any benchmarks showing the improvement.
Line range hint
100-109
: Consider grouping related API changes and providing migration guidance.The API breaks section contains several related changes to the Concentrated Liquidity module. Consider grouping these changes together and providing brief guidance on how to migrate from the old API to the new one. This would be particularly helpful for developers who need to update their code.
Line range hint
110-112
: Clarify the impact of the osmomath change.The note about the change in Dec and Int initialization behavior is important. Consider adding a brief example or explanation of how this might affect existing code to help developers understand the potential impact and necessary adjustments.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- x/lockup/keeper/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
x/lockup/keeper/genesis_test.go (2)
147-153
: Improved test isolation with temporary directory handling.The addition of a unique temporary directory for each test run is a good practice. It enhances test isolation and prevents potential conflicts between concurrent test executions. The use of
os.MkdirTemp
and the deferred cleanup ensure proper resource management.
165-170
: Enhanced code clarity with descriptive comments.The addition of comments explaining the purpose of account funding and lock creation improves code readability. These operations are consistent with the test's objective of exporting and re-initializing genesis state.
CHANGELOG.md (4)
Line range hint
67-70
: LGTM: Clear and concise feature descriptions.The new features are well-described and provide clear information about the additions to the codebase. The pull request references are helpful for those who want to dive deeper into the changes.
Line range hint
80-86
: LGTM: Well-documented features and improvements.The features and improvements are clearly described with appropriate pull request references. The additions of new mathematical operations and query improvements are well-explained.
Line range hint
92-98
: LGTM: Clear bug fixes with appropriate context.The bug fixes are well-documented, providing clear information about the issues resolved and the changes made. The pull request references are helpful for further investigation if needed.
Line range hint
1-112
: Overall, the CHANGELOG.md is well-maintained and informative.The changelog provides a clear and structured overview of the changes in recent versions. The consistent use of pull request references is commendable and helps developers track the source of changes. While most entries are clear and concise, some could benefit from additional context or clarification, particularly regarding the impact of certain changes or API breaks.
Consider implementing the following improvements:
- Provide more context for vague descriptions (e.g., "band-aid" fixes).
- Group related API changes for better readability.
- Offer brief migration guidance for significant API breaks.
- Include more details on the impact of performance improvements.
These enhancements would make the changelog even more valuable for users and developers working with the Osmosis project.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❤️
Closes: #XXX
What is the purpose of the change
We have observed couple of failures in go tests, and this has been due to concurrency issues within testing.
This fix should fix the issues we have been facing.
Testing and Verifying
This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
Documentation and Release Note
Unreleased
section ofCHANGELOG.md
?Where is the change documented?
x/{module}/README.md
)