Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migration to Standard Library for exp/slices and exp/maps Packages #45933

Closed
hawkingrei opened this issue Aug 9, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #46107
Closed

Migration to Standard Library for exp/slices and exp/maps Packages #45933

hawkingrei opened this issue Aug 9, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #46107
Assignees
Labels
good first issue Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines. type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement.

Comments

@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

Enhancement

With the latest release of Go, we have introduced the new slices and maps packages in the standard library. These packages provide improved functionality and support generic operations on slices and maps of any element or key type.
To leverage the benefits of the standard library and ensure better code maintainability, we need to migrate our codebase from the exp/slices and exp/maps packages to the standard library equivalents.

@hawkingrei hawkingrei added the type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement. label Aug 9, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2023
@hawkingrei hawkingrei added the good first issue Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines. label Aug 9, 2023
@hawkingrei hawkingrei pinned this issue Aug 9, 2023
@yashvardhanmishra
Copy link

/assign

@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member Author

@yashvardhanmishra Thank you. too many code need to update. so you can choose part to migrate.

ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 14, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 15, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 15, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 15, 2023
@hawkingrei hawkingrei reopened this Aug 15, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 24, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2023
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 28, 2023
@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member Author

/test all

@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member Author

I think all the old package has been migrated into the new one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines. type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants