Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executor: add new format specifier(%# %@ %.) for str_to_date expression #22790

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 19, 2021

Conversation

guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator

@guo-shaoge guo-shaoge commented Feb 18, 2021

close #22530

What's Changed: add three function to parse

  1. %#: skip numbers
  2. %.: skip punct
  3. %@: skip alpha

How it Works: If got %# in format specifier, iterate input string and skip all number. Same for the other two.

Related changes

  • Need to cherry-pick to the release branch

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Side effects

  • Performance regression: No perfmance regression
  • Breaking backward compatibility: No compatibility issue

Release note

  • add three format specifier for str_to_date expression

@guo-shaoge guo-shaoge requested a review from a team as a code owner February 18, 2021 09:24
@guo-shaoge guo-shaoge requested review from lzmhhh123 and removed request for a team February 18, 2021 09:24
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Feb 18, 2021

@guo-shaoge guo-shaoge changed the title executor: add new format specifier(%# %@ %.) for str_to_date expression(#22530) executor: add new format specifier(%# %@ %.) for str_to_date expression Feb 18, 2021
@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/run-all-tests

@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@lzmhhh123

@XuHuaiyu XuHuaiyu added the type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug. label Feb 19, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@XuHuaiyu XuHuaiyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-srebot ti-srebot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Feb 19, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@lzmhhh123 lzmhhh123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-srebot ti-srebot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Feb 19, 2021
@lzmhhh123
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-srebot ti-srebot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Feb 19, 2021
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

/run-all-tests

@ti-srebot ti-srebot merged commit a3a4a6c into pingcap:master Feb 19, 2021
ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2021
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-4.0 in PR #22812

ti-srebot pushed a commit to ti-srebot/tidb that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2021
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick to release-5.0-rc in PR #22813

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/expression status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Date function is not compatible with Mysql
5 participants