Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Refresh 2.0 with 1.12 code #4

Closed
sc0ttkclark opened this issue Sep 2, 2011 · 6 comments
Closed

Refresh 2.0 with 1.12 code #4

sc0ttkclark opened this issue Sep 2, 2011 · 6 comments
Assignees
@sc0ttkclark
Labels
Type: Feature Features that add entirely new functionality that was not there before
Milestone
Pods 2.0

Comments

@sc0ttkclark
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@ghost ghost assigned sc0ttkclark Sep 2, 2011
@sc0ttkclark
Copy link
Member Author

Started on this yesterday. All that's left is syncing the classes and functions.php now.

@sc0ttkclark
Copy link
Member Author

Got it all except for the classes Pod (started but not completed) and PodAPI (PodInit is done, PodCache is still in limbo whether it'll be used in 2.0 or if we'll go all object cache / transients API)

@sc0ttkclark
Copy link
Member Author

Commited sc0ttkclark/pods@2328ab6c31d0571ab1d6c9731dd2aac76c2e6a3d

@sc0ttkclark
Copy link
Member Author

Still working on PodAPI and Pod, switched to PodAPI because it should be a little easier since not too much is new there, Pod had a lot of deprecated function names like findRecords >> find so it's a little different and I'll save that for very last.

sc0ttkclark added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 19, 2011
@sc0ttkclark
1.12 to 2.0 refresh #4
49c4555
@sc0ttkclark
Copy link
Member Author

PodAPI done (see above commit), still have refactoring to go back through and do but the main refresh is good, working on final file Pod now.

@sc0ttkclark
Copy link
Member Author

Close with Pod class now, just gotta finish up findRecords

sc0ttkclark added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 20, 2011
@sc0ttkclark
1.12 to 2.0 refresh completed (#4), cleanup and UI next
1c5fc63
@peterlockhart peterlockhart mentioned this issue Jul 26, 2012
Closed
This was referenced Jul 26, 2012
Closed
Closed
@sc0ttkclark sc0ttkclark mentioned this issue Sep 27, 2012
Closed
@pglewis pglewis mentioned this issue Jun 10, 2014
Closed
@etki etki mentioned this issue Oct 25, 2014
Closed
@tanthammar tanthammar mentioned this issue Apr 7, 2018
Closed
@sueboothby sueboothby mentioned this issue Apr 2, 2020
Closed
@papa-pup papa-pup mentioned this issue Sep 23, 2020
Closed
@spalders spalders mentioned this issue Nov 6, 2020
Closed
pdclark added a commit to pdclark/pods that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2021
@pdclark
Freemius: Check _parent object for using method
19c0fcb 
A proposed solution for an error reported in this [Slack thread](https://podswp.slack.com/archives/C02SVLHQF/p1631628235171000).

It appears that `$this->_parent` can contain either an object or a boolean.
This should resolve the error by checking that it's an object before attempting to use the method `->is_anonymous()`.

It looks like `$this->_parent` is used in other places in this class.
Unknown if the `boolean` vs. `object` detail effects any other functionality.

Error:
```
Error Details
=============
An error of type E_ERROR was caused in line 23432 of the file /home/ekhulnac/public_html/destra/plugins/pods/vendor/freemius/wordpress-sdk/includes/class-freemius.php. Error message: Uncaught Error: Call to a member function is_anonymous() on bool in /home/ekhulnac/public_html/destra/plugins/pods/vendor/freemius/wordpress-sdk/includes/class-freemius.php:23432
Stack trace:
#0 /home/ekhulnac/public_html/destra/plugins/pods/vendor/freemius/wordpress-sdk/includes/class-freemius.php(2051): Freemius->_add_tracking_links()
pods-framework#1 /home/ekhulnac/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php(303): Freemius->_hook_action_links_and_register_account_hooks('')
pods-framework#2 /home/ekhulnac/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php(327): WP_Hook->apply_filters(NULL, Array)
pods-framework#3 /home/ekhulnac/public_html/wp-includes/plugin.php(470): WP_Hook->do_action(Array)
pods-framework#4 /home/ekhulnac/public_html/wp-admin/admin.php(175): do_action('admin_init')
pods-framework#5 /home/ekhulnac/public_html/wp-admin/plugins.php(10): require_once('/home/ekhulnac/...')
pods-framework#6 {main}
```
@rcrdb rcrdb mentioned this issue Nov 8, 2021
Closed
@wildmercury wildmercury mentioned this issue Nov 15, 2021
Closed
@professorseo professorseo mentioned this issue Nov 16, 2021
Closed
@mmages mmages mentioned this issue Nov 18, 2021
Closed
@DracoVenturus DracoVenturus mentioned this issue Apr 8, 2022
Closed
@bartgriffin bartgriffin mentioned this issue May 9, 2022
Closed
@mroverssi mroverssi mentioned this issue Jan 25, 2023
Closed
This was referenced May 30, 2023
Closed
Closed
@JoryHogeveen JoryHogeveen mentioned this issue Jun 23, 2023
Closed
@reedtsutton reedtsutton mentioned this issue Apr 11, 2024
Draft
4 tasks
@rosa2 rosa2 mentioned this issue Jul 20, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sc0ttkclark sc0ttkclark

Labels
Type: Feature Features that add entirely new functionality that was not there before
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Pods 2.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@sc0ttkclark