Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Linux 5.19 #169

Merged
merged 0 commits into from
Aug 17, 2022
Merged

Linux 5.19 #169

merged 0 commits into from
Aug 17, 2022

Conversation

13r0ck
Copy link

@13r0ck 13r0ck commented Aug 3, 2022

🎉

@13r0ck 13r0ck requested review from a team August 3, 2022 05:55
@13r0ck 13r0ck force-pushed the linux-5.19 branch 2 times, most recently from 378819c to 9e8434d Compare August 4, 2022 21:02
@gangwerz gangwerz self-assigned this Aug 4, 2022
@n3m0-22
Copy link

n3m0-22 commented Aug 5, 2022

Tested 22.04 on oryp4 and gaze15

Most testing passed. After installing 5.19 both machines would always reboot into integrated graphics mode. This was fixed by the complete removal, and reinstall of the 510 or 515 driver. The 470 driver would not install on either machine. Completely removing the current nvidia driver first did not fix the issue. Booting back into the 5.18.10 kernel the 470 driver still would not install. It would however install without issue on a clean install prior to adding the new kernel.

22.04-oryp4-kernel-testing.txt

22.04-gaze15-kernel-testing.txt

nvidia-470-error.txt

@13r0ck
Copy link
Author

13r0ck commented Aug 5, 2022

@n3m0-22 does pop-os/nvidia-graphics-drivers#157 help?

@n3m0-22
Copy link

n3m0-22 commented Aug 5, 2022

Adding pop-os/nvidia-graphics-drivers#157 did not resolve the issue. I tested by adding it before, and after installing the new kernel. I also tried running sudo apt purge ~nnvidia && sudo apt autoremove and rebooting after adding the 515.57 PR, but the error with still occurs when installing the 470 driver.

@gangwerz
Copy link

gangwerz commented Aug 5, 2022

Adding pop-os/nvidia-graphics-drivers#157 did not resolve the issue. I tested by adding it before, and after installing the new kernel. I also tried running sudo apt purge ~nnvidia && sudo apt autoremove and rebooting after adding the 515.57 PR, but the error with still occurs when installing the 470 driver.

Do you see any DKMS errors when installing 470 like it is failing to build against the newer kernel? Usually those need a bump from Nvidia to be cleared up

@n3m0-22
Copy link

n3m0-22 commented Aug 5, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Yes, in fact this one stands out.

ERROR (dkms apport): kernel package linux-headers-5.19.0-76051900-generic is not supported
Consult /var/lib/dkms/nvidia/470.129.06/build/make.log for more information.

make.log

Looks like this is a known issue.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-470/+bug/1978539
https://www.mail-archive.com/kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net/msg482315.html

@gangwerz
Copy link

gangwerz commented Aug 5, 2022 •
edited
Loading

My Galago has finally finished testing the 150 suspend cycles. I tried switching to the Nvidia 470 driver as well, and I am also seeing the DKMS build failing.

I noticed that the minor version of 470 that is being installed is 470.129.06, while 470.141.03 is the latest release. But, I cannot find any posts indicating that a newer release alone clears up this block.

I did find a Launchpad bug thread about this, in case it helps - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-470/+bug/1978539

@13r0ck
Copy link
Author

13r0ck commented Aug 8, 2022

does pop-os/nvidia-graphics-drivers-470#8 help?

@gangwerz
Copy link

The newer Nvidia 470 package did help! 5.19.0 passed testing on the galp5-1650Ti with Ubuntu and Pop 22.04, but does require the updated 470 driver mentioned in this thread.

Proton Experimental does not seem to be working on this version of 470 across Pop and Ubuntu. But, selecting any of the versioned releases of Proton resolved the issue.

5.19-169-Pop-22.04.txt
5.19-169-Ubuntu-22.04.txt

@13r0ck
Copy link
Author

13r0ck commented Aug 11, 2022

@pop-os/quality-assurance pop-os/nvidia-graphics-drivers-470#8 works, so is this good to approve now?

@n3m0-22
Copy link

n3m0-22 commented Aug 15, 2022

Re-tested 22.04 on oryp4 and gaze15
All previous issues I listed listed above have been resolved by pop-os/nvidia-graphics-drivers-470#8.

@linuxgnuru
Copy link

linuxgnuru commented Aug 15, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Tested on hp-devone, oryp9, and lemp11 with pop 22.04. Everything ran smooth.

hpdev.txt

oryp9.txt

lemp11.txt

linuxgnuru
linuxgnuru approved these changes Aug 16, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@linuxgnuru linuxgnuru left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested Thelio-Mira-b1 and Thelio-r2 with no issues

@13r0ck 13r0ck merged commit 9e8434d into master Aug 17, 2022
@13r0ck 13r0ck deleted the linux-5.19 branch August 17, 2022 02:16
@jackpot51
Copy link
Member

Was virtuabox and zfs tested?

@leviport
Copy link
Member

Was virtuabox and zfs tested?

Yes

mmstick pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2024
@chleroy @gregkh
powerpc/bpf/32: Fix failing test_bpf tests
0d5c132 
[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ]

Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module
exhibits the following failures:

  test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: #165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: #169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: #172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 301 PASS
  test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 555 PASS
  test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 268 PASS
  test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 269 PASS
  test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 460 PASS
  test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 320 PASS
  test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 222 PASS
  test_bpf: #320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 273 PASS

  test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B
  eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 432 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H
  eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 381 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W
  eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 505 PASS

  test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1
  eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported
  jited:0 261 PASS

  test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed]

Fix them by adding missing processing.

Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@crawfxrd crawfxrd crawfxrd approved these changes

@linuxgnuru linuxgnuru linuxgnuru approved these changes

Assignees

@gangwerz gangwerz

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@13r0ck @n3m0-22 @gangwerz @linuxgnuru @jackpot51 @leviport @crawfxrd