Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

5.15.5 #84

Merged
merged 0 commits into from
Nov 30, 2021
Merged

5.15.5 #84

merged 0 commits into from
Nov 30, 2021

Conversation

jackpot51
Copy link
Member

Updates all releases to 5.15.5. Delete master_impish when approved.

@jackpot51 jackpot51 requested review from a team November 29, 2021 16:08
@jackpot51 jackpot51 self-assigned this Nov 29, 2021
This was referenced Nov 29, 2021
Closed
Closed
13r0ck
13r0ck approved these changes Nov 30, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@13r0ck 13r0ck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Passed both Levi and my testing.

@jackpot51 jackpot51 merged commit 09f1aa7 into master Nov 30, 2021
@jackpot51 jackpot51 deleted the 5.15.5 branch November 30, 2021 02:24
jackpot51 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2022
@gregkh
mlxsw: Avoid warning during ip6gre device removal
2d5140d 
[ Upstream commit 810c2f0 ]

IPv6 addresses which are used for tunnels are stored in a hash table
with reference counting. When a new GRE tunnel is configured, the driver
is notified and configures it in hardware.

Currently, any change in the tunnel is not applied in the driver. It
means that if the remote address is changed, the driver is not aware of
this change and the first address will be used.

This behavior results in a warning [1] in scenarios such as the
following:

 # ip link add name gre1 type ip6gre local 2000::3 remote 2000::fffe tos inherit ttl inherit
 # ip link set name gre1 type ip6gre local 2000::3 remote 2000::ffff ttl inherit
 # ip link delete gre1

The change of the address is not applied in the driver. Currently, the
driver uses the remote address which is stored in the 'parms' of the
overlay device. When the tunnel is removed, the new IPv6 address is
used, the driver tries to release it, but as it is not aware of the
change, this address is not configured and it warns about releasing non
existing IPv6 address.

Fix it by using the IPv6 address which is cached in the IPIP entry, this
address is the last one that the driver used, so even in cases such the
above, the first address will be released, without any warning.

[1]:

WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2197 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c:2920 mlxsw_sp_ipv6_addr_put+0x146/0x220 [mlxsw_spectrum]
...
CPU: 1 PID: 2197 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.17.0-rc8-custom-95062-gc1e5ded51a9a #84
Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN4700/VMOD0010, BIOS 5.11 07/12/2021
RIP: 0010:mlxsw_sp_ipv6_addr_put+0x146/0x220 [mlxsw_spectrum]
...
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 mlxsw_sp2_ipip_rem_addr_unset_gre6+0xf1/0x120 [mlxsw_spectrum]
 mlxsw_sp_netdevice_ipip_ol_event+0xdb/0x640 [mlxsw_spectrum]
 mlxsw_sp_netdevice_event+0xc4/0x850 [mlxsw_spectrum]
 raw_notifier_call_chain+0x3c/0x50
 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x2f/0x80
 unregister_netdevice_many+0x311/0x6d0
 rtnl_dellink+0x136/0x360
 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12f/0x380
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x49/0xf0
 netlink_unicast+0x233/0x340
 netlink_sendmsg+0x202/0x440
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x1f3/0x220
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x70/0xb0
 __sys_sendmsg+0x54/0xa0
 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Fixes: e846efe ("mlxsw: spectrum: Add hash table for IPv6 address mapping")
Reported-by: Maksym Yaremchuk <maksymy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511115747.238602-1-idosch@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mmstick pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2024
@chleroy @gregkh
powerpc/bpf/32: Fix failing test_bpf tests
0d5c132 
[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ]

Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module
exhibits the following failures:

  test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: #165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: #169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: #172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 301 PASS
  test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 555 PASS
  test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 268 PASS
  test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 269 PASS
  test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 460 PASS
  test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 320 PASS
  test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 222 PASS
  test_bpf: #320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 273 PASS

  test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B
  eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 432 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H
  eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 381 PASS
  test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W
  eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 505 PASS

  test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1
  eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported
  jited:0 261 PASS

  test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed]

Fix them by adding missing processing.

Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@13r0ck 13r0ck 13r0ck approved these changes

Assignees

@jackpot51 jackpot51

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@jackpot51 @13r0ck