Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SecurityAnalysis: Reconfigure slack distribution outer loops per contingency using an extension #1091

Open
jeandemanged opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1139
Open
Assignees

Comments

@jeandemanged
Copy link
Member

jeandemanged commented Sep 25, 2024

Describe the current behavior

The same outer loops are used for basecase and all contingencies

Describe the expected behavior

Via a contingency extension, e.g. ContingencyParametersExtension ContingencyLoadFlowParameters, we can configure which contingencies should use either SlackDistribution or AreaInterchangeControl.
The operator strategies associated to the contingency, if any, would use the same outerloops as configured for the contingency.

For a start we propose the contingency extension to be created in OLF (and not core).

The extension would for a start support choosing:

  • between SlackDistribution or AreaInterchangeControl,
  • which balanceType should be used (on loads, generators, ...),
    but should server as a basis for other options in the future.

Describe the motivation

Customer request. Depending on the contingency type, either simulate FCR or FRR. (precision: OLF by itself will not check the contingency type, this is done outside OLF when creating/setting up the contingency extension).

Extra Information

No response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants