-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Asyncio test case #13228
Closed
Closed
Asyncio test case #13228
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1st1
reviewed
May 16, 2019
self.addCleanup(self.on_cleanup) | ||
|
||
async def tearDown(self): | ||
self.assertEqual(events, ['setUp', 'test']) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One of the problems I can see happening here is multiple inheritance of tests cases with both "async" and "sync" versions of "tearDown".
- How are you supposed to call
super().tearDown()
in such case? - Is this a serious problem? I think it might be, essentially we're breaking the cooperative nature of
super()
. - Should we prefix all "async" hooks, e.g. "async def asyncTearDown"? Or is that too ugly?
miss-islington
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2019
Add explicit `asyncSetUp` and `asyncTearDown` methods. The rest is the same as for #13228 `AsyncTestCase` create a loop instance for every test for the sake of test isolation. Sometimes a loop shared between all tests can speed up tests execution time a lot but it requires control of closed resources after every test finish. Basically, it requires nested supervisors support that was discussed with @1st1 many times. Sorry, asyncio supervisors have no chance to land on Python 3.8. The PR intentionally does not provide API for changing the used event loop or getting the test loop: use `asyncio.set_event_loop_policy()` and `asyncio.get_event_loop()` instead. The PR adds four overridable methods to base `unittest.TestCase` class: ``` def _callSetUp(self): self.setUp() def _callTestMethod(self, method): method() def _callTearDown(self): self.tearDown() def _callCleanup(self, function, /, *args, **kwargs): function(*args, **kwargs) ``` It allows using asyncio facilities with minimal influence on the unittest code. The last but not least: the PR respects contextvars. The context variable installed by `asyncSetUp` is available on test, `tearDown` and a coroutine scheduled by `addCleanup`. https://bugs.python.org/issue32972
DinoV
pushed a commit
to DinoV/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2020
Add explicit `asyncSetUp` and `asyncTearDown` methods. The rest is the same as for python#13228 `AsyncTestCase` create a loop instance for every test for the sake of test isolation. Sometimes a loop shared between all tests can speed up tests execution time a lot but it requires control of closed resources after every test finish. Basically, it requires nested supervisors support that was discussed with @1st1 many times. Sorry, asyncio supervisors have no chance to land on Python 3.8. The PR intentionally does not provide API for changing the used event loop or getting the test loop: use `asyncio.set_event_loop_policy()` and `asyncio.get_event_loop()` instead. The PR adds four overridable methods to base `unittest.TestCase` class: ``` def _callSetUp(self): self.setUp() def _callTestMethod(self, method): method() def _callTearDown(self): self.tearDown() def _callCleanup(self, function, /, *args, **kwargs): function(*args, **kwargs) ``` It allows using asyncio facilities with minimal influence on the unittest code. The last but not least: the PR respects contextvars. The context variable installed by `asyncSetUp` is available on test, `tearDown` and a coroutine scheduled by `addCleanup`. https://bugs.python.org/issue32972
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A draft implementation for asyncio test case