kernel oops on plugging in any V4l2 device since applying media_build updates for PCTV 461e DVB-S2 #524
Comments
|
Can you explain what "media_build updates for PCTV 461e DVB-S2" are? |
|
Yes, If possible, I wanted to add DVB drivers without having to compile the kernel, particularly as I'm trying to build natively on RPi. I was hoping to get this tuner working as I think you're already aware that the 290e tuner currently won't initialise because of a "GPIO range error" I reported a couple of weeks or so ago. Thank you for helping. |
|
I think you'll have to report this to linuxtv (or whoever produces the driver). |
|
Please report issues regarding upstream subsystems to the relevant maintainers. We can't support backports from various development versions here, as the workload would multiply rapidly. |
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 19, 2016
drm_connector_register_all requires a few too many locks because our connector_list locking is busted. Add another FIXME+hack to work around this. This should address the below lockdep splat: ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 4.7.0-rc5+ #524 Tainted: G O ------------------------------------------------------- kworker/u8:0/6 is trying to acquire lock: (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff815afde0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120 but task is already holding lock: ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff810ac195>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x35/0x70 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}: [<ffffffff810df611>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x200 [<ffffffff819a55b4>] down_write+0x44/0x80 [<ffffffff810abf91>] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x21/0xb0 [<ffffffff814c7448>] fb_register_client+0x18/0x20 [<ffffffff814c6c86>] backlight_device_register+0x136/0x260 [<ffffffffa0127eb2>] intel_backlight_device_register+0xa2/0x160 [i915] [<ffffffffa00f46be>] intel_connector_register+0xe/0x10 [i915] [<ffffffffa0112bfb>] intel_dp_connector_register+0x1b/0x80 [i915] [<ffffffff8159dfea>] drm_connector_register+0x4a/0x80 [<ffffffff8159fe44>] drm_connector_register_all+0x64/0xf0 [<ffffffff815a2a64>] drm_modeset_register_all+0x174/0x1c0 [<ffffffff81599b72>] drm_dev_register+0xc2/0xd0 [<ffffffffa00621d7>] i915_driver_load+0x1547/0x2200 [i915] [<ffffffffa006d80f>] i915_pci_probe+0x4f/0x70 [i915] [<ffffffff814a2135>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0 [<ffffffff814a349b>] pci_device_probe+0xdb/0x130 [<ffffffff815c07e3>] driver_probe_device+0x223/0x440 [<ffffffff815c0ad5>] __driver_attach+0xd5/0x100 [<ffffffff815be386>] bus_for_each_dev+0x66/0xa0 [<ffffffff815c002e>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20 [<ffffffff815bf9be>] bus_add_driver+0x1ee/0x280 [<ffffffff815c1810>] driver_register+0x60/0xe0 [<ffffffff814a1a10>] __pci_register_driver+0x60/0x70 [<ffffffffa01a905b>] i915_init+0x5b/0x62 [i915] [<ffffffff8100042d>] do_one_initcall+0x3d/0x150 [<ffffffff811a935b>] do_init_module+0x5f/0x1d9 [<ffffffff81124416>] load_module+0x20e6/0x27e0 [<ffffffff81124d63>] SYSC_finit_module+0xc3/0xf0 [<ffffffff81124dae>] SyS_finit_module+0xe/0x10 [<ffffffff819a83a9>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xac -> #0 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.+.}: [<ffffffff810df0ac>] __lock_acquire+0x10fc/0x1260 [<ffffffff810df611>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x200 [<ffffffff819a3097>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x3c0 [<ffffffff815afde0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120 [<ffffffff8158f79b>] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x2b/0x80 [<ffffffff8158f81d>] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x2d/0x50 [<ffffffffa0105f7a>] intel_fbdev_set_par+0x1a/0x60 [i915] [<ffffffff814c13c6>] fbcon_init+0x586/0x610 [<ffffffff8154d16a>] visual_init+0xca/0x130 [<ffffffff8154e611>] do_bind_con_driver+0x1c1/0x3a0 [<ffffffff8154eaf6>] do_take_over_console+0x116/0x180 [<ffffffff814bd3a7>] do_fbcon_takeover+0x57/0xb0 [<ffffffff814c1e48>] fbcon_event_notify+0x658/0x750 [<ffffffff810abcae>] notifier_call_chain+0x3e/0xb0 [<ffffffff810ac1ad>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70 [<ffffffff810ac1e6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [<ffffffff814c748b>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20 [<ffffffff814c86b1>] register_framebuffer+0x251/0x330 [<ffffffff8158fa9f>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x25f/0x3f0 [<ffffffffa0106b48>] intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x18/0x30 [i915] [<ffffffff810adfd8>] async_run_entry_fn+0x48/0x150 [<ffffffff810a3947>] process_one_work+0x1e7/0x750 [<ffffffff810a3efb>] worker_thread+0x4b/0x4f0 [<ffffffff810aad4f>] kthread+0xef/0x110 [<ffffffff819a85ef>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((fb_notifier_list).rwsem); lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex); lock((fb_notifier_list).rwsem); lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 6 locks held by kworker/u8:0/6: #0: ("events_unbound"){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff810a38c9>] process_one_work+0x169/0x750 #1: ((&entry->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810a38c9>] process_one_work+0x169/0x750 #2: (registration_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814c8487>] register_framebuffer+0x27/0x330 #3: (console_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814c86ce>] register_framebuffer+0x26e/0x330 #4: (&fb_info->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814c78dd>] lock_fb_info+0x1d/0x40 #5: ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff810ac195>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x35/0x70 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Tainted: G O 4.7.0-rc5+ #524 Hardware name: Intel Corp. Broxton P/NOTEBOOK, BIOS APLKRVPA.X64.0138.B33.1606250842 06/25/2016 Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn 0000000000000000 ffff8800758577f0 ffffffff814507a5 ffffffff828b9900 ffffffff828b9900 ffff880075857830 ffffffff810dc6fa ffff880075857880 ffff88007584d688 0000000000000005 0000000000000006 ffff88007584d6b0 Call Trace: [<ffffffff814507a5>] dump_stack+0x67/0x92 [<ffffffff810dc6fa>] print_circular_bug+0x1aa/0x200 [<ffffffff810df0ac>] __lock_acquire+0x10fc/0x1260 [<ffffffff810df611>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x200 [<ffffffff815afde0>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120 [<ffffffff815afde0>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120 [<ffffffff819a3097>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x3c0 [<ffffffff815afde0>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120 [<ffffffff810fa85f>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x7f/0x90 [<ffffffff81208218>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x248/0x2b0 [<ffffffff815afdc5>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x25/0x120 [<ffffffff815afde0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120 [<ffffffff8158f79b>] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x2b/0x80 [<ffffffff8158f81d>] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x2d/0x50 [<ffffffffa0105f7a>] intel_fbdev_set_par+0x1a/0x60 [i915] [<ffffffff814c13c6>] fbcon_init+0x586/0x610 [<ffffffff8154d16a>] visual_init+0xca/0x130 [<ffffffff8154e611>] do_bind_con_driver+0x1c1/0x3a0 [<ffffffff8154eaf6>] do_take_over_console+0x116/0x180 [<ffffffff814bd3a7>] do_fbcon_takeover+0x57/0xb0 [<ffffffff814c1e48>] fbcon_event_notify+0x658/0x750 [<ffffffff810abcae>] notifier_call_chain+0x3e/0xb0 [<ffffffff810ac1ad>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70 [<ffffffff810ac1e6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [<ffffffff814c748b>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20 [<ffffffff814c86b1>] register_framebuffer+0x251/0x330 [<ffffffff815b7e8d>] ? vga_switcheroo_client_fb_set+0x5d/0x70 [<ffffffff8158fa9f>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x25f/0x3f0 [<ffffffffa0106b48>] intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x18/0x30 [i915] [<ffffffff810adfd8>] async_run_entry_fn+0x48/0x150 [<ffffffff810a3947>] process_one_work+0x1e7/0x750 [<ffffffff810a38c9>] ? process_one_work+0x169/0x750 [<ffffffff810a3efb>] worker_thread+0x4b/0x4f0 [<ffffffff810a3eb0>] ? process_one_work+0x750/0x750 [<ffffffff810aad4f>] kthread+0xef/0x110 [<ffffffff819a85ef>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40 [<ffffffff810aac60>] ? kthread_stop+0x2e0/0x2e0 v2: Rebase onto the right branch (hand-editing patches ftw) and add more reporters. Reported-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reported-by: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 22, 2018
When a tail call fails, it is documented that the tail call should continue execution at the following instruction. An example tail call sequence is: 12: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 13: (b7) r0 = 0 14: (95) exit The ARM assembler for the tail call in this case ends up branching to instruction 14 instead of instruction 13, resulting in the BPF filter returning a non-zero value: 178: ldr r8, [sp, #588] ; insn 12 17c: ldr r6, [r8, r6] 180: ldr r8, [sp, #580] 184: cmp r8, r6 188: bcs 0x1e8 18c: ldr r6, [sp, #524] 190: ldr r7, [sp, #528] 194: cmp r7, #0 198: cmpeq r6, #32 19c: bhi 0x1e8 1a0: adds r6, r6, #1 1a4: adc r7, r7, #0 1a8: str r6, [sp, #524] 1ac: str r7, [sp, #528] 1b0: mov r6, #104 1b4: ldr r8, [sp, #588] 1b8: add r6, r8, r6 1bc: ldr r8, [sp, #580] 1c0: lsl r7, r8, #2 1c4: ldr r6, [r6, r7] 1c8: cmp r6, #0 1cc: beq 0x1e8 1d0: mov r8, #32 1d4: ldr r6, [r6, r8] 1d8: add r6, r6, #44 1dc: bx r6 1e0: mov r0, #0 ; insn 13 1e4: mov r1, #0 1e8: add sp, sp, #596 ; insn 14 1ec: pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, sl, pc} For other sequences, the tail call could end up branching midway through the following BPF instructions, or maybe off the end of the function, leading to unknown behaviours. Fixes: 39c13c2 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 31, 2018
commit f4483f2 upstream. When a tail call fails, it is documented that the tail call should continue execution at the following instruction. An example tail call sequence is: 12: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 13: (b7) r0 = 0 14: (95) exit The ARM assembler for the tail call in this case ends up branching to instruction 14 instead of instruction 13, resulting in the BPF filter returning a non-zero value: 178: ldr r8, [sp, #588] ; insn 12 17c: ldr r6, [r8, r6] 180: ldr r8, [sp, #580] 184: cmp r8, r6 188: bcs 0x1e8 18c: ldr r6, [sp, #524] 190: ldr r7, [sp, #528] 194: cmp r7, #0 198: cmpeq r6, #32 19c: bhi 0x1e8 1a0: adds r6, r6, #1 1a4: adc r7, r7, #0 1a8: str r6, [sp, #524] 1ac: str r7, [sp, #528] 1b0: mov r6, #104 1b4: ldr r8, [sp, #588] 1b8: add r6, r8, r6 1bc: ldr r8, [sp, #580] 1c0: lsl r7, r8, #2 1c4: ldr r6, [r6, r7] 1c8: cmp r6, #0 1cc: beq 0x1e8 1d0: mov r8, #32 1d4: ldr r6, [r6, r8] 1d8: add r6, r6, #44 1dc: bx r6 1e0: mov r0, #0 ; insn 13 1e4: mov r1, #0 1e8: add sp, sp, #596 ; insn 14 1ec: pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, sl, pc} For other sequences, the tail call could end up branching midway through the following BPF instructions, or maybe off the end of the function, leading to unknown behaviours. Fixes: 39c13c2 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 14, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ] When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still be added as a memblock. This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only memory: =================== secram@e000000 { secure-status = "okay"; status = "disabled"; reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>; device_type = "memory"; }; =================== The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an SError: =================== [ 0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 #524 [ 0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340 [ 0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340 [ 0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10 .... ================== The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range. As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory that is meant for non-secure code to use. That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on to the kernel, which will see the secram node. This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as firmware, then booting with the "booti" command. When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we are safe. EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn about memory, so we got lucky there. [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table) [2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063 [3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sigmaris
pushed a commit
to sigmaris/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jun 23, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ] When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still be added as a memblock. This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only memory: =================== secram@e000000 { secure-status = "okay"; status = "disabled"; reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>; device_type = "memory"; }; =================== The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an SError: =================== [ 0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [raspberrypi#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 raspberrypi#524 [ 0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340 [ 0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340 [ 0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10 .... ================== The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range. As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory that is meant for non-secure code to use. That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on to the kernel, which will see the secram node. This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as firmware, then booting with the "booti" command. When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we are safe. EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn about memory, so we got lucky there. [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table) [2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063 [3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 30, 2023
After commit 27a2195 ("power: supply: core: auto-exposure of simple-battery data") we call power_supply_get_battery_info() in __power_supply_register(), but it causes test_battery crash with NULL pointer: [ 7.524846] __power_supply_register: Expected proper parent device for 'test_battery' [ 7.524856] CPU 3 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000278, era == 9000000002fb279c, ra == 9000000003173434 [ 7.524862] Oops[#1]: [ 7.524866] CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.3.0+ #524 [ 7.524870] Hardware name: Loongson Loongson-3A5000-7A1000-1w-CRB/Loongson-LS3A5000-7A1000-1w-CRB, BIOS vUDK2018-LoongArch-V2.0.0-prebeta9 10/21/2022 [ 7.524872] pc 9000000002fb279c ra 9000000003173434 tp 90000001001f0000 sp 90000001001f3c00 [ 7.524875] a0 0000000000000000 a1 0000000000000000 a2 0000000000000000 a3 9000000004553e13 [ 7.524878] a4 9000000004553e16 a5 ffffffffffffffff a6 9000000003fd0948 a7 0000000000000030 [ 7.524881] t0 9000000003173434 t1 90000000035e2c00 t2 0000000000000001 t3 00000000fffff2b0 [ 7.524883] t4 0000000000000007 t5 fffffffffffffffe t6 0000000000000000 t7 0000000000000010 [ 7.524886] t8 00000000000000b4 u0 00000001c0840c76 s9 0000000000000000 s0 0000000000000000 [ 7.524889] s1 900000000370c458 s2 0000000000000001 s3 9000000101f81000 s4 9000000101f81038 [ 7.524891] s5 9000000101f813a0 s6 900000000370c398 s7 9000000003eebd18 s8 90000000037c0070 [ 7.524894] ra: 9000000003173434 power_supply_get_battery_info+0xe4/0x710 [ 7.591224] ERA: 9000000002fb279c __dev_fwnode+0x8/0x20 [ 7.853583] CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) [ 7.859740] PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE) [ 7.864073] EUEN: 00000000 (-FPE -SXE -ASXE -BTE) [ 7.868839] ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7) [ 7.873430] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) [ 7.878884] BADV: 0000000000000278 [ 7.882346] PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000) [ 7.888056] Modules linked in: [ 7.891088] Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, threadinfo=0000000091357ee8, task=00000000313d98cb) [ 7.899307] Stack : 00000000000000b4 900000000279aca8 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [ 7.907274] 0000000000000049 0000000000000408 9000000100008c00 90000000035b6370 [ 7.915238] 900000000b801080 90000000029a440c 9000000003eb4680 9000000003eb4680 [ 7.923202] 9000000101f81038 900000000357cdcc 0000000000000001 900000000370c458 [ 7.931166] 9000000101f81000 90000000037c0070 9000000003eebd18 900000000370c398 [ 7.939131] 90000000045f4530 9000000101f81038 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 [ 7.947095] 900000000370c458 9000000101f81000 0000000000000000 9000000003173e64 [ 7.955059] 0000000000000026 9000000003de3880 9000000100562040 900000000357e07c [ 7.963023] 000000000000026f 0000000000000001 90000001001f3d68 fffffffffffffff5 [ 7.970987] 90000000036d2ca8 90000000027429d8 90000000037c0030 0000000000000001 [ 7.978951] ... [ 7.981379] Call Trace: [ 7.981382] [<9000000002fb279c>] __dev_fwnode+0x8/0x20 [ 7.988916] [<9000000003173434>] power_supply_get_battery_info+0xe4/0x710 [ 7.995666] [<9000000003173e64>] __power_supply_register+0x404/0x580 [ 8.001984] [<900000000379d368>] test_power_init+0x6c/0x124 [ 8.007527] [<90000000026e08f8>] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x1ec [ 8.013066] [<9000000003761614>] kernel_init_freeable+0x290/0x310 [ 8.019127] [<90000000035b40e8>] kernel_init+0x24/0x11c [ 8.024324] [<90000000026e2048>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0xc/0xa4 [ 8.030295] [ 8.031769] Code: 4c000020 0015002c 03400000 <28c9e08c> 40000d80 02c06184 4c000020 28ca0084 4c000020 Root cause: psy->dev.parent is NULL in power_supply_get_battery_info(), so change the else branch to be 'else if (psy->dev.parent)' and return -ENOENT if psy->dev.parent is NULL. Fixes: 27a2195 ("power: supply: core: auto-exposure of simple-battery data") Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: