Added dma masks to board-config of the spi driver. #405
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This way a driver "claiming" this device can allocate memory from the DMA range Signed-off-by: Martin Sperl <kernel@martin.sperl.org>
|
It would probably be good to add it to other (future) branches as well... This is a replica of a different pull request, which was not done in a separate branch and thus included different patches from myself... So this version is cleaned up and based on a separate branch. |
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2017
When two function probes are added to set_ftrace_filter, and then one of them is removed, the update to the function locations is not performed, and the record keeping of the function states are corrupted, and causes an ftrace_bug() to occur. This is easily reproducable by adding two probes, removing one, and then adding it back again. # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing # echo schedule:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter # echo do_IRQ:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter # echo \!do_IRQ:traceoff > /debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter # echo do_IRQ:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter Causes: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1098 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2369 ftrace_get_addr_curr+0x143/0x220 Modules linked in: [...] CPU: 2 PID: 1098 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.10.0-test+ #405 Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF/339A, BIOS K01 v02.05 05/07/2012 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x68/0x9f __warn+0x111/0x130 ? trace_irq_work_interrupt+0xa0/0xa0 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 ftrace_get_addr_curr+0x143/0x220 ? __fentry__+0x10/0x10 ftrace_replace_code+0xe3/0x4f0 ? ftrace_int3_handler+0x90/0x90 ? printk+0x99/0xb5 ? 0xffffffff81000000 ftrace_modify_all_code+0x97/0x110 arch_ftrace_update_code+0x10/0x20 ftrace_run_update_code+0x1c/0x60 ftrace_run_modify_code.isra.48.constprop.62+0x8e/0xd0 register_ftrace_function_probe+0x4b6/0x590 ? ftrace_startup+0x310/0x310 ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled.part.4+0x1a/0x30 ? update_stack_state+0x88/0x110 ? ftrace_regex_write.isra.43.part.44+0x1d3/0x320 ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xd0 ? mutex_lock_nested+0x104/0x800 ? ftrace_regex_write.isra.43.part.44+0x1d3/0x320 ? __unwind_start+0x1c0/0x1c0 ? _mutex_lock_nest_lock+0x800/0x800 ftrace_trace_probe_callback.isra.3+0xc0/0x130 ? func_set_flag+0xe0/0xe0 ? __lock_acquire+0x642/0x1790 ? __might_fault+0x1e/0x20 ? trace_get_user+0x398/0x470 ? strcmp+0x35/0x60 ftrace_trace_onoff_callback+0x48/0x70 ftrace_regex_write.isra.43.part.44+0x251/0x320 ? match_records+0x420/0x420 ftrace_filter_write+0x2b/0x30 __vfs_write+0xd7/0x330 ? do_loop_readv_writev+0x120/0x120 ? locks_remove_posix+0x90/0x2f0 ? do_lock_file_wait+0x160/0x160 ? __lock_is_held+0x93/0x100 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x5c/0xb0 ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xd0 ? __sb_start_write+0x10a/0x230 ? vfs_write+0x222/0x240 vfs_write+0xef/0x240 SyS_write+0xab/0x130 ? SyS_read+0x130/0x130 ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x182/0x280 ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad RIP: 0033:0x7fe61c157c30 RSP: 002b:00007ffe87890258 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: ffffffff8114a410 RCX: 00007fe61c157c30 RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 000055814798f5e0 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffff8800c9027f98 R08: 00007fe61c422740 R09: 00007fe61ca53700 R10: 0000000000000073 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000558147a36400 R13: 00007ffe8788f160 R14: 0000000000000024 R15: 00007ffe8788f15c ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0xc0/0x110 ---[ end trace 99fa09b3d9869c2c ]--- Bad trampoline accounting at: ffffffff81cc3b00 (do_IRQ+0x0/0x150) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 59df055 ("ftrace: trace different functions with a different tracer") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
ED6E0F17
pushed a commit
to ED6E0F17/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 21, 2017
commit 82cc4fc upstream. When two function probes are added to set_ftrace_filter, and then one of them is removed, the update to the function locations is not performed, and the record keeping of the function states are corrupted, and causes an ftrace_bug() to occur. This is easily reproducable by adding two probes, removing one, and then adding it back again. # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing # echo schedule:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter # echo do_IRQ:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter # echo \!do_IRQ:traceoff > /debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter # echo do_IRQ:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter Causes: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1098 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2369 ftrace_get_addr_curr+0x143/0x220 Modules linked in: [...] CPU: 2 PID: 1098 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.10.0-test+ raspberrypi#405 Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF/339A, BIOS K01 v02.05 05/07/2012 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x68/0x9f __warn+0x111/0x130 ? trace_irq_work_interrupt+0xa0/0xa0 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 ftrace_get_addr_curr+0x143/0x220 ? __fentry__+0x10/0x10 ftrace_replace_code+0xe3/0x4f0 ? ftrace_int3_handler+0x90/0x90 ? printk+0x99/0xb5 ? 0xffffffff81000000 ftrace_modify_all_code+0x97/0x110 arch_ftrace_update_code+0x10/0x20 ftrace_run_update_code+0x1c/0x60 ftrace_run_modify_code.isra.48.constprop.62+0x8e/0xd0 register_ftrace_function_probe+0x4b6/0x590 ? ftrace_startup+0x310/0x310 ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled.part.4+0x1a/0x30 ? update_stack_state+0x88/0x110 ? ftrace_regex_write.isra.43.part.44+0x1d3/0x320 ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xd0 ? mutex_lock_nested+0x104/0x800 ? ftrace_regex_write.isra.43.part.44+0x1d3/0x320 ? __unwind_start+0x1c0/0x1c0 ? _mutex_lock_nest_lock+0x800/0x800 ftrace_trace_probe_callback.isra.3+0xc0/0x130 ? func_set_flag+0xe0/0xe0 ? __lock_acquire+0x642/0x1790 ? __might_fault+0x1e/0x20 ? trace_get_user+0x398/0x470 ? strcmp+0x35/0x60 ftrace_trace_onoff_callback+0x48/0x70 ftrace_regex_write.isra.43.part.44+0x251/0x320 ? match_records+0x420/0x420 ftrace_filter_write+0x2b/0x30 __vfs_write+0xd7/0x330 ? do_loop_readv_writev+0x120/0x120 ? locks_remove_posix+0x90/0x2f0 ? do_lock_file_wait+0x160/0x160 ? __lock_is_held+0x93/0x100 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x5c/0xb0 ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xd0 ? __sb_start_write+0x10a/0x230 ? vfs_write+0x222/0x240 vfs_write+0xef/0x240 SyS_write+0xab/0x130 ? SyS_read+0x130/0x130 ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x182/0x280 ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad RIP: 0033:0x7fe61c157c30 RSP: 002b:00007ffe87890258 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: ffffffff8114a410 RCX: 00007fe61c157c30 RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 000055814798f5e0 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffff8800c9027f98 R08: 00007fe61c422740 R09: 00007fe61ca53700 R10: 0000000000000073 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000558147a36400 R13: 00007ffe8788f160 R14: 0000000000000024 R15: 00007ffe8788f15c ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0xc0/0x110 ---[ end trace 99fa09b3d9869c2c ]--- Bad trampoline accounting at: ffffffff81cc3b00 (do_IRQ+0x0/0x150) Fixes: 59df055 ("ftrace: trace different functions with a different tracer") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2017
commit 82cc4fc upstream. When two function probes are added to set_ftrace_filter, and then one of them is removed, the update to the function locations is not performed, and the record keeping of the function states are corrupted, and causes an ftrace_bug() to occur. This is easily reproducable by adding two probes, removing one, and then adding it back again. # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing # echo schedule:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter # echo do_IRQ:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter # echo \!do_IRQ:traceoff > /debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter # echo do_IRQ:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter Causes: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1098 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2369 ftrace_get_addr_curr+0x143/0x220 Modules linked in: [...] CPU: 2 PID: 1098 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.10.0-test+ #405 Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF/339A, BIOS K01 v02.05 05/07/2012 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x68/0x9f __warn+0x111/0x130 ? trace_irq_work_interrupt+0xa0/0xa0 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 ftrace_get_addr_curr+0x143/0x220 ? __fentry__+0x10/0x10 ftrace_replace_code+0xe3/0x4f0 ? ftrace_int3_handler+0x90/0x90 ? printk+0x99/0xb5 ? 0xffffffff81000000 ftrace_modify_all_code+0x97/0x110 arch_ftrace_update_code+0x10/0x20 ftrace_run_update_code+0x1c/0x60 ftrace_run_modify_code.isra.48.constprop.62+0x8e/0xd0 register_ftrace_function_probe+0x4b6/0x590 ? ftrace_startup+0x310/0x310 ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled.part.4+0x1a/0x30 ? update_stack_state+0x88/0x110 ? ftrace_regex_write.isra.43.part.44+0x1d3/0x320 ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xd0 ? mutex_lock_nested+0x104/0x800 ? ftrace_regex_write.isra.43.part.44+0x1d3/0x320 ? __unwind_start+0x1c0/0x1c0 ? _mutex_lock_nest_lock+0x800/0x800 ftrace_trace_probe_callback.isra.3+0xc0/0x130 ? func_set_flag+0xe0/0xe0 ? __lock_acquire+0x642/0x1790 ? __might_fault+0x1e/0x20 ? trace_get_user+0x398/0x470 ? strcmp+0x35/0x60 ftrace_trace_onoff_callback+0x48/0x70 ftrace_regex_write.isra.43.part.44+0x251/0x320 ? match_records+0x420/0x420 ftrace_filter_write+0x2b/0x30 __vfs_write+0xd7/0x330 ? do_loop_readv_writev+0x120/0x120 ? locks_remove_posix+0x90/0x2f0 ? do_lock_file_wait+0x160/0x160 ? __lock_is_held+0x93/0x100 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x5c/0xb0 ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xd0 ? __sb_start_write+0x10a/0x230 ? vfs_write+0x222/0x240 vfs_write+0xef/0x240 SyS_write+0xab/0x130 ? SyS_read+0x130/0x130 ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x182/0x280 ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad RIP: 0033:0x7fe61c157c30 RSP: 002b:00007ffe87890258 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: ffffffff8114a410 RCX: 00007fe61c157c30 RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 000055814798f5e0 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffff8800c9027f98 R08: 00007fe61c422740 R09: 00007fe61ca53700 R10: 0000000000000073 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000558147a36400 R13: 00007ffe8788f160 R14: 0000000000000024 R15: 00007ffe8788f15c ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0xc0/0x110 ---[ end trace 99fa09b3d9869c2c ]--- Bad trampoline accounting at: ffffffff81cc3b00 (do_IRQ+0x0/0x150) Fixes: 59df055 ("ftrace: trace different functions with a different tracer") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
dlech
pushed a commit
to ev3dev/rpi-kernel
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2017
commit 82cc4fc upstream. When two function probes are added to set_ftrace_filter, and then one of them is removed, the update to the function locations is not performed, and the record keeping of the function states are corrupted, and causes an ftrace_bug() to occur. This is easily reproducable by adding two probes, removing one, and then adding it back again. # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing # echo schedule:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter # echo do_IRQ:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter # echo \!do_IRQ:traceoff > /debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter # echo do_IRQ:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter Causes: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1098 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2369 ftrace_get_addr_curr+0x143/0x220 Modules linked in: [...] CPU: 2 PID: 1098 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.10.0-test+ raspberrypi#405 Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF/339A, BIOS K01 v02.05 05/07/2012 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x68/0x9f __warn+0x111/0x130 ? trace_irq_work_interrupt+0xa0/0xa0 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 ftrace_get_addr_curr+0x143/0x220 ? __fentry__+0x10/0x10 ftrace_replace_code+0xe3/0x4f0 ? ftrace_int3_handler+0x90/0x90 ? printk+0x99/0xb5 ? 0xffffffff81000000 ftrace_modify_all_code+0x97/0x110 arch_ftrace_update_code+0x10/0x20 ftrace_run_update_code+0x1c/0x60 ftrace_run_modify_code.isra.48.constprop.62+0x8e/0xd0 register_ftrace_function_probe+0x4b6/0x590 ? ftrace_startup+0x310/0x310 ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled.part.4+0x1a/0x30 ? update_stack_state+0x88/0x110 ? ftrace_regex_write.isra.43.part.44+0x1d3/0x320 ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xd0 ? mutex_lock_nested+0x104/0x800 ? ftrace_regex_write.isra.43.part.44+0x1d3/0x320 ? __unwind_start+0x1c0/0x1c0 ? _mutex_lock_nest_lock+0x800/0x800 ftrace_trace_probe_callback.isra.3+0xc0/0x130 ? func_set_flag+0xe0/0xe0 ? __lock_acquire+0x642/0x1790 ? __might_fault+0x1e/0x20 ? trace_get_user+0x398/0x470 ? strcmp+0x35/0x60 ftrace_trace_onoff_callback+0x48/0x70 ftrace_regex_write.isra.43.part.44+0x251/0x320 ? match_records+0x420/0x420 ftrace_filter_write+0x2b/0x30 __vfs_write+0xd7/0x330 ? do_loop_readv_writev+0x120/0x120 ? locks_remove_posix+0x90/0x2f0 ? do_lock_file_wait+0x160/0x160 ? __lock_is_held+0x93/0x100 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x5c/0xb0 ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xd0 ? __sb_start_write+0x10a/0x230 ? vfs_write+0x222/0x240 vfs_write+0xef/0x240 SyS_write+0xab/0x130 ? SyS_read+0x130/0x130 ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x182/0x280 ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad RIP: 0033:0x7fe61c157c30 RSP: 002b:00007ffe87890258 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: ffffffff8114a410 RCX: 00007fe61c157c30 RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 000055814798f5e0 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffff8800c9027f98 R08: 00007fe61c422740 R09: 00007fe61ca53700 R10: 0000000000000073 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000558147a36400 R13: 00007ffe8788f160 R14: 0000000000000024 R15: 00007ffe8788f15c ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0xc0/0x110 ---[ end trace 99fa09b3d9869c2c ]--- Bad trampoline accounting at: ffffffff81cc3b00 (do_IRQ+0x0/0x150) Fixes: 59df055 ("ftrace: trace different functions with a different tracer") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
skullandbones
pushed a commit
to skullandbones/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2019
[ Upstream commit 28261da ] Because of both sides doing L2CAP disconnection at the same time, it was possible to receive L2CAP Disconnection Response with CID that was already freed. That caused problems if CID was already reused and L2CAP Connection Request with same CID was sent out. Before this patch kernel deleted channel context regardless of the state of the channel. Example where leftover Disconnection Response (frame raspberrypi#402) causes local device to delete L2CAP channel which was not yet connected. This in turn confuses remote device's stack because same CID is re-used without properly disconnecting. Btmon capture before patch: ** snip ** > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 raspberrypi#394 [hci1] 10.748949 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 raspberrypi#395 [hci1] 10.749062 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 raspberrypi#396 [hci1] 10.749073 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 raspberrypi#397 [hci1] 10.752391 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 raspberrypi#398 [hci1] 10.753394 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 raspberrypi#399 [hci1] 10.756499 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 raspberrypi#400 [hci1] 10.756548 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 raspberrypi#401 [hci1] 10.757459 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 raspberrypi#402 [hci1] 10.759148 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 = bluetoothd: 00:1E:AB:4C:56:54: error updating services: Input/o.. 10.759447 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 raspberrypi#403 [hci1] 10.759386 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 raspberrypi#404 [hci1] 10.760397 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 27 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 raspberrypi#405 [hci1] 10.760441 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 27 len 8 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 raspberrypi#406 [hci1] 10.760449 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 19 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 raspberrypi#407 [hci1] 10.761399 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 raspberrypi#408 [hci1] 10.762942 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Similar case after the patch: *snip* > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 #22702 [hci0] 1664.411056 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 #22703 [hci0] 1664.411136 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22704 [hci0] 1664.411143 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22705 [hci0] 1664.414009 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22706 [hci0] 1664.415007 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22707 [hci0] 1664.418674 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22708 [hci0] 1664.418762 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22709 [hci0] 1664.421073 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 12 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22710 [hci0] 1664.421371 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22711 [hci0] 1664.424082 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22712 [hci0] 1664.425040 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22713 [hci0] 1664.426103 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 #22714 [hci0] 1664.426186 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 #22715 [hci0] 1664.426196 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 13 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 #22716 [hci0] 1664.428804 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 12 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Fix is to check that channel is in state BT_DISCONN before deleting the channel. This bug was found while fuzzing Bluez's OBEX implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Matti Kamunen <matti.kamunen@synopsys.com> Reported-by: Ari Timonen <ari.timonen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2019
[ Upstream commit 28261da ] Because of both sides doing L2CAP disconnection at the same time, it was possible to receive L2CAP Disconnection Response with CID that was already freed. That caused problems if CID was already reused and L2CAP Connection Request with same CID was sent out. Before this patch kernel deleted channel context regardless of the state of the channel. Example where leftover Disconnection Response (frame #402) causes local device to delete L2CAP channel which was not yet connected. This in turn confuses remote device's stack because same CID is re-used without properly disconnecting. Btmon capture before patch: ** snip ** > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 #394 [hci1] 10.748949 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 #395 [hci1] 10.749062 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #396 [hci1] 10.749073 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #397 [hci1] 10.752391 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #398 [hci1] 10.753394 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #399 [hci1] 10.756499 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #400 [hci1] 10.756548 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #401 [hci1] 10.757459 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #402 [hci1] 10.759148 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 = bluetoothd: 00:1E:AB:4C:56:54: error updating services: Input/o.. 10.759447 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #403 [hci1] 10.759386 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #404 [hci1] 10.760397 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 27 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 #405 [hci1] 10.760441 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 27 len 8 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 #406 [hci1] 10.760449 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 19 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #407 [hci1] 10.761399 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 #408 [hci1] 10.762942 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Similar case after the patch: *snip* > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 #22702 [hci0] 1664.411056 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 #22703 [hci0] 1664.411136 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22704 [hci0] 1664.411143 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22705 [hci0] 1664.414009 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22706 [hci0] 1664.415007 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22707 [hci0] 1664.418674 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22708 [hci0] 1664.418762 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22709 [hci0] 1664.421073 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 12 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22710 [hci0] 1664.421371 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22711 [hci0] 1664.424082 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22712 [hci0] 1664.425040 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22713 [hci0] 1664.426103 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 #22714 [hci0] 1664.426186 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 #22715 [hci0] 1664.426196 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 13 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 #22716 [hci0] 1664.428804 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 12 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Fix is to check that channel is in state BT_DISCONN before deleting the channel. This bug was found while fuzzing Bluez's OBEX implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Matti Kamunen <matti.kamunen@synopsys.com> Reported-by: Ari Timonen <ari.timonen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2019
[ Upstream commit 28261da ] Because of both sides doing L2CAP disconnection at the same time, it was possible to receive L2CAP Disconnection Response with CID that was already freed. That caused problems if CID was already reused and L2CAP Connection Request with same CID was sent out. Before this patch kernel deleted channel context regardless of the state of the channel. Example where leftover Disconnection Response (frame #402) causes local device to delete L2CAP channel which was not yet connected. This in turn confuses remote device's stack because same CID is re-used without properly disconnecting. Btmon capture before patch: ** snip ** > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 #394 [hci1] 10.748949 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 #395 [hci1] 10.749062 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #396 [hci1] 10.749073 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #397 [hci1] 10.752391 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #398 [hci1] 10.753394 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #399 [hci1] 10.756499 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #400 [hci1] 10.756548 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #401 [hci1] 10.757459 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #402 [hci1] 10.759148 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 = bluetoothd: 00:1E:AB:4C:56:54: error updating services: Input/o.. 10.759447 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #403 [hci1] 10.759386 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #404 [hci1] 10.760397 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 27 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 #405 [hci1] 10.760441 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 27 len 8 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 #406 [hci1] 10.760449 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 19 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #407 [hci1] 10.761399 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 #408 [hci1] 10.762942 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Similar case after the patch: *snip* > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 #22702 [hci0] 1664.411056 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 #22703 [hci0] 1664.411136 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22704 [hci0] 1664.411143 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22705 [hci0] 1664.414009 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22706 [hci0] 1664.415007 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22707 [hci0] 1664.418674 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22708 [hci0] 1664.418762 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22709 [hci0] 1664.421073 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 12 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22710 [hci0] 1664.421371 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22711 [hci0] 1664.424082 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22712 [hci0] 1664.425040 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22713 [hci0] 1664.426103 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 #22714 [hci0] 1664.426186 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 #22715 [hci0] 1664.426196 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 13 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 #22716 [hci0] 1664.428804 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 12 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Fix is to check that channel is in state BT_DISCONN before deleting the channel. This bug was found while fuzzing Bluez's OBEX implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Matti Kamunen <matti.kamunen@synopsys.com> Reported-by: Ari Timonen <ari.timonen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2022
[ Upstream commit 1a15eb7 ] For device removal and replace we call btrfs_find_device_by_devspec, which if we give it a device path and nothing else will call btrfs_get_dev_args_from_path, which opens the block device and reads the super block and then looks up our device based on that. However at this point we're holding the sb write "lock", so reading the block device pulls in the dependency of ->open_mutex, which produces the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ #405 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/11576 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9bbe8cded938 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff9bbe88e4fc68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x56/0x3c0 blkdev_get_by_path+0x98/0xa0 btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 btrfs_find_device_by_devspec+0x12b/0x1c0 btrfs_rm_device+0x127/0x610 btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x245/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/11576: #0: ffff9bbe88e4fc68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 11576 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #405 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f31b02404cb Instead what we want to do is populate our device lookup args before we grab any locks, and then pass these args into btrfs_rm_device(). From there we can find the device and do the appropriate removal. Suggested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2023
…h cpu=v4 Bpf cpu=v4 support is introduced in [1] and Commit 4cd58e9 ("bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction") added support for new 32bit offset jmp instruction. Unfortunately, in function bpf_adj_delta_to_off(), for new branch insn with 32bit offset, the offset (plus/minor a small delta) compares to 16-bit offset bound [S16_MIN, S16_MAX], which caused the following verification failure: $ ./test_progs-cpuv4 -t verif_scale_pyperf180 ... insn 10 cannot be patched due to 16-bit range ... libbpf: failed to load object 'pyperf180.bpf.o' scale_test:FAIL:expect_success unexpected error: -12 (errno 12) #405 verif_scale_pyperf180:FAIL Note that due to recent llvm18 development, the patch [2] (already applied in bpf-next) needs to be applied to bpf tree for testing purpose. The fix is rather simple. For 32bit offset branch insn, the adjusted offset compares to [S32_MIN, S32_MAX] and then verification succeeded. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230728011143.3710005-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231110193644.3130906-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Fixes: 4cd58e9 ("bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231201024640.3417057-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2023
…h cpu=v4 [ Upstream commit dfce9cb ] Bpf cpu=v4 support is introduced in [1] and Commit 4cd58e9 ("bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction") added support for new 32bit offset jmp instruction. Unfortunately, in function bpf_adj_delta_to_off(), for new branch insn with 32bit offset, the offset (plus/minor a small delta) compares to 16-bit offset bound [S16_MIN, S16_MAX], which caused the following verification failure: $ ./test_progs-cpuv4 -t verif_scale_pyperf180 ... insn 10 cannot be patched due to 16-bit range ... libbpf: failed to load object 'pyperf180.bpf.o' scale_test:FAIL:expect_success unexpected error: -12 (errno 12) #405 verif_scale_pyperf180:FAIL Note that due to recent llvm18 development, the patch [2] (already applied in bpf-next) needs to be applied to bpf tree for testing purpose. The fix is rather simple. For 32bit offset branch insn, the adjusted offset compares to [S32_MIN, S32_MAX] and then verification succeeded. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230728011143.3710005-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231110193644.3130906-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Fixes: 4cd58e9 ("bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231201024640.3417057-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2024
…h cpu=v4 commit dfce9cb upstream. Bpf cpu=v4 support is introduced in [1] and Commit 4cd58e9 ("bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction") added support for new 32bit offset jmp instruction. Unfortunately, in function bpf_adj_delta_to_off(), for new branch insn with 32bit offset, the offset (plus/minor a small delta) compares to 16-bit offset bound [S16_MIN, S16_MAX], which caused the following verification failure: $ ./test_progs-cpuv4 -t verif_scale_pyperf180 ... insn 10 cannot be patched due to 16-bit range ... libbpf: failed to load object 'pyperf180.bpf.o' scale_test:FAIL:expect_success unexpected error: -12 (errno 12) #405 verif_scale_pyperf180:FAIL Note that due to recent llvm18 development, the patch [2] (already applied in bpf-next) needs to be applied to bpf tree for testing purpose. The fix is rather simple. For 32bit offset branch insn, the adjusted offset compares to [S32_MIN, S32_MAX] and then verification succeeded. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230728011143.3710005-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231110193644.3130906-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Fixes: 4cd58e9 ("bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231201024640.3417057-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This way a driver "claiming" this device can allocate memory from the DMA range.
Signed-off-by: Martin Sperl kernel@martin.sperl.org