Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[dashing] Support for API break on Fast DDS 2.0 #411

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2020

Conversation

MiguelCompany
Copy link
Collaborator

Some users are trying to build dashing from sources using Fast DDS 2.0.x.

This PR contains changes equivalent to the ones in #370 to support that.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company miguelcompany@eProsima.com

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eProsima.com>
@clalancette
Copy link
Contributor

@nuclearsandwich FYI

Copy link
Member

@ivanpauno ivanpauno left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO it's safe to merge this, as it won't affect our current Dashing builds.
@clalancette @nuclearsandwich do you think it can be merged?

@MiguelCompany
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@nuclearsandwich @clalancette It's been a month since this was approved. Is there anything preventing it to be merged?

@nuclearsandwich
Copy link
Member

nuclearsandwich commented Nov 13, 2020

CI running communication tests with this backport:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • macOS Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

Edit: forgot to update the remote as well as the branch.

@nuclearsandwich
Copy link
Member

Is there anything preventing it to be merged?

CI hasn't been run yet. Assuming that it's comparable to recent builds of Dashing CI I will merge it.

@nuclearsandwich nuclearsandwich merged commit b6333c2 into ros2:dashing Nov 13, 2020
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany deleted the dashing-fastdds-2.0.x branch April 6, 2021 07:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants