Phase 1 of stdlib dependencies (RFC #1133) #2768
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
Ericson2314
force-pushed
the
stdlib-deps
branch
3 times, most recently
from
318c0ef to
9716ee1
Compare
|
Ok, routed some config items for actually using this thing. Still need to write tests on the actual functionality, not just parsing----or test manually though if I can do the former I rather not bother. But, if it works, it's pretty close to done beyond bike-shedding config key names, etc. |
src/cargo/util/toml.rs
Outdated
| Some(reference) => { | ||
| let config = try!(config.get_string("stdlib-repo")); | ||
| let url = config.as_ref().map(|s| &s.val[..]) | ||
| .unwrap_or("http://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This PR rust-lang-deprecated/rust-buildbot#102 should allow to avoid using git repository here, which is slow.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is slow (though it's a lot faster when I use the git cli to download myself). What is this manifest though? I don't use rustup.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hm, I thought that this manifest specifies the things uploaded to https://static.rust-lang.org, but looks like rust sources are already there. Perhaps downloading .tar.gz from static.rust-lang.org would be faster? Or is it significantly more code to write?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is the actual URL? (I hate how hard it is to browse https://static.rust-lang.org.) If the nightly repos are up by date, but rustc -vV only gives us the commit hash (both those statements might be false :)), this will be a lot harder.
I'm generally interested in fixing the perf problem with Cargo, but at this point I just want to see explicit stdlib deps in some form and am not too picky :).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like the url should be https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/$date/rustc-nightly-src.tar.gz. rustc -vV includes date:
rustc 1.9.0 (e4e8b6668 2016-05-18)Not sure about beta though.
binary: rustc
commit-hash: e4e8b666850a763fdf1c3c2c142856ab51e32779
commit-date: 2016-05-18
host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
release: 1.9.0
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #2680) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Ericson2314
force-pushed
the
stdlib-deps
branch
from
9716ee1 to
1639ad6
Compare
Ericson2314
force-pushed
the
stdlib-deps
branch
7 times, most recently
from
d6d0617 to
2f97f22
Compare
Ericson2314
changed the title
Ericson2314
force-pushed
the
stdlib-deps
branch
6 times, most recently
from
159ee77 to
1c234c4
Compare
Ericson2314
changed the title
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #3064) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
(Because I have less time with work, I've enabled maintainer access to this branch.) |
The location of the compiler source can be overwritten, but ca
Ericson2314
force-pushed
the
stdlib-deps
branch
from
1c234c4 to
ca0b3ab
Compare
|
Rebased |
…f the compiler source
Ericson2314
force-pushed
the
stdlib-deps
branch
from
ca0b3ab to
3343785
Compare
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #3175) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
@alexcrichton Since you're the assignee here do you have any feedback on this PR? If it looks like this approach will work going forward I'll gladly take it over and get it landed since @Ericson2314 is unable to work on it further. |
|
@cardoe this is currently blocked on rust-lang/rfcs#1133, unfortunately |
|
@cardoe yeah I haven't abandoned this or the RFC, but have been waiting for the RFC to arrive at the front of the queue. |
|
I'm going to close this due to inactivity, in favor of the open RFC. |
|
https://github.com/cardoe/cargo/commits/stdlib-deps is a rebase (Thanks @cardoe!) that I should link here lest it be lost to posterity. |
This is the first implementation as specified by the RFC. It should contain:
keep-stdlib-dependencieskeycustom-implicit-stdlib-dependencieskey