Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom Debug implementations for mpsc #2667

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2022

Conversation

daxpedda
Copy link
Contributor

This is the same PR as #2414 but for mpsc instead of oneshot. I'm not sure if it is considered okay to do atomic operations in a Debug implementation, but I can't think of a reason why not to.

This also removes the Debug constraint on Debug implementations on all mpsc types, similar to #2666.

Copy link
Member

@taiki-e taiki-e left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@taiki-e taiki-e added A-channel Area: futures::channel 0.3-backport: pending The maintainer accepted to backport this to the 0.3 branch, but backport has not been done yet. labels Nov 27, 2022
@taiki-e taiki-e merged commit be27d72 into rust-lang:master Nov 27, 2022
daxpedda added a commit to daxpedda/futures-rs that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2022
@taiki-e taiki-e added 0.3-backport: completed and removed 0.3-backport: pending The maintainer accepted to backport this to the 0.3 branch, but backport has not been done yet. labels Jan 30, 2023
taiki-e pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2023
@taiki-e taiki-e mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2023
taiki-e pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2023
crapStone pushed a commit to Calciumdibromid/CaBr2 that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2023
This PR contains the following updates:

| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [futures](https://rust-lang.github.io/futures-rs) ([source](https://github.com/rust-lang/futures-rs)) | dependencies | patch | `0.3.25` -> `0.3.26` |

---

### Release Notes

<details>
<summary>rust-lang/futures-rs</summary>

### [`v0.3.26`](https://github.com/rust-lang/futures-rs/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#&#8203;0326---2023-01-30)

[Compare Source](rust-lang/futures-rs@0.3.25...0.3.26)

-   Add `Either::as_pin_mut` and `Either::as_pin_ref` ([#&#8203;2691](rust-lang/futures-rs#2691))
-   Add `Shared::ptr_eq` and `Shared::ptr_hash` ([#&#8203;2691](rust-lang/futures-rs#2691))
-   Implement `FusedStream` for `Buffered` ([#&#8203;2676](rust-lang/futures-rs#2676))
-   Implement `FusedStream` for all streams in `ReadyChunks` ([#&#8203;2693](rust-lang/futures-rs#2693))
-   Fix bug in `FuturesOrdered::push_front` ([#&#8203;2664](rust-lang/futures-rs#2664))
-   Remove `Fut::Output: Clone` bounds from some `Shared` methods ([#&#8203;2662](rust-lang/futures-rs#2662))
-   Remove `T: Debug` bounds from `Debug` implementations of `mpsc` and `oneshot` types ([#&#8203;2666](rust-lang/futures-rs#2666), [#&#8203;2667](rust-lang/futures-rs#2667))

</details>

---

### Configuration

📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

 - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNC4xMTYuMSIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjM0LjExOS4yIn0=-->

Co-authored-by: cabr2-bot <cabr2.help@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Calciumdibromid/CaBr2/pulls/1762
Reviewed-by: crapStone <crapstone@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants