-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do not report cycle error when inferring return type for suggestion #100389
Merged
bors
merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:master
from
compiler-errors:return-type-suggestion-cycle
Aug 17, 2022
Merged
Do not report cycle error when inferring return type for suggestion #100389
bors
merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:master
from
compiler-errors:return-type-suggestion-cycle
Aug 17, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
label
Aug 10, 2022
r? @nagisa (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Aug 10, 2022
cjgillot
reviewed
Aug 14, 2022
r? @cjgillot |
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
return-type-suggestion-cycle
branch
from
August 16, 2022 02:42
4ca9f8f
to
eaf480b
Compare
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
return-type-suggestion-cycle
branch
from
August 16, 2022 03:00
eaf480b
to
5309375
Compare
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Aug 16, 2022
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2022
…tion-cycle, r=cjgillot Do not report cycle error when inferring return type for suggestion The UI test is a good example of a case where this happens. The cycle is due to needing the value of the return type `-> _` to compute the variances of items in the crate, but then needing the variances of the items in the crate to do typechecking to infer what `-> _`'s real type is. Since we're already gonna emit an error in astconv, just delay the cycle bug as an error.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2022
…iaskrgr Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#99474 (Rustdoc json tests: New `@hasexact` test command) - rust-lang#99972 (interpret: only consider 1-ZST when searching for receiver) - rust-lang#100018 (Clean up `LitKind`) - rust-lang#100379 (triagebot: add translation-related mention groups) - rust-lang#100389 (Do not report cycle error when inferring return type for suggestion) - rust-lang#100489 (`is_knowable` use `Result` instead of `Option`) - rust-lang#100532 (unwind: don't build dependency when building for Miri) - rust-lang#100608 (needless separation of impl blocks) - rust-lang#100621 (Pass +atomics-32 feature for {arm,thumb}v4t-none-eabi) - rust-lang#100646 (Migrate emoji identifier diagnostics to `SessionDiagnostic` in rustc_interface) - rust-lang#100652 (Remove deferred sized checks (make them eager)) - rust-lang#100655 (Update books) - rust-lang#100656 (Update cargo) - rust-lang#100660 (Fixed a few documentation errors) - rust-lang#100661 (Fixed a few documentation errors) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This was referenced Dec 1, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The UI test is a good example of a case where this happens. The cycle is due to needing the value of the return type
-> _
to compute the variances of items in the crate, but then needing the variances of the items in the crate to do typechecking to infer what-> _
's real type is.Since we're already gonna emit an error in astconv, just delay the cycle bug as an error.