-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test that we cannot use trait impl methods arguments as defining uses #106676
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @dtolnay (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 118c626263e0d06632a26c1ece6e36b02df15b12 has been approved by It is now in the queue for this repository. |
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 50. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened. |
Rebased. |
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#106167 (Fix invalid syntax and incomplete suggestion in impl Trait parameter type suggestions for E0311) - rust-lang#106309 (Prefer non-`[type error]` candidates during selection) - rust-lang#106532 (Allow codegen to unsize `dyn*` to `dyn`) - rust-lang#106596 (Hide more of long types in E0271) - rust-lang#106638 (std tests: use __OsLocalKeyInner from realstd) - rust-lang#106676 (Test that we cannot use trait impl methods arguments as defining uses) - rust-lang#106702 (Conserve cause of `ImplDerivedObligation` in E0599) - rust-lang#106732 (rustc_llvm: replace llvm::makeArrayRef with ArrayRef constructors.) - rust-lang#106733 (Revert "warn newer available version of the x tool") - rust-lang#106748 (Clean up `OnUnimplementedFormatString::verify`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Addresses #63063 (comment)
r? @dtolnay