Rollup of 6 pull requests #107625
Merged
Rollup of 6 pull requests #107625
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Based on a couple of sources: - https://swatinem.de/blog/future-size/ - rust-lang#62958
…g#106572 Adding Adding Fixing small issues for PR Adding tests Removing unused binding Changing the wording on note Fixing PR comment
Suggest `move` in nested closure when appropriate Fix rust-lang#64008.
Suggest `{var:?}` when finding `{?:var}` in inline format strings
Link to issue: rust-lang#106572
This is my first PR to this project, so hopefully I can get some good pointers with me from the first PR.
Currently my idea was to test out whether or not this is the correct solution to this issue and then hopefully expand upon the idea to not only work for Debug formatting but for all of them. If this is a valid solution, I will create a new issue to give a better error message to a broader range of wrong-order formatting.
…est, r=compiler-errors Add tests to assert current behavior of large future sizes Based on a couple of sources: - https://swatinem.de/blog/future-size/ - rust-lang#62958
…r=thomcc Fix benchmarks in library/core with black_box Fixes rust-lang#107590
…ler-errors Parse and recover from type ascription in patterns Reintroduce part of rust-lang#106960, which was reverted in rust-lang#107478. r? `@compiler-errors`
Use triple rather than arch for fuchsia test-runner This allows the user of the test-runner script to specify a full triple rather than just an architecture which helps with the transition from the two component to three component target triples for fuchsia.
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR: previous master: 5d32458343 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (7c46fb2): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
movein nested closure when appropriate #106575 (Suggestmovein nested closure when appropriate){var:?}when finding{?:var}in inline format strings #106805 (Suggest{var:?}when finding{?:var}in inline format strings)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup