Rollup of 6 pull requests

[TaKO8Ki]

Successful merges:

• Fixup Atomic*::from_ptr safety docs #116762 (Fixup Atomic*::from_ptr safety docs)
• Extend builtin/auto trait args with error when they have >1 argument #117645 (Extend builtin/auto trait args with error when they have >1 argument)
• Move BorrowedBuf and BorrowedCursor from std:io to core::io #117694 (Move BorrowedBuf and BorrowedCursor from std:io to core::io)
• triagebot.toml: use inclusive language #117705 (triagebot.toml: use inclusive language)
• speed up x clean #117723 (speed up x clean)
• Restore rustc shim error message #117724 (Restore rustc shim error message)

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[TaKO8Ki]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=6

[bors]

📌 Commit f5195c5 has been approved by TaKO8Ki

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit f5195c5 with merge 492e57c...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: TaKO8Ki
Pushing 492e57c to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Message	Perf Build Sha
#116762	Fixup Atomic*::from_ptr safety docs	45eb2c211cd62e86bdab6b4d688f768494e30cff (link)
#117645	Extend builtin/auto trait args with error when they have >1…	368f768b3822d9e623706db4aff8a3b0f2bea44b (link)
#117694	Move BorrowedBuf and BorrowedCursor from std:io to `c…	7e928eea35f3ba4abecf49b505357ad6792cdcd8 (link)
#117705	triagebot.toml: use inclusive language	4ef323d95d9560d9a710e96e2fe45394045188fa (link)
#117723	speed up x clean	857f2affd3d53ee4938d4ee4458d79e6743ad83d (link)
#117724	Restore rustc shim error message	00575dc86e79a7378de5646affb0989e117aa6c6 (link)

previous master: d8dbf7ca0e

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (492e57c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.2%, 0.5%]	5
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.6%	[0.6%, 0.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.4%	[0.2%, 0.5%]	5

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.8%	[0.8%, 2.5%]	4
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.8%	[0.9%, 4.6%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-0.5%, -0.4%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.1%	[-1.3%, -0.8%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.0%	[-0.5%, 2.5%]	6

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-1.4%, -0.4%]	11
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-13.5%	[-13.6%, -13.4%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-1.4%, -0.4%]	11

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 663.177s -> 664.787s (0.24%)
Artifact size: 308.73 MiB -> 308.65 MiB (-0.03%)

[rylev]

The only PR that includes actual changes to the compiler is #117645.

@rust-timer build 368f768

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (368f768): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.2%, 0.5%]	6
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.5%	[0.5%, 0.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.4%	[0.2%, 0.5%]	6

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.9%	[0.4%, 2.1%]	6
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.8%	[-1.0%, -0.4%]	6
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.3%	[-4.3%, -4.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.0%	[-1.0%, 2.1%]	12

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-1.0%, -0.4%]	8
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-12.6%	[-12.6%, -12.6%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-1.0%, -0.4%]	8

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 663.177s -> 665.964s (0.42%)
Artifact size: 308.73 MiB -> 308.76 MiB (0.01%)

[rylev]

@compiler-errors @petrochenkov it looks like #117645 was the cause of these small regressions. Not sure if it's worth addressing though. Thoughts?