Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TRPL: make version constraits explicit #26892

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2015
Merged

Conversation

steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

We weren't explicit enough about Cargo's default version behavior.

For rust-lang/rust at least,

Fixes #26482

We weren't explicit enough about Cargo's default version behavior.

For rust-lang/rust at least,

Fixes rust-lang#26482
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @pcwalton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ 1ae7702

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: rollup

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2015
We weren't explicit enough about Cargo's default version behavior.

For rust-lang/rust at least,

Fixes rust-lang#26482
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 1ae7702 into rust-lang:master Jul 8, 2015
numbers. If we wanted to use the latest version we could use `*` or we could use a range
of versions. [Cargo’s documentation][cargodoc] contains more details.
numbers. If we wanted to use only `0.3.0` exactly, we could use `=0.3.0`. If we
wanted to use the latest version we could use `*`; We could use a range of

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wanted to use the latest version we could use `*`; We could use a range of

typo in ; We

wanted to use the latest version we could use `*`; we could use a range of

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants