-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove unification despite ambiguity in projection #33555
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #33425) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 4e5a2e0 has been approved by |
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 12, 2016
…sakis Remove unification despite ambiguity in projection Turns out that closures aren't explicitly considered in `project.rs`, so the ambiguity handling w.r.t. closures can just be removed as the change done in `select.rs` covers it. r? @nikomatsakis
eddyb
added a commit
to eddyb/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 12, 2016
…sakis Remove unification despite ambiguity in projection Turns out that closures aren't explicitly considered in `project.rs`, so the ambiguity handling w.r.t. closures can just be removed as the change done in `select.rs` covers it. r? @nikomatsakis
eddyb
added a commit
to eddyb/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2016
…sakis Remove unification despite ambiguity in projection Turns out that closures aren't explicitly considered in `project.rs`, so the ambiguity handling w.r.t. closures can just be removed as the change done in `select.rs` covers it. r? @nikomatsakis
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2016
…sakis Remove unification despite ambiguity in projection Turns out that closures aren't explicitly considered in `project.rs`, so the ambiguity handling w.r.t. closures can just be removed as the change done in `select.rs` covers it. r? @nikomatsakis
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Turns out that closures aren't explicitly considered in
project.rs
, so the ambiguity handling w.r.t. closures can just be removed as the change done inselect.rs
covers it.r? @nikomatsakis