Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix some typos in Nomicon #38994

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2017
Merged

Fix some typos in Nomicon #38994

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2017

Conversation

BenWiederhake
Copy link
Contributor

I waited a bit before creating this PR in case I find more typos – I didn't.

I've read CONTRIBUTING.md but didn't make check, and make doc takes incredibly long. (Among other things, make doc builds llvm from scratch. Not sure if that's intentional.)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ lifetime can be regarded as `'static`.

Almost no reference is `'static`, so this is probably wrong. `transmute` and
`transmute_copy` are the two other primary offenders. One should endeavor to
bound an unbounded lifetime as quick as possible, especially across function
bind an unbounded lifetime as quickly as possible, especially across function
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think bound is correct here. cf. "If an output lifetime is elided, then it must be bounded by an input lifetime." below.

@BenWiederhake
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, my fault, apparently I misread it three times >_<

I acknowledge that "squashing it in the end" is usually preferred, according to #rust-beginners, but here amending was more meaningful. Yell if I'm wrong.

@BenWiederhake
Copy link
Contributor Author

Apparently this didn't trigger a new review request. Anyway: @sanxiyn: is this good?

@sanxiyn
Copy link
Member

sanxiyn commented Jan 12, 2017

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 12, 2017

📌 Commit 09df83b has been approved by sanxiyn

GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2017
Fix some typos in Nomicon

I waited a bit before creating this PR in case I find more typos – I didn't.

I've read `CONTRIBUTING.md` but didn't `make check`, and `make doc` takes incredibly long. (Among other things, `make doc` builds llvm from scratch.  Not sure if that's intentional.)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2017
Rollup of 10 pull requests

- Successful merges: #38362, #38636, #38877, #38946, #38965, #38986, #38994, #38995, #39024, #39027
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 09df83b into rust-lang:master Jan 14, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants