-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
test that rustdoc doesn't overflow on a big enum #55568
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
e36741d
to
273930e
Compare
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 273930e has been approved by |
test that rustdoc doesn't overflow on a big enum Adds a test to close rust-lang#25295. The test case depended on `enum_primitive` so I just basically pulled its source into an auxiliary file, is that the right way to do it?
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #54162 (Hide default impls items) - #55555 (Make `-Z ls` list the actual filename of external dependencies) - #55567 (add test for deriving Debug on uninhabited enum) - #55568 (test that rustdoc doesn't overflow on a big enum) - #55598 (publish-toolstate: ping maintainers when a tool builds again) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Adds a test to close #25295. The test case depended on
enum_primitive
so I just basically pulled its source into an auxiliary file, is that the right way to do it?