Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement new asm! syntax from RFC 2850 #69171

Merged
merged 36 commits into from
May 19, 2020
Merged

Implement new asm! syntax from RFC 2850 #69171

merged 36 commits into from
May 19, 2020

Conversation

Amanieu
Copy link
Member

@Amanieu Amanieu commented Feb 14, 2020

This PR implements the new asm! syntax proposed in rust-lang/rfcs#2850.

Design

A large part of this PR revolves around taking an asm! macro invocation and plumbing it through all of the compiler layers down to LLVM codegen. Throughout the various stages, an InlineAsm generally consists of 3 components:

  • The template string, which is stored as an array of InlineAsmTemplatePiece. Each piece represents either a literal or a placeholder for an operand (just like format strings).
pub enum InlineAsmTemplatePiece {
    String(String),
    Placeholder { operand_idx: usize, modifier: Option<char>, span: Span },
}
  • The list of operands to the asm! (in, [late]out, in[late]out, sym, const). These are represented differently at each stage of lowering, but follow a common pattern:

    • in, out and inout all have an associated register class (reg) or explicit register ("eax").
    • inout has 2 forms: one with a single expression that is both read from and written to, and one with two separate expressions for the input and output parts.
    • out and inout have a late flag (lateout / inlateout) to indicate that the register allocator is allowed to reuse an input register for this output.
    • out and the split variant of inout allow _ to be specified for an output, which means that the output is discarded. This is used to allocate scratch registers for assembly code.
    • sym is a bit special since it only accepts a path expression, which must point to a static or a fn.
  • The options set at the end of the asm! macro. The only one that is particularly of interest to rustc is NORETURN which makes asm! return ! instead of ().

bitflags::bitflags! {
    pub struct InlineAsmOptions: u8 {
        const PURE = 1 << 0;
        const NOMEM = 1 << 1;
        const READONLY = 1 << 2;
        const PRESERVES_FLAGS = 1 << 3;
        const NORETURN = 1 << 4;
        const NOSTACK = 1 << 5;
    }
}

AST

InlineAsm is represented as an expression in the AST:

pub struct InlineAsm {
    pub template: Vec<InlineAsmTemplatePiece>,
    pub operands: Vec<(InlineAsmOperand, Span)>,
    pub options: InlineAsmOptions,
}

pub enum InlineAsmRegOrRegClass {
    Reg(Symbol),
    RegClass(Symbol),
}

pub enum InlineAsmOperand {
    In {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        expr: P<Expr>,
    },
    Out {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        expr: Option<P<Expr>>,
    },
    InOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        expr: P<Expr>,
    },
    SplitInOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        in_expr: P<Expr>,
        out_expr: Option<P<Expr>>,
    },
    Const {
        expr: P<Expr>,
    },
    Sym {
        expr: P<Expr>,
    },
}

The asm! macro is implemented in librustc_builtin_macros and outputs an InlineAsm AST node. The template string is parsed using libfmt_macros, positional and named operands are resolved to explicit operand indicies. Since target information is not available to macro invocations, validation of the registers and register classes is deferred to AST lowering.

HIR

InlineAsm is represented as an expression in the HIR:

pub struct InlineAsm<'hir> {
    pub template: &'hir [InlineAsmTemplatePiece],
    pub operands: &'hir [InlineAsmOperand<'hir>],
    pub options: InlineAsmOptions,
}

pub enum InlineAsmRegOrRegClass {
    Reg(InlineAsmReg),
    RegClass(InlineAsmRegClass),
}

pub enum InlineAsmOperand<'hir> {
    In {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        expr: Expr<'hir>,
    },
    Out {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        expr: Option<Expr<'hir>>,
    },
    InOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        expr: Expr<'hir>,
    },
    SplitInOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        in_expr: Expr<'hir>,
        out_expr: Option<Expr<'hir>>,
    },
    Const {
        expr: Expr<'hir>,
    },
    Sym {
        expr: Expr<'hir>,
    },
}

AST lowering is where InlineAsmRegOrRegClass is converted from Symbols to an actual register or register class. If any modifiers are specified for a template string placeholder, these are validated against the set allowed for that operand type. Finally, explicit registers for inputs and outputs are checked for conflicts (same register used for different operands).

Type checking

Each register class has a whitelist of types that it may be used with. After the types of all operands have been determined, the intrinsicck pass will check that these types are in the whitelist. It also checks that split inout operands have compatible types and that const operands are integers or floats. Suggestions are emitted where needed if a template modifier should be used for an operand based on the type that was passed into it.

HAIR

InlineAsm is represented as an expression in the HAIR:

crate enum ExprKind<'tcx> {
    // [..]
    InlineAsm {
        template: &'tcx [InlineAsmTemplatePiece],
        operands: Vec<InlineAsmOperand<'tcx>>,
        options: InlineAsmOptions,
    },
}
crate enum InlineAsmOperand<'tcx> {
    In {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        expr: ExprRef<'tcx>,
    },
    Out {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        expr: Option<ExprRef<'tcx>>,
    },
    InOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        expr: ExprRef<'tcx>,
    },
    SplitInOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        in_expr: ExprRef<'tcx>,
        out_expr: Option<ExprRef<'tcx>>,
    },
    Const {
        expr: ExprRef<'tcx>,
    },
    SymFn {
        expr: ExprRef<'tcx>,
    },
    SymStatic {
        expr: ExprRef<'tcx>,
    },
}

The only significant change compared to HIR is that Sym has been lowered to either a SymFn whose expr is a Literal ZST of the fn, or a SymStatic whose expr is a StaticRef.

MIR

InlineAsm is represented as a Terminator in the MIR:

pub enum TerminatorKind<'tcx> {
    // [..]

    /// Block ends with an inline assembly block. This is a terminator since
    /// inline assembly is allowed to diverge.
    InlineAsm {
        /// The template for the inline assembly, with placeholders.
        template: &'tcx [InlineAsmTemplatePiece],

        /// The operands for the inline assembly, as `Operand`s or `Place`s.
        operands: Vec<InlineAsmOperand<'tcx>>,

        /// Miscellaneous options for the inline assembly.
        options: InlineAsmOptions,

        /// Destination block after the inline assembly returns, unless it is
        /// diverging (InlineAsmOptions::NORETURN).
        destination: Option<BasicBlock>,
    },
}

pub enum InlineAsmOperand<'tcx> {
    In {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        value: Operand<'tcx>,
    },
    Out {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        place: Option<Place<'tcx>>,
    },
    InOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        in_value: Operand<'tcx>,
        out_place: Option<Place<'tcx>>,
    },
    Const {
        value: Operand<'tcx>,
    },
    SymFn {
        value: Box<Constant<'tcx>>,
    },
    SymStatic {
        value: Box<Constant<'tcx>>,
    },
}

As part of HAIR lowering, InOut and SplitInOut operands are lowered to a split form with a separate in_value and out_place.

Semantically, the InlineAsm terminator is similar to the Call terminator except that it has multiple output places where a Call only has a single return place output.

The constant promotion pass is used to ensure that const operands are actually constants (using the same logic as #[rustc_args_required_const]).

Codegen

Operands are lowered one more time before being passed to LLVM codegen:

pub enum InlineAsmOperandRef<'tcx, B: BackendTypes + ?Sized> {
    In {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        value: OperandRef<'tcx, B::Value>,
    },
    Out {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        place: Option<PlaceRef<'tcx, B::Value>>,
    },
    InOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        in_value: OperandRef<'tcx, B::Value>,
        out_place: Option<PlaceRef<'tcx, B::Value>>,
    },
    Const {
        string: String,
    },
    SymFn {
        instance: Instance<'tcx>,
    },
    SymStatic {
        def_id: DefId,
    },
}

The operands are lowered to LLVM operands and constraint codes as follow:

  • out and the output part of inout operands are added first, as required by LLVM. Late output operands have a = prefix added to their constraint code, non-late output operands have a =& prefix added to their constraint code.
  • in operands are added normally.
  • inout operands are tied to the matching output operand.
  • sym operands are passed as function pointers or pointers, using the "s" constraint.
  • const operands are formatted to a string and directly inserted in the template string.

The template string is converted to LLVM form:

  • $ characters are escaped as $$.
  • const operands are converted to strings and inserted directly.
  • Placeholders are formatted as ${X:M} where X is the operand index and M is the modifier character. Modifiers are converted from the Rust form to the LLVM form.

The various options are converted to clobber constraints or LLVM attributes, refer to the RFC for more details.

Note that LLVM is sometimes rather picky about what types it accepts for certain constraint codes so we sometimes need to insert conversions to/from a supported type. See the target-specific ISelLowering.cpp files in LLVM for details.

Adding support for new architectures

Adding inline assembly support to an architecture is mostly a matter of defining the registers and register classes for that architecture. All the definitions for register classes are located in src/librustc_target/asm/.

Additionally you will need to implement lowering of these register classes to LLVM constraint codes in src/librustc_codegen_llvm/asm.rs.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Some changes occurred in diagnostic error codes

cc @GuillaumeGomez

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @cramertj

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 14, 2020
@cramertj
Copy link
Member

r? @oli-obk or @nagisa maybe?

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned oli-obk and unassigned cramertj Feb 14, 2020
src/libcore/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Feb 15, 2020

I’ll be reviewing this per-commit and fairly slowly as I have time to dig into it, so the comments will come in as a trickle.

@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@Amanieu Amanieu force-pushed the new-asm branch 2 times, most recently from 3659d06 to 6577651 Compare February 18, 2020 00:37
@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@Amanieu Amanieu force-pushed the new-asm branch 4 times, most recently from 39c9b66 to a375636 Compare February 21, 2020 23:30
@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@Amanieu Amanieu force-pushed the new-asm branch 5 times, most recently from 1b08cb9 to 8b79d87 Compare February 24, 2020 21:26
@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label May 19, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 19, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 1cfdc7e with merge 3a7dfda...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 19, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-azure
Approved by: nagisa,nikomatsakis
Pushing 3a7dfda to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 19, 2020
@bors bors mentioned this pull request May 19, 2020
8 tasks
@bors bors merged commit 3a7dfda into rust-lang:master May 19, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang/rust-clippy that referenced this pull request May 20, 2020
Downgrade `match_wild_err_arm` to pedantic and update help messages

Hi,
This fixes #3688 and downgrades `match_wild_err_arm` to pedantic.
There are a lot of different reasons in that issue, for me the biggest are:
1. Rust's errors aren't like Java's exceptions because they're type safe and in most cases the type of error can't change by itself.
2. Sometimes matching can be more ergonomic, and before the `track_caller` feature got introduced it was actually easier to track the panic location with explicit `panic!` than with `expect`.

Currently clippy is failing to build because of a breaking change in rust-lang/rust#69171 I tried fixing it but it is too complex for my little knowledge of clippy and rustc so I'll leave that to people who know what they're doing :)

Another thing, if rustc is breaking clippy a lot then maybe it's better to use something like `miri` does, where it's hard codes the latest tested rustc commit and they keep bumping it, that way when you develop locally it should work even if there was a breaking change (https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/blob/master/rustup-toolchain#L23-L29)

changelog: Downgrade `match_wild_err_arm` to pedantic
@Voultapher
Copy link
Contributor

Disclaimer I'm fairly new to the world of inline assembly, and thanks everyone for their work. The design seems well thought out. Playing around with some of the examples in the RFC, I couldn't help but ask myself https://godbolt.org/z/38kS-H is this really as good as the code gen is supposed to get? It seems that most of the bloat comes from the 128 bit 'reassembling' https://godbolt.org/z/3ZgH4N, I guess this isn't the place to discuss that, I'd appreciate it if someone could point me to the appropriate issue PR etc.

@jethrogb
Copy link
Contributor

@Voultapher your codegen is clearly not related to inline assembly as your 2nd example shows. Try (hi as u128).wrapping_shl(64) and please continue the discussion elsewhere.

@Voultapher
Copy link
Contributor

I agree, please point me to that elsewhere.

@phil-opp
Copy link
Contributor

I think the best place for such a discussion is https://users.rust-lang.org/.

flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request May 27, 2020
Implement new asm! syntax from RFC 2850

This PR implements the new `asm!` syntax proposed in rust-lang/rfcs#2850.

# Design

A large part of this PR revolves around taking an `asm!` macro invocation and plumbing it through all of the compiler layers down to LLVM codegen. Throughout the various stages, an `InlineAsm` generally consists of 3 components:

- The template string, which is stored as an array of `InlineAsmTemplatePiece`. Each piece represents either a literal or a placeholder for an operand (just like format strings).
```rust
pub enum InlineAsmTemplatePiece {
    String(String),
    Placeholder { operand_idx: usize, modifier: Option<char>, span: Span },
}
```

- The list of operands to the `asm!` (`in`, `[late]out`, `in[late]out`, `sym`, `const`). These are represented differently at each stage of lowering, but follow a common pattern:
  - `in`, `out` and `inout` all have an associated register class (`reg`) or explicit register (`"eax"`).
  - `inout` has 2 forms: one with a single expression that is both read from and written to, and one with two separate expressions for the input and output parts.
  - `out` and `inout` have a `late` flag (`lateout` / `inlateout`) to indicate that the register allocator is allowed to reuse an input register for this output.
  - `out` and the split variant of `inout` allow `_` to be specified for an output, which means that the output is discarded. This is used to allocate scratch registers for assembly code.
  - `sym` is a bit special since it only accepts a path expression, which must point to a `static` or a `fn`.

- The options set at the end of the `asm!` macro. The only one that is particularly of interest to rustc is `NORETURN` which makes `asm!` return `!` instead of `()`.
```rust
bitflags::bitflags! {
    pub struct InlineAsmOptions: u8 {
        const PURE = 1 << 0;
        const NOMEM = 1 << 1;
        const READONLY = 1 << 2;
        const PRESERVES_FLAGS = 1 << 3;
        const NORETURN = 1 << 4;
        const NOSTACK = 1 << 5;
    }
}
```

## AST

`InlineAsm` is represented as an expression in the AST:

```rust
pub struct InlineAsm {
    pub template: Vec<InlineAsmTemplatePiece>,
    pub operands: Vec<(InlineAsmOperand, Span)>,
    pub options: InlineAsmOptions,
}

pub enum InlineAsmRegOrRegClass {
    Reg(Symbol),
    RegClass(Symbol),
}

pub enum InlineAsmOperand {
    In {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        expr: P<Expr>,
    },
    Out {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        expr: Option<P<Expr>>,
    },
    InOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        expr: P<Expr>,
    },
    SplitInOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        in_expr: P<Expr>,
        out_expr: Option<P<Expr>>,
    },
    Const {
        expr: P<Expr>,
    },
    Sym {
        expr: P<Expr>,
    },
}
```

The `asm!` macro is implemented in librustc_builtin_macros and outputs an `InlineAsm` AST node. The template string is parsed using libfmt_macros, positional and named operands are resolved to explicit operand indicies. Since target information is not available to macro invocations, validation of the registers and register classes is deferred to AST lowering.

## HIR

`InlineAsm` is represented as an expression in the HIR:

```rust
pub struct InlineAsm<'hir> {
    pub template: &'hir [InlineAsmTemplatePiece],
    pub operands: &'hir [InlineAsmOperand<'hir>],
    pub options: InlineAsmOptions,
}

pub enum InlineAsmRegOrRegClass {
    Reg(InlineAsmReg),
    RegClass(InlineAsmRegClass),
}

pub enum InlineAsmOperand<'hir> {
    In {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        expr: Expr<'hir>,
    },
    Out {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        expr: Option<Expr<'hir>>,
    },
    InOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        expr: Expr<'hir>,
    },
    SplitInOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        in_expr: Expr<'hir>,
        out_expr: Option<Expr<'hir>>,
    },
    Const {
        expr: Expr<'hir>,
    },
    Sym {
        expr: Expr<'hir>,
    },
}
```

AST lowering is where `InlineAsmRegOrRegClass` is converted from `Symbol`s to an actual register or register class. If any modifiers are specified for a template string placeholder, these are validated against the set allowed for that operand type. Finally, explicit registers for inputs and outputs are checked for conflicts (same register used for different operands).

## Type checking

Each register class has a whitelist of types that it may be used with. After the types of all operands have been determined, the `intrinsicck` pass will check that these types are in the whitelist. It also checks that split `inout` operands have compatible types and that `const` operands are integers or floats. Suggestions are emitted where needed if a template modifier should be used for an operand based on the type that was passed into it.

## HAIR

`InlineAsm` is represented as an expression in the HAIR:

```rust
crate enum ExprKind<'tcx> {
    // [..]
    InlineAsm {
        template: &'tcx [InlineAsmTemplatePiece],
        operands: Vec<InlineAsmOperand<'tcx>>,
        options: InlineAsmOptions,
    },
}
crate enum InlineAsmOperand<'tcx> {
    In {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        expr: ExprRef<'tcx>,
    },
    Out {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        expr: Option<ExprRef<'tcx>>,
    },
    InOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        expr: ExprRef<'tcx>,
    },
    SplitInOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        in_expr: ExprRef<'tcx>,
        out_expr: Option<ExprRef<'tcx>>,
    },
    Const {
        expr: ExprRef<'tcx>,
    },
    SymFn {
        expr: ExprRef<'tcx>,
    },
    SymStatic {
        expr: ExprRef<'tcx>,
    },
}
```

The only significant change compared to HIR is that `Sym` has been lowered to either a `SymFn` whose `expr` is a `Literal` ZST of the `fn`, or a `SymStatic` whose `expr` is a `StaticRef`.

## MIR

`InlineAsm` is represented as a `Terminator` in the MIR:

```rust
pub enum TerminatorKind<'tcx> {
    // [..]

    /// Block ends with an inline assembly block. This is a terminator since
    /// inline assembly is allowed to diverge.
    InlineAsm {
        /// The template for the inline assembly, with placeholders.
        template: &'tcx [InlineAsmTemplatePiece],

        /// The operands for the inline assembly, as `Operand`s or `Place`s.
        operands: Vec<InlineAsmOperand<'tcx>>,

        /// Miscellaneous options for the inline assembly.
        options: InlineAsmOptions,

        /// Destination block after the inline assembly returns, unless it is
        /// diverging (InlineAsmOptions::NORETURN).
        destination: Option<BasicBlock>,
    },
}

pub enum InlineAsmOperand<'tcx> {
    In {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        value: Operand<'tcx>,
    },
    Out {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        place: Option<Place<'tcx>>,
    },
    InOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        in_value: Operand<'tcx>,
        out_place: Option<Place<'tcx>>,
    },
    Const {
        value: Operand<'tcx>,
    },
    SymFn {
        value: Box<Constant<'tcx>>,
    },
    SymStatic {
        value: Box<Constant<'tcx>>,
    },
}
```

As part of HAIR lowering, `InOut` and `SplitInOut` operands are lowered to a split form with a separate `in_value` and `out_place`.

Semantically, the `InlineAsm` terminator is similar to the `Call` terminator except that it has multiple output places where a `Call` only has a single return place output.

The constant promotion pass is used to ensure that `const` operands are actually constants (using the same logic as `#[rustc_args_required_const]`).

## Codegen

Operands are lowered one more time before being passed to LLVM codegen:

```rust
pub enum InlineAsmOperandRef<'tcx, B: BackendTypes + ?Sized> {
    In {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        value: OperandRef<'tcx, B::Value>,
    },
    Out {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        place: Option<PlaceRef<'tcx, B::Value>>,
    },
    InOut {
        reg: InlineAsmRegOrRegClass,
        late: bool,
        in_value: OperandRef<'tcx, B::Value>,
        out_place: Option<PlaceRef<'tcx, B::Value>>,
    },
    Const {
        string: String,
    },
    SymFn {
        instance: Instance<'tcx>,
    },
    SymStatic {
        def_id: DefId,
    },
}
```

The operands are lowered to LLVM operands and constraint codes as follow:
- `out` and the output part of `inout` operands are added first, as required by LLVM. Late output operands have a `=` prefix added to their constraint code, non-late output operands have a `=&` prefix added to their constraint code.
- `in` operands are added normally.
- `inout` operands are tied to the matching output operand.
- `sym` operands are passed as function pointers or pointers, using the `"s"` constraint.
- `const` operands are formatted to a string and directly inserted in the template string.

The template string is converted to LLVM form:
- `$` characters are escaped as `$$`.
- `const` operands are converted to strings and inserted directly.
- Placeholders are formatted as `${X:M}` where `X` is the operand index and `M` is the modifier character. Modifiers are converted from the Rust form to the LLVM form.

The various options are converted to clobber constraints or LLVM attributes, refer to the [RFC](https://github.com/Amanieu/rfcs/blob/inline-asm/text/0000-inline-asm.md#mapping-to-llvm-ir) for more details.

Note that LLVM is sometimes rather picky about what types it accepts for certain constraint codes so we sometimes need to insert conversions to/from a supported type. See the target-specific ISelLowering.cpp files in LLVM for details.

# Adding support for new architectures

Adding inline assembly support to an architecture is mostly a matter of defining the registers and register classes for that architecture. All the definitions for register classes are located in `src/librustc_target/asm/`.

Additionally you will need to implement lowering of these register classes to LLVM constraint codes in `src/librustc_codegen_llvm/asm.rs`.
raoulstrackx pushed a commit to fortanix/dlmalloc-rs that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-lang Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.