-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #83714
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #83714
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
revert file bless with nll mode
More links, one more occurrence of “a OsString” Co-authored-by: Yuki Okushi <huyuumi.dev@gmail.com>
Just a small bug fix for opcode numberings, not too major.
Add allocation information to undefined behaviour errors. So far I'm looking on information on whether the error messages are suitable. Fixes rust-lang#53325.
…r=estebank give full path of constraint in suggest_constraining_type_param close rust-lang#83513
Add a regression test for issue-68830 Closes rust-lang#68830
…on_documentation, r=JohnTitor Fix documentation of conversion from String to OsString From [this question on URLO](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/does-converting-a-string-into-a-pathbuf-allocate-new-buffer/57678), I noticed that the documentation of `From<String> for OsString` incorrectly claims to be copying data. `@rustbot` modify labels: T-doc, T-libs
…get-error, r=davidtwco Clarify `--print target-list` is a rustc's option Fixes rust-lang#68238
…dates, r=nikic Update LLVM with another wasm simd fix Just a small bug fix for opcode numberings, not too major.
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
📌 Commit cbdb5ef has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Mar 31, 2021
⌛ Testing commit cbdb5ef with merge 0a9b330dbc81791a619a79560f4b8ac8c37283cc... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Mar 31, 2021
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #76881) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
--print target-list
is a rustc's option #83711 (Clarify--print target-list
is a rustc's option)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup