-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 8 pull requests #88948
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 8 pull requests #88948
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This reverts commit 64acb7d.
This reverts commit d59b1f1.
This reverts commit 5b4bc05.
This reverts commit 8a1dd69.
…the impl block Currently, for the following code, the compiler produces the errors like the following error: ```rust struct Type<T> impl<T: Clone> Type<T> { fn const f() {} } ``` ```text error[E0658]: trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable --> ./test.rs:3:6 | 3 | impl<T: Clone> Type<T> { | ^ | = note: see issue rust-lang#57563 <rust-lang#57563> for more information = help: add `#![feature(const_fn_trait_bound)]` to the crate attributes to enable ``` This can be confusing (especially to newcomers) since the error mentions "const fn parameters", but highlights only the impl. This commits adds function highlighting, changing the error to the following: ```text error[E0658]: trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable --> ./test.rs:3:6 | 3 | impl<T: Clone> Type<T> { | ^ 4 | pub const fn f() {} | ---------------- function declared as const here | = note: see issue rust-lang#57563 <rust-lang#57563> for more information = help: add `#![feature(const_fn_trait_bound)]` to the crate attributes to enable ```
Since 88839 `min_align_of` is lowered to AlignOf operator.
…haelwoerister Introduce -Z remap-cwd-prefix switch This switch remaps any absolute paths rooted under the current working directory to a new value. This includes remapping the debug info in `DW_AT_comp_dir` and `DW_AT_decl_file`. Importantly, this flag does not require passing the current working directory to the compiler, such that the command line can be run on any machine (with the same input files) and produce the same results. This is critical property for debugging compiler issues that crop up on remote machines. This is based on adetaylor's rust-lang@dbc4ae7 Major Change Proposal: rust-lang/compiler-team#450 Discussed on rust-lang#38322. Would resolve issue rust-lang#87325.
…ports, r=Amanieu Remove `cfg(doc)` from std::os module reexports to fix rustdoc linking issues Fixes rust-lang#88304. I tested it based on rust-lang#88292. Not sure if it's the best approach, but at least it makes thing a bit simpler. cc ````@jyn514````
…xpr-parse, r=nagisa Accept `m!{ .. }.method()` and `m!{ .. }?` statements. This PR fixes something that I keep running into when using `quote!{}.into()` in a proc macro to convert the `proc_macro2::TokenStream` to a `proc_macro::TokenStream`: Before: ``` error: expected expression, found `.` --> src/lib.rs:6:6 | 4 | quote! { 5 | ... 6 | }.into() | ^ expected expression ``` After: ``` ``` (No output, compiles fine.) --- Context: For expressions like `{ 1 }` and `if true { 1 } else { 2 }`, we accept them as full statements without a trailing `;`, which means the following is not accepted: ```rust { 1 } - 1 // error ``` since that is parsed as two statements: `{ 1 }` and `-1`. Syntactically correct, but the type of `{ 1 }` should be `()` as there is no `;`. However, for specifically `.` and `?` after the `}`, we do [continue parsing it as an expression](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/13db8440bbbe42870bc828d4ec3e965b38670277/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs#L864-L876): ```rust { "abc" }.len(); // ok ``` For braced macro invocations, we do not do this: ```rust vec![1, 2, 3].len(); // ok vec!{1, 2, 3}.len(); // error ``` (It parses `vec!{1, 2, 3}` as a full statement, and then complains about `.len()` not being a valid expression.) This PR changes this to also look for a `.` and `?` after a braced macro invocation. We can be sure the macro is an expression and not a full statement in those cases, since no statement can start with a `.` or `?`.
… r=davidtwco Revert anon union parsing Revert PR rust-lang#84571 and rust-lang#85515, which implemented anonymous union parsing in a manner that broke the context-sensitivity for the `union` keyword and thus broke stable Rust code. Fix rust-lang#88583.
…r=estebank feat(rustc_typeck): suggest removing bad parens in `(recv.method)()` Fixes rust-lang#88803
…_a_bound_in_impl_block_error, r=estebank Highlight the `const fn` if error happened because of a bound on the impl block Currently, for the following code, the compiler produces the errors like the following: ```rust struct Type<T>(T); impl<T: Clone> Type<T> { const fn f() {} } ``` ```text error[E0658]: trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable --> ./test.rs:3:6 | 3 | impl<T: Clone> Type<T> { | ^ | = note: see issue rust-lang#57563 <rust-lang#57563> for more information = help: add `#![feature(const_fn_trait_bound)]` to the crate attributes to enable ``` This can be confusing (especially to newcomers) since the error mentions "const fn parameters", but highlights only the impl. This PR adds function highlighting, changing the error to the following: ```text error[E0658]: trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable --> ./test.rs:3:6 | 3 | impl<T: Clone> Type<T> { | ^ 4 | pub const fn f() {} | ---------------- function declared as const here | = note: see issue rust-lang#57563 <rust-lang#57563> for more information = help: add `#![feature(const_fn_trait_bound)]` to the crate attributes to enable ``` --- I've originally wanted to point directly to `const` token, but couldn't find a way to get it's span. It seems like this span is lost during the AST -> HIR lowering. Also, since the errors for object casts in `const fn`s (`&T` -> `&dyn Trait`) seem to trigger the same error, this PR accidentally changes these errors too. Not sure if it's desired or how to fix this. P.S. it's my first time contributing to diagnostics, so feedback is very appreciated! --- r? `@estebank` `@rustbot` label: +A-diagnostics
`Wrapping<T>` has the same layout and ABI as `T`
Remove implementation of `min_align_of` intrinsic Since rust-lang#88839 `min_align_of` is lowered to AlignOf operator.
@bors r+ p=2 |
📌 Commit 5050a2f has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Sep 14, 2021
⌛ Testing commit 5050a2f with merge e63d3d7581bdb6f629f01f8bafa6ec29e7ac97d8... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Sep 15, 2021
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
cfg(doc)
from std::os module reexports to fix rustdoc linking issues #88619 (Removecfg(doc)
from std::os module reexports to fix rustdoc linking issues)m!{ .. }.method()
andm!{ .. }?
statements. #88690 (Acceptm!{ .. }.method()
andm!{ .. }?
statements. )(recv.method)()
#88841 (feat(rustc_typeck): suggest removing bad parens in(recv.method)()
)const fn
if error happened because of a bound on the impl block #88907 (Highlight theconst fn
if error happened because of a bound on the impl block)Wrapping<T>
has the same layout and ABI asT
#88915 (Wrapping<T>
has the same layout and ABI asT
)min_align_of
intrinsic #88933 (Remove implementation ofmin_align_of
intrinsic)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup