Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #92471

Merged
merged 60 commits into from
Jan 1, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 7 pull requests #92471

merged 60 commits into from
Jan 1, 2022

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

cjgillot and others added 30 commits September 30, 2021 20:22
Before this commit all vtables would have the same name "vtable" in
debuginfo. Now they get a name that identifies the implementing type
and the trait that is being implemented.
…info, r=wesleywiser

Create more accurate debuginfo for vtables.

Before this PR all vtables would have the same name (`"vtable"`) in debuginfo. Now they get an unambiguous name that identifies the implementing type and the trait that is being implemented.

This is only one of several possible improvements:
- This PR describes vtables as arrays of `*const u8` pointers. It would nice to describe them as structs where function pointer is represented by a field with a name indicative of the method it maps to. However, this requires coming up with a naming scheme that avoids clashes between methods with the same name (which is possible if the vtable contains multiple traits).
- The PR does not update the debuginfo we generate for the vtable-pointer field in a fat `dyn` pointer. Right now there does not seem to be an easy way of getting ahold of a vtable-layout without also knowing the concrete self-type of a trait object.

r? `@wesleywiser`
As per the libs team decision in rust-lang#58935.

Closes rust-lang#58935
This commit adds LLVM Control Flow Integrity (CFI) support to the Rust
compiler. It initially provides forward-edge control flow protection for
Rust-compiled code only by aggregating function pointers in groups
identified by their number of arguments.

Forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust -compiled
code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust -compiled code
share the same virtual address space) will be provided in later work as
part of this project by defining and using compatible type identifiers
(see Type metadata in the design document in the tracking issue rust-lang#89653).

LLVM CFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=cfi and requires LTO (i.e.,
-Clto).
Add LLVM CFI support to the Rust compiler

This PR adds LLVM Control Flow Integrity (CFI) support to the Rust compiler. It initially provides forward-edge control flow protection for Rust-compiled code only by aggregating function pointers in groups identified by their number of arguments.

Forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust -compiled code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust -compiled code share the same virtual address space) will be provided in later work as part of this project by defining and using compatible type identifiers (see Type metadata in the design document in the tracking issue rust-lang#89653).

LLVM CFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=cfi and requires LTO (i.e., -Clto).

Thank you, `@eddyb` and `@pcc,` for all the help!
* Rebase fallout.

* Move rustc_middle::middle::cstore to rustc_session.

* Create more accurate debuginfo for vtables.

Before this commit all vtables would have the same name "vtable" in
debuginfo. Now they get a name that identifies the implementing type
and the trait that is being implemented.

* Remove alloc::prelude

As per the libs team decision in rust-lang#58935.

Closes rust-lang#58935

* Make hash_result an Option.

* Properly check `target_features` not to trigger an assertion

* Add LLVM CFI support to the Rust compiler

This commit adds LLVM Control Flow Integrity (CFI) support to the Rust
compiler. It initially provides forward-edge control flow protection for
Rust-compiled code only by aggregating function pointers in groups
identified by their number of arguments.

Forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust -compiled
code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust -compiled code
share the same virtual address space) will be provided in later work as
part of this project by defining and using compatible type identifiers
(see Type metadata in the design document in the tracking issue rust-lang#89653).

LLVM CFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=cfi and requires LTO (i.e.,
-Clto).

* Update to nightly-2021-10-30

* Add deduplication of constant values as rustc relies on LLVM doing that

Co-authored-by: Camille GILLOT <gillot.camille@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Woerister <michaelwoerister@posteo>
Co-authored-by: Amanieu d'Antras <amanieu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuki Okushi <yuki.okushi@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: Ramon de C Valle <rcvalle@users.noreply.github.com>
fix sparc64 ABI for aggregates with floating point members

Fixes rust-lang#86163
We already use the object crate for generating uncompressed .rmeta
metadata object files. This switches the generation of compressed
.rustc object files to use the object crate as well. These have
slightly different requirements in that .rmeta should be completely
excluded from any final compilation artifacts, while .rustc should
be part of shared objects, but not loaded into memory.

The primary motivation for this change is rust-lang#90326: In LLVM 14, the
current way of setting section flags (and in particular, preventing
the setting of SHF_ALLOC) will no longer work. There are other ways
we could work around this, but switching to the object crate seems
like the most elegant, as we already use it for .rmeta, and as it
makes this independent of the codegen backend. In particular, we
don't need separate handling in codegen_llvm and codegen_gcc.
codegen_cranelift should be able to reuse the implementation as
well, though I have omitted that here, as it is not based on
codegen_ssa.

This change mostly extracts the existing code for .rmeta handling
to allow using it for .rustc as well, and adjust the codegen
infrastructure to handle the metadata object file separately: We
no longer create a backend-specific module for it, and directly
produce the compiled module instead.

This does not fix rust-lang#90326 by itself yet, as .llvmbc will need to be
handled separately.
Also restricts r8-r14 from being used on Thumb1 targets as per rust-lang#90736.
Use object crate for .rustc metadata generation

We already use the object crate for generating uncompressed .rmeta
metadata object files. This switches the generation of compressed
.rustc object files to use the object crate as well. These have
slightly different requirements in that .rmeta should be completely
excluded from any final compilation artifacts, while .rustc should
be part of shared objects, but not loaded into memory.

The primary motivation for this change is rust-lang#90326: In LLVM 14, the
current way of setting section flags (and in particular, preventing
the setting of SHF_ALLOC) will no longer work. There are other ways
we could work around this, but switching to the object crate seems
like the most elegant, as we already use it for .rmeta, and as it
makes this independent of the codegen backend. In particular, we
don't need separate handling in codegen_llvm and codegen_gcc.
codegen_cranelift should be able to reuse the implementation as
well, though I have omitted that here, as it is not based on
codegen_ssa.

This change mostly extracts the existing code for .rmeta handling
to allow using it for .rustc as well, and adjusts the codegen
infrastructure to handle the metadata object file separately: We
no longer create a backend-specific module for it, and directly
produce the compiled module instead.

This does not `fix` rust-lang#90326 by itself yet, as .llvmbc will need to be
handled separately.

r? `@nagisa`
…plett

Remove the reg_thumb register class for asm! on ARM

Also restricts r8-r14 from being used on Thumb1 targets as per rust-lang#90736.

cc ``@Lokathor``

r? ``@joshtriplett``
They are also removed from the prelude as per the decision in
rust-lang#87228.

stdarch and compiler-builtins are updated to work with the new, stable
asm! and global_asm! macros.
The resulting profile will include the crate name and will be stored in
the `--out-dir` directory.

This implementation makes it convenient to use LLVM time trace together
with cargo, in the contrast to the previous implementation which would
overwrite profiles or store them in `.cargo/registry/..`.
bjorn3 and others added 17 commits December 30, 2021 17:50
These only finish in reasonable time with optimizations enabled.

This patch file is copied from cg_clif.
rustc_interface already calls it for you
Prevent spurious build failures and other bugs caused by parallel runs of
x.py. We back the lock with sqlite, so that we have a cross-platform locking
strategy, and which can be done nearly first in the build process (from Python),
which helps move the lock as early as possible.
Remove existing problematic cases.
…Simulacrum

Lock bootstrap (x.py) build directory

Closes rust-lang#76661,  closes rust-lang#80849,
`x.py` creates a lock file at `project_root/lock.db`

r? `@jyn514` , because he was one that told me about this~
…8472

Implement split_at_spare_mut without Deref to a slice so that the spare slice is valid

~I'm not sure I understand what's going on here correctly. And I'm pretty sure this safety comment needs to be changed. I'm just referring to the same thing that `as_mut_ptr_range` does.~ (Thanks `@RalfJung` for the guidance and clearing things up)

I tried to run https://github.com/rust-lang/miri-test-libstd on alloc with -Zmiri-track-raw-pointers, and got a failure on the test `vec::test_extend_from_within`.

I minimized the test failure into this program:
```rust
#![feature(vec_split_at_spare)]
fn main() {
    Vec::<i32>::with_capacity(1).split_at_spare_mut();
}
```

The problem is that the existing implementation is actually getting a pointer range where both pointers are derived from the initialized region of the Vec's allocation, but we need the second one to be valid for the region between len and capacity. (thanks Ralf for clearing this up)
Fix double space in pretty printed TryBlock

Follow-up to rust-lang#92238 fixing one of the FIXMEs.

```rust
macro_rules! repro {
    ($expr:expr) => {
        stringify!($expr)
    };
}

fn main() {
    println!("{}", repro!(try {}));
}
```

Before:&ensp;<code>try&nbsp;&nbsp;{}</code>
After:&ensp;<code>try&nbsp;{}</code>

The `head` helper already appends a space:

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/2b67c30bfece00357d5fc09d99b49f21066f04ba/compiler/rustc_ast_pretty/src/pprust/state.rs#L654-L664

so doing `head` followed by `space` resulted in a double space:

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/2b67c30bfece00357d5fc09d99b49f21066f04ba/compiler/rustc_ast_pretty/src/pprust/state.rs#L2241-L2242
Fix whitespace in pretty printed PatKind::Range

Follow-up to rust-lang#92238 fixing one of the FIXMEs.

```rust
macro_rules! repro {
    ($pat:pat) => {
        stringify!($pat)
    };
}

fn main() {
    println!("{}", repro!(0..=1));
}
```

Before:&ensp;`0 ..=1`
After:&ensp;`0..=1`

The canonical spacing applied by rustfmt has no space after the lower expr. Rustc's parser diagnostics also do not put a space there:

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/df96fb166f59431e3de443835e50d5b8a7a4adb0/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/pat.rs#L754
…toyo

Sync rustc_codegen_gcc

r? `@ghost`

cc `@antoyo`

`@rustbot` label +A-codegen +A-gcc +T-compiler
[rustc_builtin_macros] add indices to format_foreign::printf::Substitution::Escape

Fixes rust-lang#92267.

The problem was that the escape string "%%" does not need to appear at the very beginning of the format string, but
the iterator implementation assumed that it did.

The solution follows the pattern used by `format_foregin::shell::Subtitution::Escape`: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/8ed935e92dfb09ae388344b12284bf5110cf9265/compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/format_foreign.rs#L629
…k-Simulacrum

Make tidy check for magic numbers that spell things

Remove existing problematic cases.

r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jan 1, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 1, 2022

📌 Commit 4bd4e27 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jan 1, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 1, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 4bd4e27 with merge 028c6f1...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 1, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 028c6f1 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 1, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 028c6f1 into rust-lang:master Jan 1, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.59.0 milestone Jan 1, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (028c6f1): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-lmduxwh branch January 2, 2022 22:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.