-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support arbitrary inputs to reusable workflow files #888
Support arbitrary inputs to reusable workflow files #888
Conversation
<%- @configs['with'].each do |k,v| -%> | ||
<%= k %>: <%= v %> | ||
<%- end -%> | ||
<%- end -%> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have tested this locally with
bundle exec msync update -f puppet-example --offline --noop
where I made two local commits to the master branch of puppet-example.
1: added this to .sync.yml
.github/workflows/ci.yml:
rubocop: false
2: updated .sync.yml
.github/workflows/ci.yml:
with:
rubocop: false
Seems to work as expected.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's possible to test this change any more on real modules as the changes to .sync.yml has to be merged to main/master for msync to pick it up.
If I added with
key and merge it, msync will fail on that module until the PR is merged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
remove the --noop --offline
from the msync call and provide a PR for puppet-example? That's how we usually do it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, as expected it doesn't change anything in the local modulesync branch so it's not pushed ...
The puppet-example doesn't even have .github/workflows/ci.yml
in it's sync file.
Do you want me to change puppet-example so that I can generate a diff?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We often (ab)use puppet-example as our testing ground. Feel free to use that. Though with --offline (then --noop is redundant) it should take .sync.yml into account
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I didn't commit my changes to .sync.yml in the local modulsync branch before rerun of msync ...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With --offline it shouldn't care about git and work purely local
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a9de596
to
f6e8bc4
Compare
Rebased to sign my commit |
@bastelfreak @ekohl anything else needed or is this ready to merge now? |
Add possibility to use
with
as a key to.github/workflows/ci.yml
and.github/workflows/release.yml
in.sync.yml
i.e:
or