PyPI Package? #5
Comments
|
Dear @Zeitsperre, Thanks for your contribution, your PR is now merged. I had planned to make SBCK installable by pip and conda once the XSBCK ( |
5 tasks
Zeitsperre
added a commit
to Ouranosinc/xclim
that referenced
this issue
Mar 31, 2023
### What kind of change does this PR introduce? * Grammar and spelling mistakes within the notebooks have been ~corrected~ reduced. * `SBCK` has been pulled from `environment.yml` for the time being until a proper package is created. * The Contributing guide now lists three separate subsections to help users understand the gains from optional dependencies ### Does this PR introduce a breaking change? Yes, but no[^1]. Changes to dependencies have been handled in such a way that default settings are unaffected. Development and CI-based behaviour is affected: `clisops` and `flox` are now in the `environment.yml`. ### Other information: yrobink/SBCK-python#5 [^1]: https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/028/596/dsmGaKWMeHXe9QuJtq_ys30PNfTGnMsRuHuo_MUzGCg.jpg
|
Dear @Zeitsperre , SBCK is now available in pypi: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi @yrobink,
I'm wondering if you would be interested in having SBCK-python as a
pip-installable Python package on PyPI. My PR (#4) fixes most of the issues that would block this package from being contributed, and the remaining work involved is miniscule (creating a user, generating a source package, uploading to PyPI withtwine).If this is of interest to you, I don't mind contributing some time towards this. This would be a welcome addition for
xclim.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: