Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added Linux SiteContainer APIs #27942

Merged

Conversation

DJagwani
Copy link
Contributor

ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request

Tip

Overwhelmed by all this guidance? See the Getting help section at the bottom of this PR description.

Note

As of January 2024 there is no PR assignee. This is expected. See https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review.

PR review workflow diagram

Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.

diagram

Click here to see the details of Step 1

Breaking changes review (Diagram Step 1)

If the automation determines you have breaking changes, i.e. Step 1 from the diagram applies to you,
you must follow the breaking changes process.
IMPORTANT This applies even if:

  • The tool fails while it shouldn't, e.g. due to runtime exception, or incorrect detection of breaking changes.
  • You believe there is no need for you to request breaking change approval, for any reason.
    Such claims must be reviewed, and the process is the same.
Click here to see the details of Step 2

ARM API changes review (Diagram Step 2)

Click here to see the diagram footnotes

Diagram footnotes

[1] See ARM review queue (for PR merge queues, see [2]).
[2] public repo merge queue, private repo merge queue (for ARM review queue, [1])
The ARM reviewer on-call engineer visits the merge queue twice a day, so the approximate ETA for merges is 12 - 24 hours.

Purpose of this PR

What's the purpose of this PR? Check the specific option that applies. This is mandatory!

  • New resource provider.
  • New API version for an existing resource provider. (If API spec is not defined in TypeSpec, the PR should have been generated using OpenAPI Hub).
  • Update existing version for a new feature. (This is applicable only when you are revising a private preview API version.)
  • Update existing version to fix OpenAPI spec quality issues in S360.
  • Other, please clarify:
    • Adding new APIs for Linux SideContainers
    • 8 new APIs [4 each for sites and slots]:
      • ListSiteContainers [GET /sitecontainers]
      • GetSiteConatiener [GET /siteconatiners/{containerName}]
      • CreateOrUpdateSiteConatiener [PUT /siteconatiners/{containerName}]
      • DeleteSiteConatiener [DELETE /siteconatiners/{containerName}]

Due diligence checklist

To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:

  • I confirm this PR is modifying Azure Resource Manager (ARM) related specifications, and not data plane related specifications.
  • I have reviewed following Resource Provider guidelines, including
    ARM resource provider contract and
    REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
    I understand this is required before I can proceed to the diagram Step 2, "ARM API changes review", for this PR.

Additional information

Viewing API changes

For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table
in the Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.

Suppressing failures

If one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR, please follow the
suppressions guide to get approval.

Getting help

  • First, please carefully read through this PR description, from top to bottom. Please fill out the Purpose of this PR and Due diligence checklist.
  • To understand what you must do next to merge this PR, see the Next Steps to Merge comment. It will appear within few minutes of submitting this PR and will continue to be up-to-date with current PR state.
  • For guidance on fixing this PR CI check failures, see the hyperlinks provided in given failure
    and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.
  • For help with PR workflow diagram Step 2 (ARM review), see https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review.
  • If the PR CI checks appear to be stuck in queued state, please add a comment with contents /azp run.
    This should result in a new comment denoting a PR validation pipeline has started and the checks should be updated after few minutes.
  • If the help provided by the previous points is not enough, post to https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel and link to this PR.

@DJagwani DJagwani requested a review from naveedaz as a code owner February 27, 2024 08:32
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Next Steps to Merge

✅ All automated merging requirements have been met! Refer to step 4 in the PR workflow diagram (even if your PR is for data plane, not ARM).

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️❌Breaking Change(Cross-Version): 17 Errors, 12 Warnings failed [Detail]
compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.5)] new version base version
WebApps.json 2023-12-01(71b8aa7) 2023-01-01(main)

The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest stable version:

Rule Message
1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code '202'.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L271:11
1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code '202'.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L1148:11
1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code '202'.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L1937:11
1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code '202'.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L2496:11
1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code '202'.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L2560:11
1023 - TypeFormatChanged The new version has a different format than the previous one.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/CommonDefinitions.json#L973:9
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L29134:13
1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'properties' renamed or removed?
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/CommonDefinitions.json#L972:7
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L29129:7
1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'id' renamed or removed?
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/CommonDefinitions.json#L972:7
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L29129:7
1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'name' renamed or removed?
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/CommonDefinitions.json#L972:7
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L29129:7
1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'kind' renamed or removed?
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/CommonDefinitions.json#L972:7
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L29129:7
1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'type' renamed or removed?
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/CommonDefinitions.json#L972:7
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L29129:7
1044 - XmsLongRunningOperationChanged The new version has a different 'x-ms-longrunning-operation' value than the previous one.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L227:7
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L221:7
1044 - XmsLongRunningOperationChanged The new version has a different 'x-ms-longrunning-operation' value than the previous one.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L298:7
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L282:7
1044 - XmsLongRunningOperationChanged The new version has a different 'x-ms-longrunning-operation' value than the previous one.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L1107:7
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L1090:7
1044 - XmsLongRunningOperationChanged The new version has a different 'x-ms-longrunning-operation' value than the previous one.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L1896:7
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L1869:7
1044 - XmsLongRunningOperationChanged The new version has a different 'x-ms-longrunning-operation' value than the previous one.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L2455:7
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L2418:7
1044 - XmsLongRunningOperationChanged The new version has a different 'x-ms-longrunning-operation' value than the previous one.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L2519:7
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L2472:7
⚠️ 1017 - ReferenceRedirection The '$ref' property points to different models in the old and new versions.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L6390:13
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L6333:13
⚠️ 1017 - ReferenceRedirection The '$ref' property points to different models in the old and new versions.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/CommonDefinitions.json#L964:9
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L29130:9
⚠️ 1017 - ReferenceRedirection The '$ref' property points to different models in the old and new versions.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L6425:13
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L6368:13
⚠️ 1017 - ReferenceRedirection The '$ref' property points to different models in the old and new versions.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L6439:13
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L6382:13
⚠️ 1017 - ReferenceRedirection The '$ref' property points to different models in the old and new versions.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L6515:13
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L6458:13
⚠️ 1017 - ReferenceRedirection The '$ref' property points to different models in the old and new versions.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L6529:13
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L6472:13
⚠️ 1017 - ReferenceRedirection The '$ref' property points to different models in the old and new versions.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L15713:13
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L15454:13
⚠️ 1017 - ReferenceRedirection The '$ref' property points to different models in the old and new versions.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L15748:13
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L15489:13
⚠️ 1017 - ReferenceRedirection The '$ref' property points to different models in the old and new versions.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L15769:13
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L15510:13
⚠️ 1017 - ReferenceRedirection The '$ref' property points to different models in the old and new versions.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L15852:13
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L15593:13
⚠️ 1017 - ReferenceRedirection The '$ref' property points to different models in the old and new versions.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/WebApps.json#L15873:13
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L15614:13
⚠️ 1032 - DifferentAllOf The new version has a different 'allOf' property than the previous one.
New: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-12-01/CommonDefinitions.json#L969:5
Old: Microsoft.Web/stable/2023-01-01/WebApps.json#L29121:5
️🔄LintDiff inProgress [Detail]
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️❌SwaggerAPIView: 0 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️❌ azure-sdk-for-js failed [Detail]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️🔄 azure-resource-manager-schemas inProgress [Detail]
️⚠️ azure-powershell warning [Detail]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Generated ApiView

Language Package Name ApiView Link
Go sdk/resourcemanager/appservice/armappservice Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
Java azure-resourcemanager-appservice-generated Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.

@ms-zhenhua ms-zhenhua added ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Feb 29, 2024
Copy link

Please address or respond to feedback from the ARM API reviewer.
When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove the ARMChangesRequested label.
This will notify the reviewer to have another look.
If the feedback provided needs further discussion, please use this Teams channel to post your questions - aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel.
Please include [ARM Query] in the title of your question to indicate that it is ARM-related.

@DJagwani
Copy link
Contributor Author

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"

@DJagwani
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DJagwani please read the following Contributor License Agreement(CLA). If you agree with the CLA, please reply with the following information.

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree [company="{your company}"]

Options:

  • (default - no company specified) I have sole ownership of intellectual property rights to my Submissions and I am not making Submissions in the course of work for my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree
  • (when company given) I am making Submissions in the course of work for my employer (or my employer has intellectual property rights in my Submissions by contract or applicable law). I have permission from my employer to make Submissions and enter into this Agreement on behalf of my employer. By signing below, the defined term “You” includes me and my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"

Contributor License Agreement

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"

@DJagwani DJagwani closed this Feb 29, 2024
@DJagwani DJagwani reopened this Feb 29, 2024
@DJagwani
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ms-zhenhua
I have resolved your comments on this PR.
But I don't have permission to remove the label ARMChangesRequested from the PR.
Can you please help in removing this label and further reviewing this PR?

@ms-zhenhua ms-zhenhua added WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Mar 1, 2024
@DJagwani DJagwani requested a review from kumaramit-msft March 4, 2024 11:54
cSpell.json Show resolved Hide resolved
@DJagwani
Copy link
Contributor Author

DJagwani commented Mar 5, 2024

/pr RequestMerge

@ms-zhenhua
Copy link
Contributor

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).

@ms-zhenhua ms-zhenhua merged commit 1101020 into Azure:release-web-2023-12-01 Mar 5, 2024
22 of 27 checks passed
catalinaperalta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2024
* Introduce Microsoft.Web API version 2023-12-01 (#27100)

* Add VnetBackupRestoreEnabled property to the latest API Version (#27175)

* changed ApproveRejectSitePrivateEndpointConnection request body to match service parameter (#27317)

Co-authored-by: Xingyang Li <xingyangli@microsoft.com>

* e2e encryption (#27226)

Co-authored-by: Chris Rosenblatt <crosenblatt@microsoft.com>

* Adding Vnet-related APIs to Swagger (#27251)

* Add function app config to latest Web API (#27358)

* Add functionAppConfig definition

* Add create or update function app Flex Consumption example

* Add create or update function app Flex Consumption with details example

* Update CommonDefinitions.json to reference the new examples

* Make PUT/PATCH api async for function on aca (#27612)

* Make PUT/PATCH api async for function on aca

* Remove response body

* update examples

* Add headers

---------

Co-authored-by: Vishal Gupta <vishgupta@microsoft.com>

* Add FlexConsumption to the list of supported skus (#27951)

* Add TLS1.3 to valid TLS Versions (#27885)

Authored-by: Chris Rosenblatt <crosenblatt@microsoft.com>. I'm completing this since it was asked for and Chris is OOF atm

* Added Linux SiteContainer APIs (#27942)

* Added Linux SiteContainer APIs

* Resolved validation failures.

* Added SiteContainer and SiteContainerCollection

* Fixed LintDiff errors

* Fixed spellings

* Updated params order.

* Resolving comments.

* Resolving comments.

* Added volumeMounts and envVariables.

* Resolving comments

* Resolving comments

* Removed type and metadata.

* Haochidu/release web 2023 12 01/aseregion hotfix (#28018)

* Update ResourceProvider.json

hot fix

API will return with the correct body but also with a nextLink with a URL instead of just null. I did a little more research and it seems like since my API does not return next links I think the fix should just be set the nextlinkname to null in the swagger specification.

* Update ResourceProvider.json

* Revert "Adding Vnet-related APIs to Swagger (#27251)" (#28249)

This reverts commit 0765e9d.

* Add DnsConfiguration site property to Microsoft.Web API Specs (#27378)

* Add DnsConfiguration property to WebApps.json

* Add SiteDnsConfig to CommonDefinitions.json

* Updated dnslegacy property description

* Update CommonDefinitions.json

* Undo previous update to CommonDefinitions.json

* Update CommonDefinitions.json: added readonly: true for dnsLegacySortOrder

* Add AzureStorageProtocol field to AzureStorageInfoValue definition. (#28289)

Co-authored-by: Amber Renton <amberrenton@microsoft.com>

* Update create function app examples for Flex Consumption (#28566)

* Revert "Make PUT/PATCH api async for function on aca (#27612)" (#28568)

This reverts commit cd214ae.

* Revert "Haochidu/release web 2023 12 01/aseregion hotfix (#28018)" (#28738)

This reverts commit ec1d84f.

* create sdk-suppression.yaml (#28751)

* create sdk-suppression.yaml

* add azure-sdk-for-go suppression

---------

Co-authored-by: Alancere <804873052@qq.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar Karasala <106590066+vkarasala@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xingyangli1278 <xingyangli1278@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Xingyang Li <xingyangli@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Rosenblatt <rosench13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Rosenblatt <crosenblatt@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: hdmimsft <137456285+hdmimsft@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Gamino <Francisco-Gamino@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vishal Gupta <vishalgupta7991@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vishal Gupta <vishgupta@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: DJagwani <122347490+DJagwani@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Haochi <136372741+ha0ch1@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: tbhartia <149726222+tbhartia@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amber Renton <136374263+amberrenton@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amber Renton <amberrenton@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: jocawtho <jocawtho@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: ZiWei Chen <98569699+kazrael2119@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alancere <804873052@qq.com>
rkmanda pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2024
* Introduce Microsoft.Web API version 2023-12-01 (#27100)

* Add VnetBackupRestoreEnabled property to the latest API Version (#27175)

* changed ApproveRejectSitePrivateEndpointConnection request body to match service parameter (#27317)

Co-authored-by: Xingyang Li <xingyangli@microsoft.com>

* e2e encryption (#27226)

Co-authored-by: Chris Rosenblatt <crosenblatt@microsoft.com>

* Adding Vnet-related APIs to Swagger (#27251)

* Add function app config to latest Web API (#27358)

* Add functionAppConfig definition

* Add create or update function app Flex Consumption example

* Add create or update function app Flex Consumption with details example

* Update CommonDefinitions.json to reference the new examples

* Make PUT/PATCH api async for function on aca (#27612)

* Make PUT/PATCH api async for function on aca

* Remove response body

* update examples

* Add headers

---------

Co-authored-by: Vishal Gupta <vishgupta@microsoft.com>

* Add FlexConsumption to the list of supported skus (#27951)

* Add TLS1.3 to valid TLS Versions (#27885)

Authored-by: Chris Rosenblatt <crosenblatt@microsoft.com>. I'm completing this since it was asked for and Chris is OOF atm

* Added Linux SiteContainer APIs (#27942)

* Added Linux SiteContainer APIs

* Resolved validation failures.

* Added SiteContainer and SiteContainerCollection

* Fixed LintDiff errors

* Fixed spellings

* Updated params order.

* Resolving comments.

* Resolving comments.

* Added volumeMounts and envVariables.

* Resolving comments

* Resolving comments

* Removed type and metadata.

* Haochidu/release web 2023 12 01/aseregion hotfix (#28018)

* Update ResourceProvider.json

hot fix

API will return with the correct body but also with a nextLink with a URL instead of just null. I did a little more research and it seems like since my API does not return next links I think the fix should just be set the nextlinkname to null in the swagger specification.

* Update ResourceProvider.json

* Revert "Adding Vnet-related APIs to Swagger (#27251)" (#28249)

This reverts commit 0765e9d.

* Add DnsConfiguration site property to Microsoft.Web API Specs (#27378)

* Add DnsConfiguration property to WebApps.json

* Add SiteDnsConfig to CommonDefinitions.json

* Updated dnslegacy property description

* Update CommonDefinitions.json

* Undo previous update to CommonDefinitions.json

* Update CommonDefinitions.json: added readonly: true for dnsLegacySortOrder

* Add AzureStorageProtocol field to AzureStorageInfoValue definition. (#28289)

Co-authored-by: Amber Renton <amberrenton@microsoft.com>

* Update create function app examples for Flex Consumption (#28566)

* Revert "Make PUT/PATCH api async for function on aca (#27612)" (#28568)

This reverts commit cd214ae.

* Revert "Haochidu/release web 2023 12 01/aseregion hotfix (#28018)" (#28738)

This reverts commit ec1d84f.

* create sdk-suppression.yaml (#28751)

* create sdk-suppression.yaml

* add azure-sdk-for-go suppression

---------

Co-authored-by: Alancere <804873052@qq.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Ashok Kumar Karasala <106590066+vkarasala@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xingyangli1278 <xingyangli1278@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Xingyang Li <xingyangli@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Rosenblatt <rosench13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Rosenblatt <crosenblatt@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: hdmimsft <137456285+hdmimsft@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Francisco Gamino <Francisco-Gamino@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vishal Gupta <vishalgupta7991@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vishal Gupta <vishgupta@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: DJagwani <122347490+DJagwani@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Haochi <136372741+ha0ch1@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: tbhartia <149726222+tbhartia@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amber Renton <136374263+amberrenton@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Amber Renton <amberrenton@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: jocawtho <jocawtho@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: ZiWei Chen <98569699+kazrael2119@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alancere <804873052@qq.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review customer-reported Issues that are reported by GitHub users external to the Azure organization. resource-manager
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants