-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
package update, add missing dependency chardet #75
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
If these changes were merged, would it not cause a |
- python: '3.9' | ||
script: python3 -m tox -e py39 -- --cov-report=xml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice 👍
Pipfile
Outdated
six = "~=1.12" | ||
typing = {markers = "python_version<'3.7'", version = "~=3.7"} | ||
pipfile = "*" | ||
black = {markers = "python_version>='3.6'",version = "==21.9b0"} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not leave black
unpinned here?
black = {markers = "python_version>='3.6'",version = "==21.9b0"} | |
black = {markers = "python_version>='3.6'", version="*"} |
Pinning It in the dev
extras makes more sense to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One thing I've noticed with black, with is quite frustrating, is that it cannot be unpinned without causing other problems. Pipenv will refuse to install it as a "pre-release" without adding the additional flag. This long traceback can be a bit off-putting for some users. Though easily resolved it could also break any scripts that use Pipenv and do not include this flag.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup I was able to confirm.
Additional information:
- issue new 'pre' syntax in Pipfile pypa/pipenv#1760 has been open for a few years now
- PR PEEP-007: Accepting pre-releases for specific packages pypa/pipenv#4607 was opened early this year, but I'm unsure of its status
I'm interested if it's feasible to remove black
as a minimal dependency. It seems like we could provide it as an extra
in one way or another
Pipfile
Outdated
colorama = "*" | ||
packaging = "*" | ||
requirementslib = "*" | ||
vistir = "*" | ||
autopep8 = "*" | ||
six = "*" | ||
typing = "*" | ||
chardet = "*" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Where you able to check if any of these packages may have been pinned for a reason?
still needs rules to run on scheduled/manual triggers Signed-off-by: Bryant Finney <finneybp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryant Finney <finneybp@gmail.com>
oops, #75 in the commit messages is actually referring to #75 in my GitLab fork haha |
currently only installs `pyenv` and Python versions Signed-off-by: Bryant Finney <finneybp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryant Finney <finneybp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryant Finney <finneybp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryant Finney <finneybp@gmail.com>
# Conflicts: # Pipfile # Pipfile.lock # setup.py
The master branch now adds py |
I just checked and do find |
@Madoshakalaka I definitely version .idea, and keep this in
This explains more, from Jetbrains: Not sure about the |
@jshwi thanks, that makes sense. I learned more about .idea files despite being a 5 year intellij user :) |
@Madoshakalaka Oh I had another read, here's what they say about dictionaries:
Funny, sometimes the file gets created for me, sometimes it doesn't |
No description provided.