Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MIG] stock_picking_import_serial_number: Migration to 14.0 #1063

Merged

Conversation

ryanc-me
Copy link
Contributor

@ryanc-me ryanc-me commented Aug 9, 2022

No changes in logic. The only addition is ir.model.access.csv, which is now required for transient models.

@sebalix sebalix added this to the 14.0 milestone Sep 1, 2022
@sebalix
Copy link
Contributor

sebalix commented Sep 1, 2022

/ocabot migration stock_picking_import_serial_number

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2022
57 tasks
@sebalix sebalix marked this pull request as ready for review September 1, 2022 13:01
@rousseldenis
Copy link
Contributor

@ryanc-me

@ryanc-me ryanc-me force-pushed the 14.0-mig-stock_picking_import_serial_number branch 2 times, most recently from 4a80f4e to 8850d27 Compare September 11, 2022 06:57
@ryanc-me
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sebalix Ready to go 👍

sergio-teruel and others added 7 commits October 28, 2022 23:59
[UPD] Update stock_picking_import_serial_number.pot
You can't use a static assignation in kw args, and less the empty
string, which is assigned as is on the char fields (and being different
from NULL values).
Don't pass `default_code` in vals if no reference is provided, for
letting other modules to work properly in integration tests like
`product_code_mandatory` + `product_sequence`.
@ryanc-me ryanc-me force-pushed the 14.0-mig-stock_picking_import_serial_number branch from 8850d27 to 41649bc Compare October 29, 2022 00:01
@ryanc-me
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sebalix @rousseldenis could you guys please re-review?

This is a 14.0 migration of the current 13.0 version.

Note that there is a known edge-case bug in that version, with an in-progress PR #1065.

@pedrobaeza is it okay to migrate as-is like this? Once #1065 is merged I can create a PR to forward-port it (unless that's handled by OCA in the background).

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

Yes, it's reasonable.

@sebalix
Copy link
Contributor

sebalix commented Nov 7, 2022

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it!
Prepared branch 14.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1063-by-sebalix-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 569f370 into OCA:14.0 Nov 7, 2022
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 88b9eac. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants