-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
replace function type with function isinstance #15209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
|
I think we need a JIRA because BTW, it seems you intend to support sub-classes via If so, there are some instances similar with this. Maybe we should check those as well. |
| """ | ||
| if isinstance(v, Vector): | ||
| return len(v) | ||
| elif type(v) in (array.array, list, tuple, xrange): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this change is legitimate, we should change this to isinstance(v, (array.array, list, tuple, xrange))
|
Thanks for looking to get involved @frankfqchen :) I think this PR definitely needs a JIRA and maybe some more description about what the intent of the change is rather than just the contents of the change. The Spark Contributing guide can help you out - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark |
|
@frankfqchen Could you follow the comment above? If you are not able to proceed further, I think it might be better closed for now. Actually, IMHO, I am not too sure if it is worth sweeping them. |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR proposes to close stale PRs. What I mean by "stale" here includes that there are some review comments by reviewers but the author looks inactive without any answer to them more than a month. I left some comments roughly a week ago to ping and the author looks still inactive in these PR below These below includes some PR suggested to be closed and a PR against another branch which seems obviously inappropriate. Given the comments in the last three PRs below, they are probably worth being taken over by anyone who is interested in it. Closes apache#7963 Closes apache#8374 Closes apache#11192 Closes apache#11374 Closes apache#11692 Closes apache#12243 Closes apache#12583 Closes apache#12620 Closes apache#12675 Closes apache#12697 Closes apache#12800 Closes apache#13715 Closes apache#14266 Closes apache#15053 Closes apache#15159 Closes apache#15209 Closes apache#15264 Closes apache#15267 Closes apache#15871 Closes apache#15861 Closes apache#16319 Closes apache#16324 Closes apache#16890 Closes apache#12398 Closes apache#12933 Closes apache#14517 ## How was this patch tested? N/A Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com> Closes apache#16937 from HyukjinKwon/stale-prs-close.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
replace function type with function isinstance
How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)