Skip to content

Conversation

@frankfqchen
Copy link

@frankfqchen frankfqchen commented Sep 23, 2016

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

replace function type with function isinstance

How was this patch tested?

(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)

(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

I think we need a JIRA because type and isinstance are not exactly same. Also, maybe it'd better if the PR descriptions explains the bug and how this PR tries to resolve it.

BTW, it seems you intend to support sub-classes via isinstance consistently across the API, right?

If so, there are some instances similar with this. Maybe we should check those as well.

$ grep -r "type(.*) [=|\!]" . | grep .python | grep -v "tests.py"

./python/pyspark/ml/linalg/__init__.py:    elif type(v) == np.ndarray:
./python/pyspark/ml/linalg/__init__.py:        if type(other) == np.ndarray:
./python/pyspark/ml/linalg/__init__.py:            if type(pairs) == dict:
./python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py:        if type(value) == list:
./python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py:        elif type(value) == np.unicode_:
./python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py:        if type(value) == bool:
./python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py:    elif type(v) == np.ndarray:
./python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py:        if type(other) == np.ndarray:
./python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py:            if type(pairs) == dict:
./python/pyspark/mllib/stat/_statistics.py:        if type(y) == str:
./python/pyspark/sql/column.py:        if type(startPos) != type(length):
./python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py:            if type(path) != list:
./python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py:        if type(path) == list:
./python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py:        if type(interval) != str or len(interval.strip()) == 0:
./python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py:            if type(path) != str or len(path.strip()) == 0:
./python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py:        if not outputMode or type(outputMode) != str or len(outputMode.strip()) == 0:
./python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py:        if not queryName or type(queryName) != str or len(queryName.strip()) == 0:
./python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py:            if type(processingTime) != str or len(processingTime.strip()) == 0:
./python/pyspark/sql/types.py:        return type(self) == type(other)

"""
if isinstance(v, Vector):
return len(v)
elif type(v) in (array.array, list, tuple, xrange):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this change is legitimate, we should change this to isinstance(v, (array.array, list, tuple, xrange))

@holdenk
Copy link
Contributor

holdenk commented Oct 7, 2016

Thanks for looking to get involved @frankfqchen :)

I think this PR definitely needs a JIRA and maybe some more description about what the intent of the change is rather than just the contents of the change. The Spark Contributing guide can help you out - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

HyukjinKwon commented Feb 9, 2017

@frankfqchen Could you follow the comment above? If you are not able to proceed further, I think it might be better closed for now. Actually, IMHO, I am not too sure if it is worth sweeping them.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in ed338f7 Feb 17, 2017
zifeif2 pushed a commit to zifeif2/spark that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2025
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to close stale PRs.

What I mean by "stale" here includes that there are some review comments by reviewers but the author looks inactive without any answer to them more than a month.

I left some comments roughly a week ago to ping and the author looks still inactive in these PR below

These below includes some PR suggested to be closed and a PR against another branch which seems obviously inappropriate.

Given the comments in the last three PRs below, they are probably worth being taken over by anyone who is interested in it.

Closes apache#7963
Closes apache#8374
Closes apache#11192
Closes apache#11374
Closes apache#11692
Closes apache#12243
Closes apache#12583
Closes apache#12620
Closes apache#12675
Closes apache#12697
Closes apache#12800
Closes apache#13715
Closes apache#14266
Closes apache#15053
Closes apache#15159
Closes apache#15209
Closes apache#15264
Closes apache#15267
Closes apache#15871
Closes apache#15861
Closes apache#16319
Closes apache#16324
Closes apache#16890

Closes apache#12398
Closes apache#12933
Closes apache#14517

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>

Closes apache#16937 from HyukjinKwon/stale-prs-close.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants