-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 308
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release ADAM version 0.20.0 #1048
Comments
Moving conversation with @heuermh from #1192 over to this ticket:
As I commented over there, I'd need a release with the pipes API (#1114) before December. Is the main goal of pulling the release in to 10/10 to get @ryan-williams off of his #1139 fork? I'm OK with that, but we should really plan to cut a follow-on release (0.20.1?) sooner, because I need #1114, and getting #1114 merged has really dragged out. As of next Wednesday, #1114 will have been open for two months... My primary concern is probably less about the specific release dates, and more about the fact that they keep on slipping. I'm reasonably OK with putting an arbitrary line in the sand and cutting a release followed up with another release shortly thereafter, but there's a lot of issues here that have dragged out without resolution or action. Specifically, the VCF issues and documentation issues need to close before we can push out the ADAM paper. They're not really negotiable; they need to be done by November. I own two of the documentation issues, and I'll close on them ASAP (#1084, #1085). @heuermh can you commit to a timeline for closing the VCF issues? If not—I hate to say this—but I will take them on and close them. @jpdna can you commit to a timeline for #493? Of the other open issues, I am OK with triaging #1092 to the "indefinite" pile. |
#1114 is nearly ready to go as I see it. I'll work up another external tool example over the weekend to test. Is it ok to block the 0.20.0 release on it being merged? Would then a Dec 10th target for 0.21 (including #1144 and the follow-on GenotypeAnnotation refactor) be reasonable, with another round of triage to focus on what is necessary for the paper? #1092 is fairly significant, is it not? No code using the Java APIs will compile without using the non-obvious cast as a workaround. |
From today's discussion: New release date for 0.20 of Friday, 14 October 2016 (@heuermh will cut the release) |
I've created a new 0.22 milestone for 15 Dec, moved 0.21 to 15 Nov, and moved 1.0 to 15 Feb. I then triaged the doc and variant annotation stuff to 0.21 and everything else to 0.22. Let me know what you think. |
Was 0.20.0 released? I don't see it here. |
I'm still waiting to hear from Sonatype to help determine the least painful option. Meanwhile I'll have some pull requests that should fix things for the next release. |
Makes sense; should we re-open this? |
I don't think so, the release has been cut and tagged. The hangup with Sonatype Nexus is something else |
Issue triage for ADAM version 0.20.0 release
Mango needs changes to formats, utils, and adam in order to land their changes from feature branches into master.
Major refactoring around GenomicRDD and related
Updates to Hadoop-BAM to add gzipped/BGZF VCF support, among other things
Improved feature support, including GFF3
BAM header bugs
Support CRAM input/output
Improved VCF support, for Mayo VariantDB Challenge
Support Sample schema
Support Spark version 2.0
Pipes API
Region joins
Documentation, code cleanup
-single
without merging them #1161org.bdgenomics.adam.algorithms.smithwaterman
package. #1056org.bdgenomics.adam.io
package. #1064Bugs
Packaging cleanup
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: