Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert back to medium VM for Linux aarch64. #51241

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

martin-g
Copy link
Contributor

@martin-g martin-g commented Oct 8, 2024

Needed large for #51214

Describe your pull request here


Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).

General instructions

  • If this PR adds or updates a recipe, use "Add" or "Update" appropriately as the first word in its title.
  • New recipes not directly relevant to the biological sciences need to be submitted to the conda-forge channel instead of Bioconda.
  • PRs require reviews prior to being merged. Once your PR is passing tests and ready to be merged, please issue the @BiocondaBot please add label command.
  • Please post questions on Gitter or ping @bioconda/core in a comment.

Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues

Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify run_exports (see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).
Add a run_exports section like this:

build:
  run_exports:
    - ...

with ... being one of:

Case run_exports statement
semantic versioning {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}
semantic versioning (0.x.x) {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}
known breakage in minor versions {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }} (in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that)
known breakage in patch versions {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }} (in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that)
calendar versioning {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}

while replacing "myrecipe" with either name if a name|lower variable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.

Bot commands for PR management

Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:

Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:

@BiocondaBot please update Merge the master branch into a PR.
@BiocondaBot please add label Add the please review & merge label.
@BiocondaBot please fetch artifacts Post links to CI-built packages/containers.
You can use this to test packages locally.

Note that the @BiocondaBot please merge command is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.

Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include @bioconda/<team> and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed <team>.

Needed `large` for bioconda#51214

Signed-off-by: Martin Tzvetanov Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org>
@martin-g martin-g added the aarch64 Related to adding linux-aarch64 support label Oct 8, 2024
@martin-g martin-g requested a review from mencian October 8, 2024 10:56
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 8, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the CircleCI configuration file .circleci/config.yml, with a focus on executor definitions and job configurations. The linux-aarch64 executor's resource class is changed from arm.large to arm.medium. In the build_and_test job, the command for checking additional platforms is updated to use the origin/master...HEAD range. The build_and_upload job's command has been altered to use the ${CIRCLE_SHA1}~1 ${CIRCLE_SHA1} range and now employs bioconda-utils handle-merged-pr for building and pushing instead of the previous command. A new command is added to the bulk_build job to check for the presence of the [ci run] marker in the commit message, which dictates whether the job will continue. The nightly_build job has also been updated to build and push leftover packages, maintaining the same docker options as in previous jobs. Additionally, the workflows section has been adjusted to accommodate ARM architecture jobs, incorporating specific filters for branches and matrix parameters for the operating systems utilized.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • bgruening: Suggested as a reviewer for this pull request.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.circleci/config.yml (1)

Line range hint 180-189: Approved: Added check for [ci run] marker in bulk_build job

The addition of a check for the "[ci run]" marker in the commit message is a good improvement. This allows for more granular control over when the bulk build job runs, potentially saving resources by preventing unnecessary builds.

Consider updating the project documentation to explain:

  1. When and how to use the "[ci run]" marker in commit messages.
  2. The implications of including or omitting this marker for the bulk build process.

This will ensure that all contributors are aware of this new feature and can use it effectively.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a60c239 and 57ed9c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .circleci/config.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.circleci/config.yml (4)

Line range hint 24-30: Approved: Updated git range for checking additional platforms

The change to use "origin/master...HEAD" as the git range for checking additional platforms is an improvement. This range ensures that all changes from the master branch up to the current commit are considered, potentially catching more relevant changes that require building and testing.


Line range hint 117-123: Approved: Updated git range and build command for merged PRs

The changes in the build_and_upload job are appropriate:

  1. The git range "${CIRCLE_SHA1}~1 ${CIRCLE_SHA1}" focuses on the specific commit being built, which is suitable for this job.
  2. The use of "bioconda-utils handle-merged-pr" instead of "bioconda-utils build" suggests a more specialized handling of merged pull requests.

Could you provide more information about the "handle-merged-pr" command? Specifically:

  1. What additional steps does it perform compared to the regular "build" command?
  2. Are there any new dependencies or configuration changes required for this command?

To verify the behavior of the new command, you could run:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the help output of the handle-merged-pr command
bioconda-utils handle-merged-pr --help

# Compare the output of the old and new commands
bioconda-utils build --help
bioconda-utils handle-merged-pr --help | diff - <(bioconda-utils build --help)

Also applies to: 160-163


12-12: Approved: Revert to medium VM for Linux aarch64

This change aligns with the PR objective of reverting back to a medium VM for Linux aarch64.

To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact build times, please monitor the performance of Linux aarch64 builds after this change is implemented. Consider running the following command to compare build times before and after the change:


Line range hint 240-246: Approved: Added build and push for leftover packages in nightly_build job

The addition of a command to build and push leftover packages in the nightly_build job is a good improvement. This ensures that any packages not built during regular jobs are handled, improving the overall reliability of the build process.

To ensure this addition doesn't significantly impact the duration of nightly builds, please monitor the nightly build times after this change is implemented. You can use the following command to track nightly build durations:

If you notice a significant increase in build times, consider optimizing the process or adjusting the scheduling of the nightly builds.

@mencian mencian merged commit 2571589 into bioconda:master Oct 8, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
aarch64 Related to adding linux-aarch64 support
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants