Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Isolation Test Failure in isolation_multiuser_locking in PG17 #7714

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 23, 2024

Conversation

m3hm3t
Copy link
Contributor

@m3hm3t m3hm3t commented Oct 22, 2024

This PR enhances isolation_multiuser_locking.spec test compatibility across multiple PostgreSQL versions by handling differences in error messages and behavior. Key updates include:

  • Error Message Handling: Adjustments to manage version-specific error messages, ensuring consistent test results.

  • Modified to address variations in locking behavior across PostgreSQL versions, ensuring test stability in multiuser scenarios.

  • REINDEX Behavior Adjustment: This PR accounts for a behavioral change introduced in PostgreSQL by commit ecb0fd337, which alters how REINDEX interacts with system catalogs.

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=ecb0fd337

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (release-13.0@f123632). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             release-13.0    #7714   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   89.60%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?      274           
  Lines                   ?    59730           
  Branches                ?     7451           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?    53520           
  Misses                  ?     4076           
  Partials                ?     2134           

@m3hm3t m3hm3t marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2024 10:42
@m3hm3t m3hm3t self-assigned this Oct 22, 2024

step s1-insert:
UPDATE test_table SET column2 = 1;
<waiting ...>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this seems a bit suspicious as we were throwing a permission-check error in the older test output

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suppose that because of this commit:

git.postgresql.org Git - postgresql.git/commitdiff

If you think that it is unrelated, ı Will looked into that more.

@m3hm3t m3hm3t requested a review from onurctirtir November 8, 2024 14:30
@naisila naisila force-pushed the naisila/pg17_support branch from 70cf729 to e4040dd Compare November 10, 2024 20:03
@naisila naisila force-pushed the naisila/pg17_support branch from 04a8f6a to b29c332 Compare November 11, 2024 09:03
@m3hm3t m3hm3t force-pushed the m3hm3t/pg17_isolation_multiuser_lock branch from 1fbdd9f to 94bbb2e Compare November 11, 2024 10:32
@m3hm3t m3hm3t marked this pull request as draft November 11, 2024 13:13
@m3hm3t m3hm3t marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2024 19:49
@naisila naisila force-pushed the naisila/pg17_support branch 3 times, most recently from e12686a to 46dc966 Compare November 19, 2024 09:27
@m3hm3t m3hm3t marked this pull request as draft November 20, 2024 11:26
@naisila naisila force-pushed the naisila/pg17_support branch 7 times, most recently from e108bb8 to c396ce6 Compare November 22, 2024 13:27
@naisila naisila force-pushed the naisila/pg17_support branch from c396ce6 to a12026b Compare December 2, 2024 14:32
@naisila naisila force-pushed the naisila/pg17_support branch 6 times, most recently from 1e55f40 to 1c39f95 Compare December 8, 2024 08:33
@naisila naisila force-pushed the naisila/pg17_support branch 2 times, most recently from e8352a8 to 5ce353b Compare December 18, 2024 13:19
@naisila naisila force-pushed the naisila/pg17_support branch 2 times, most recently from 7cee81c to ab8221a Compare December 19, 2024 18:42
@m3hm3t m3hm3t changed the base branch from naisila/pg17_support to m3hm3t/pg17_support December 19, 2024 19:04
@m3hm3t m3hm3t requested a review from naisila December 23, 2024 09:08
@naisila naisila marked this pull request as ready for review December 23, 2024 09:31
Copy link
Member

@naisila naisila left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, thanks!

Reminder to rebase to release-13.0 and only merge the changes related to these three files (isolation....spec, isolation...out, isolation..._0.out).

@naisila naisila force-pushed the m3hm3t/pg17_isolation_multiuser_lock branch from ee04da6 to 332828e Compare December 23, 2024 10:10
@naisila naisila changed the base branch from m3hm3t/pg17_support to release-13.0 December 23, 2024 10:11
@naisila naisila merged commit 2d843cb into release-13.0 Dec 23, 2024
143 of 156 checks passed
@naisila naisila deleted the m3hm3t/pg17_isolation_multiuser_lock branch December 23, 2024 10:30
naisila added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2024
This is the final commit that adds
PG17 compatibility with Citus's current capabilities.

You can use Citus community, release-13.0 branch, with PG17.1.

---------

Specifically, this commit:

- Enables PG17 in the configure script.

- Adds PG17 tests to CI using test images that have 17.1

- Fixes an upgrade test: see below for details
In `citus_prepare_upgrade()`, don't drop any_value when upgrading from
PG16+, because PG16+ has its own any_value function. Attempting to do so
results in the error seen in [pg16-pg17
upgrade](https://github.com/citusdata/citus/actions/runs/11768444117/job/32778340003?pr=7661):
```
ERROR:  cannot drop function any_value(anyelement) because it is required by the database system
CONTEXT:  SQL statement "DROP AGGREGATE IF EXISTS pg_catalog.any_value(anyelement)"
```
When 16 becomes the minimum supported Postgres version, the drop
statements can be removed.

---------

Several PG17 Compatibility commits have been merged before this final one.
All these subtasks are done #7653

See the list below:

Compilation PR: #7699
Ruleutils PR: #7725
Sister PR for tests: citusdata/the-process#159

Helpful smaller PRs:
- #7714
- #7726
- #7731
- #7732
- #7733
- #7738
- #7745
- #7747
- #7748
- #7749
- #7752
- #7755
- #7757
- #7759
- #7760
- #7761
- #7762
- #7765
- #7766
- #7768
- #7769
- #7771
- #7774
- #7776
- #7780
- #7781
- #7785
- #7788
- #7793
- #7796

---------

Co-authored-by: Colm <colmmchugh@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants