-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/base sampling #125
Conversation
Can you merge new master? Then ill have a look ;-) |
Done @michaelpantic |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, see nitpicks about comments
Hmm, that's a bit ugly but if its documented nicely somewhere that should be fine. It has the advantage that the sampler node also could be something external if needed. BTW, how do you decide if sampling should be run at all? |
First of all every receiver type can sample its static position using the service call |
Thanks for the review. I documented the code behavior and improved the sampling interface. |
Awesome, very nice functionality.. thanks for the clarification! |
This PR introduces (automatic) base station sampling using a least square estimate.
To be reviewed after #124. Adresses base sampling capabilities mentioned in #102.
This code may have a "code smell" as the base station receiver is subscribing to its own ROS topic to indicate when the sampling has finished.