Skip to content

Conversation

GarveyJoe
Copy link
Contributor

…o property_list and accessor

@bader bader added the spec extension All issues/PRs related to extensions specifications label Jun 19, 2020
@bader
Copy link
Contributor

bader commented Jun 22, 2020

@GarveyJoe, I'd like to use following commit title:
"[SYCL][Doc] Add SYCL_INTEL_accessor_properties extension specification (#1925)"

And move current PR title to the commit message body:
"Added an extension that introduces compile-time-constant properties to property_list and accessor"

Are you okay with it?

@MrSidims
Copy link
Contributor

AFAIK Joe is on vacation. Readdressing the question to @mohammadfawaz

@mohammadfawaz
Copy link
Contributor

@GarveyJoe, I'd like to use following commit title:
"[SYCL][Doc] Add SYCL_INTEL_accessor_properties extension specification (#1925)"

And move current PR title to the commit message body:
"Added an extension that introduces compile-time-constant properties to property_list and accessor"

Are you okay with it?

On behalf of Joe. I believe this is reasonable. Thanks!

@bader bader merged commit 58fc414 into sycl Jun 23, 2020
@bader bader deleted the GarveyJoe-patch-2 branch June 23, 2020 17:05
@bader
Copy link
Contributor

bader commented Jun 23, 2020

@mohammadfawaz, thanks.

alexbatashev pushed a commit to alexbatashev/llvm that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2020
* upstream/sycl:
  [SYCL] Implement braced-init-list or a number as range for queue::parallel_for (intel#1931)
  [SYCL][Doc] Add SYCL_INTEL_accessor_properties extension specification (intel#1925)
  [SYCL-PTX] Add builtins for the relational category (intel#1831)
  [SYCL][CUDA] Remove unnecessary memfence (intel#1935)
  [SYCL] Add handling for wrapped sampler (intel#1942)
  [SYCL] Release notes for June'20 DPCPP implementation update (intel#1948)
  [SYCL] Fix assert when calling get_binaries() on host (intel#1944)
  [SYCL] Fix check for reqd_sub_group_size attribute mismatches (intel#1905)
Copy link
Contributor

@keryell keryell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That sounds like a good progress towards some ideas of P0367R0.
I hope to see some FPGA-related properties too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec extension All issues/PRs related to extensions specifications
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants