-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Default values of Client
/connect()
are not documented
#150
Comments
Thanks for your feedback! I've finally received some feedback on the discussion regarding the files-APIs in #146, so there will finally be progress now on the Two comments on your post however:
|
Okey! I will wait and follow the #149 and after completion then revisit. Thanks for the reply! |
As mentioned in #150 this won't be “fixed” by allowing |
Client
/connect()
are not documented
* Better signature for the `connect` function (fixes ipfs-shipyard#150) * Document the `stream` parameter * Return values are now *documented*, not *commented* on (syntactial change) * Document the JSON object keys of several methods separately
* Better signature for the `connect` function (fixes ipfs-shipyard#150) * Document the `stream` parameter * Return values are now *documented*, not *commented* on (syntactial change) * Document the JSON object keys of several methods separately
* Better signature for the `connect` function (fixes #150) * Document the `stream` parameter * Return values are now *documented*, not *commented* on (syntactial change) * Document the JSON object keys of several methods separately
The #7 was reintroduced I guess by some refactoring. Passing None to
Client
/connect()
will result in no default values used and a not much informative exception:I am happy to provide refix, I am only not sure how to proceed because of the on-going renaming (#148). Should I wait until merged, target some specific branch or something else? Please let me know.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: