-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#1313 Location preferences #777
Conversation
Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit 0c123ab): https://jac-apply-develop--pr777-1313-location-prefs-q6d921qe.web.app (expires Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:50:05 GMT) 🔥 via Firebase Hosting GitHub Action 🌎 |
b25012d
to
f1306db
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ignore my earlier comment re: can't see the numbers, I've selected multiple choice on Admin (sorry!).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kate this looks perfect it can be sent out to UTG. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Fab, well done!
* wip * wip * ranked choice changes * remove unrelated changes * remove padding * remove phantom checkbox * add to review page * remove from review page [wrong branch] Co-authored-by: warrensearle <warren.searle@judicialappointments.digital>
* 517 Collect more detailed history of qualifying test responses - Save history - on Exit Modal - on information page - on review - on Situational Judgement - Save session - on skip - on SAve * Disable circleci config * Include CODEOWNERS * digital-platform#305 Include pull request template * Include lint and test in PR workflow * Fix the broken preview URLs and workflow (#752) * Small change to test broken * Preview workflow should use node 10, for now * Update package-lock * Small change to test fixed * test to fix Co-authored-by: Tom Russell <TR115251@hotmail.co.uk> * #729 Fixed errors on Qualifications page (#734) * #729 Fixed errors on Qualifications page * #729 Changes as per PR comments Co-authored-by: Maria Brookes <maria_brookes@yahoo.co.uk> Co-authored-by: warrensearle <warren.searle@judicialappointments.digital> * #708 account creation issues (#751) * Add await into account creation - improve password validation * sort sign-in chronology * add and fix password tests * Add await into account creation - improve password validation * sort sign-in chronology * add and fix password tests * fix signUp test Co-authored-by: warrensearle <warren.searle@judicialappointments.digital> * #720 Added a message if vacancy was unpublished (#732) * #720 Added a message if vacancy was unpublished * #720 Display message if vacancy unpublished * Made changes to make applications appear * Made changes to make applications appear * Made changes to make applications appear * WIP * #720 Made changes to accommodate unpublished vacancy Co-authored-by: Maria Brookes <maria_brookes@yahoo.co.uk> Co-authored-by: warrensearle <warren.searle@judicialappointments.digital> * Update github workflow files * Bump version number to 1.39.0 * Remove circleCI config * Update README.md * Bump version number to 1.40.0 * Update workflows to target staging and production * Bump version number to 1.39.0 * Remove name-blind sift and phone assessment from timeline (#753) * remove name-blind sift and phone assessment from timeline * fix timeline tests * delete commented code Co-authored-by: HalcyonJAC <79906532+HalcyonJAC@users.noreply.github.com> * Security/769 weak passwords allowed in reset form (#778) * Reset PW component with proper validation * check for valid action code * #771 Authentication Generic Errors (#775) * Display a generic erorr for wrong password or user not found * Update SignIn.vue replicating changes from local copy due to a 403 error * adding lodash as explicit dependency Co-authored-by: warrensearle <warren.searle@judicialappointments.digital> * #1289 Remove gaps in employment from non-legal exercises (#761) * inital changes * Update readme * remove commented code Co-authored-by: Warren Searle <warren@precise-minds.co.uk> * #1313 Location preferences (#777) * wip * wip * ranked choice changes * remove unrelated changes * remove padding * remove phantom checkbox * add to review page * remove from review page [wrong branch] Co-authored-by: warrensearle <warren.searle@judicialappointments.digital> * Workflow: on merge. Change develop to main branch * Bump version number to 1.40.0 * 517 Collect more detailed history of qualifying test responses - Save history - on Exit Modal - on information page - on review - on Situational Judgement - Save session - on skip - on SAve * [517] fix anlytics * [517] resolve conflict package-lock Co-authored-by: Lisias (Lee) Loback <lisias@loback.co.uk> Co-authored-by: Warren Searle <warren@precise-minds.co.uk> Co-authored-by: warrensearle <warren.searle@judicialappointments.digital> Co-authored-by: Tom Russell <TR115251@hotmail.co.uk> Co-authored-by: Maria Brookes <40855898+mbrookeswebdev@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Maria Brookes <maria_brookes@yahoo.co.uk> Co-authored-by: tomlovesgithub <44227249+tomlovesgithub@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: HalcyonJAC <79906532+HalcyonJAC@users.noreply.github.com>
What's included?
There were a few issues with the way that location preferences were being collected, to resolve this i've changed the interface for 'ranked-choice' type questions to be perceptive of one choice per rank.
This streamlines the way things work and negates the issues.
I've also added numbers to review page to show the rank given to each choice
Who should test?
✅ Product owner
✅ Developers
✅ UTG
How to test?
Risk - how likely is this to impact other areas?
🟠 Medium risk - I've done a sweep and tried to ensure the changes to ranked-choice will remain compatible with other places its used, from what i found there was only one other item using the ranked choice component. The issues with location preferences would have been present here too so i believe it should be okay.
Additional context
Include screen grabs, notes etc.
PREVIEW:DEVELOP