Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for validating EIP-4844 transactions #26

Closed
mpaulucci opened this issue Jun 13, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #140
Closed

Add support for validating EIP-4844 transactions #26

mpaulucci opened this issue Jun 13, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #140
Assignees
Labels
state-transition Issues related to execution and state calculation

Comments

@mpaulucci
Copy link
Collaborator

https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4844

@MegaRedHand MegaRedHand changed the title Add support for executing EIP-4844 transactions Add support for validating EIP-4844 transactions Jun 14, 2024
@MegaRedHand MegaRedHand added this to the Read-only RPC Node milestone Jun 14, 2024
@mpaulucci mpaulucci added the state-transition Issues related to execution and state calculation label Jun 18, 2024
@fmoletta fmoletta reopened this Jul 11, 2024
@fmoletta fmoletta moved this from Done to In Review in ethrex_l1 Jul 11, 2024
@fmoletta fmoletta self-assigned this Jul 11, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review to Done in ethrex_l1 Jul 12, 2024
mpaulucci pushed a commit to mpaulucci/lambda_ethereum_rust that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2024
This PR is based on lambdaclass#138 (as they modify the same code), please merge it
first

**Motivation**

Add support for EIP4844 transactions

<!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? -->

**Description**

Add `EIP4844` transactions + needed trait and methods and integrate it
into existing transaction-related code

<!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR
introduces -->

<!-- Link to issues: Resolves lambdaclass#111, Resolves lambdaclass#222 -->

Closes lambdaclass#26 (evm already performs validations before executing so adding
the transaction itself will sufice)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
state-transition Issues related to execution and state calculation
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants