-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: compute receipts root #111
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MegaRedHand
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 2, 2024
**Motivation** Replace evm code in eftests with an implementation that uses ethrex types **Description** * Implement `execute_tx` using revm * Move `evm` crate into `core` crate * Move `Transaction` into its own module * Implement multiple getters for `Transaction` fields * Implement address recovery from signed transactions * Implement conversions between ef tests types and ethrex types * Add one more ef test <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #21
the value must be rlp(receipt) instead of tx_type || rlp(receipt) (if tx_type != 0)
the previous way in which the receipts trie values were computed was the right way
MegaRedHand
reviewed
Jul 2, 2024
MegaRedHand
approved these changes
Jul 3, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
unbalancedparentheses
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 3, 2024
fmoletta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2024
MegaRedHand
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2024
**Motivation** Add support for EIP2930 transaction **Description** Implements EIP2930Transaction + required methods & traits <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes None, but will enable #135 to also close #24
fmoletta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2024
This PR is based on #138 (as they modify the same code), please merge it first **Motivation** Add support for EIP4844 transactions <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> **Description** Add `EIP4844` transactions + needed trait and methods and integrate it into existing transaction-related code <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #26 (evm already performs validations before executing so adding the transaction itself will sufice)
MegaRedHand
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2024
**Motivation** Add error handling to `execute_tx` and remove unwrap <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> **Description** Add `EvmError` Map revm's `EVMError` to `EvmError` Add error handling to `execute_tx` <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes None
MegaRedHand
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2024
**Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #125 --------- Co-authored-by: Tomás Grüner <47506558+MegaRedHand@users.noreply.github.com>
fmoletta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 16, 2024
**Motivation** Being able to store and fetch blocks from the db via `Store` api **Description** * Replace `Transaction::encode` with `Transaction::encode_with_type` logic (Reasoning: We cannot decode the transactions without knowing their type with the current behaviour, making it impossible to implement `RLPDecode` for `Transaction`) * Implement `RLPDecode` for `Transaction` (Using the logic that was previoulsy used in `EncodedTransaction::decode` (payload module)) * Implement `RLPDecode` for `Withdrawal`, `BlockHeader` and `BlockBody` * Add the folloewng methods to `Store` and `StoreEngine`: `add_block_header`, `add_block_body`, `get_block_header`, `get_block_body`, and implement them for `InMemory` and `Libmdbx` engine types <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes None, but is needed for #145
fmoletta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 16, 2024
**Motivation** Being able to serialize blocks matching the output required by the rpc spec <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> **Description** *Add struct `BlockSerializable` which can be serialized to match the specifications of the rpc. It can contain either the full transactions or just their hashes. *Implement serialization for `BlockSerializable`, `BlockHeader`, `BlockBody`, `Withdrawal` and `Transaction`. Other changes: *Replace `Bloom` with `ethereum_types::Bloom` *Rename some fields in `Eip1559Transaction` to match other transaction types' fields <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes None, but is needed in order to implement #31
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2025
**Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> Ref #1741 **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> Replaces specId with Fork - First change is in file `crates/vm/levm/src/environment.rs` - - Changes in other relevant files to accept the changes and fix cascading errors <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes [#1741](#1741) --------- Co-authored-by: Tomas Fabrizio Orsi <tomas.orsi@lambdaclass.com> Co-authored-by: Federico Borello <156438142+fborello-lambda@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: fborello-lambda <federicoborello@lambdaclass.com> Co-authored-by: Leandro Ferrigno <leanrafa@gmail.com>
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2025
**Motivation** This PR introduces the following upgrades for snap-sync: - Use DB-persisted checkpoints so we can persist the sync progress throughout restarts & cycles - Stop ForckChoices & NewPayloads being applied while syncing - Improved handling of stale pivot during sub-processes - Improved handling of pending requests when aborting due to stale pivot - Fetching of large storage tries (that don't fit in a single range request) - Safer (but a bit slower) healing that can be restarted - Faster storage fetching (multiple parallel fetches) And also simplifies it by removing the following logic: - No longer downloads bodies and receipts for blocks before the pivot during snap sync (WARNING: this goes against the spec but shouldn't be a problem for the time being) - Removes restart from latest block when latest - 64 becomes stale. (By this point it is more effective to wait for the next fork choice update) - Periodically shows state sync progress <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> **Description** - Stores the last downloaded block's hash in the DB during snap sync to serve as a checkpoint if the sync is aborted halfway (common case when syncing from genesis). This checkpoint is cleared upon succesful snap sync. - No longer fetches receipts or block bodies past the pivot block during snap sync - Add method `sync_status` which returns an enum with the current sync status (either Inactive, Active or Pending) and uses it in the ForkChoiceUpdate & NewPayload engine rpc endpoints so that we don't apply their logic during an active or pending sync. - Fetcher process now identify stale pivots and remain passive until they receive the end signal - Fetcher processes now return their current queue upon return so that it can be persisted into the next cycle - Stores the latest state root during state sync and healing as a checkpoint - Stores the last fetched key during state sync as a checkpoint - Healing no longer stores the nodes received via p2p, it instead inserts the leaf values and rebuilds it to avoid trie corruption between restarts. - The current progress percentage and estimated time to finish is periodically reported during state sync - Disables the following Paris & Cancun engine hive tests that previously yielded false positives due to new payloads being accepted on top of a syncing chain: * Invalid NewPayload (family) * Re-Org Back to Canonical Chain From Syncing Chain * Unknown HeadBlockHash * In-Order Consecutive Payload Execution (Flaky) * Valid NewPayload->ForkchoiceUpdated on Syncing Client * Invalid Missing Ancestor ReOrg * * Payload Build after New Invalid Payload (only Cancun) - And also disables the following tests that fail with the flag Syncing=true for the same reason : * Bad Hash on NewPayload * ParentHash equals BlockHash on NewPayload (only for Paris) * Invalid PayloadAttributes (family) Misc: - Replaces some noisy unwraps in networking module with errors - Applies annotated hacky fixes for problems reported in #1684 #1685 & #1686 <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes None <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #issue_number
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2025
**Motivation** Since the recently #1803 PR we now have new benchmarks. We need to modify the CI to make the comparison. I couldn't do that in the previous PR because since the new benchmarks were not in main yet, the CI would always fail. **Description** I will fix this in the next benchmark PR so we don't have to create 2 PRs for each new benchmark. <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 -->
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2025
**Motivation** There is no reason to attempt to resume a state sync if the previous cycle already moved on to healing, it could lead to corrupted state as the trie is currently being healed and in an inconsistent state <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> **Description** * Skip to healing if a previous cycle already completed state sync <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #issue_number
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2025
**Motivation** Adding more benchmarks to have an idea of how we fare vs other implementations and find possible improvements. **Description** We add a new benchmark: - `BubbleSort`: Creates an array of n random elements, sorts it via bubble-sort and then checks the array is sorted. <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 -->
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2025
…1828) **Motivation** Accounts are downloaded at a much faster pace compared to storages, causing bottlenecks in storage download. A previous PR sped up storage download by parallelizing requests but we still had many requests piling up in set ups with multiple peers. This PR aims to alleviate this issue by reading multiple incoming requests at once and avoid piling requests in the storage fetcher's receiver <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> **Description** * Read multiple messages at once from the storage fetcher's receiver channel during snap sync <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #issue_number
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2025
**Motivation** sync code should not be aware of how peers are handled and only care about what they ask the peer and what it returns to them. This PR aims to abstract peer handling logic into a `PeerHandler` so that sync code no longer has to care about finding a suitable peer and managing retries for failing requests. The `PeerHandler` api will provide request methods that return a suitable peer response unless there was no suitable peer or none of them returned a suitable response. This will also allow us to refactor peer code without affecting sync code & add other behaviors such as punishing peers that return invalid responses in the future <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> **Description** * Add `PeerHandler` abstraction (which will take over the request methods of `PeerChannels`) * Peer request methods now also find a suitable peer for the request and retry it if it fails * Removed peer selection & request retry logic from sync code <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #issue_number
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2025
**Motivation** This testnet is much newer than holesky, so It should allow us to test snap sync much faster <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #issue_number
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2025
… on beacon call (#1864) **Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> In this PR we change the check for doing the beacon root call to make it work for future forks begging in Cancun **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> Change the equal assertion of the fork to a greater or equal assertion <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 -->
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
**Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> This pull request introduces updates to the `blockchain` crate, primarily focusing on handling transactions and withdrawals when the `levm` feature is enabled. **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> ##### Dependency Management: * Added `ethrex-levm` as an optional dependency in `Cargo.toml` to support `levm` feature. * Updated the `levm` feature to include `ethrex-levm` in `Cargo.toml`. ##### Function Modifications: * Modified various functions in `payload.rs` to support `block_cache` when the `levm` feature is enabled: * `build_payload` now initializes and passes `block_cache` through the transaction processing pipeline. * `apply_withdrawals` returns a `block_cache` and updates state based on the `levm` feature. * `fill_transactions` and its helper functions (`apply_transaction`, `apply_blob_transaction`, `apply_plain_transaction`) now accept and update `block_cache`. * `finalize_payload` updates the state root and other headers using `block_cache` when the `levm` feature is enabled. ##### Code Organization: * Added conditional imports for `levm` feature in `payload.rs` to ensure compatibility and proper functionality. <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #1777 --------- Co-authored-by: Tomas Fabrizio Orsi <tomas.orsi@lambdaclass.com> Co-authored-by: Ivan Litteri <67517699+ilitteri@users.noreply.github.com>
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
…ng a known network (#1866) **Motivation** When we use a known network name as a `--network` argument we should not ignore the boot nodes passed though the command line but instead extend them with the preset bootnodes. <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> **Description** * Extends current bootnodes with preset boot nodes instead of replacing them when running a preset network * Documents preset networks feature in cli documentation <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #issue_number
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
**Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> This PR fix the last test of the regression when using LEVM with the feature flag. **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> ### Enhancements to nonce handling: * Added a `tx_nonce` field to the `Environment` struct . * Introduced a new `NonceMismatch` variant in the `TxValidationError` enum to handle nonce mismatch errors. * Added check for mismatch nonce value in the `prepare_execution`. <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #1865 --------- Co-authored-by: Tomas Fabrizio Orsi <tomas.orsi@lambdaclass.com>
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
**Motivation** Reverts the "slow but safe" approach to healing taken by #1763 and instead adds the intermediate nodes received from peers to the trie. <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> **Description** * Write nodes fetched during healing to the state instead of writing only leaf values * Track paths left in queue when a healing cycle ends due to pivot staleness * Condense snap checkpoint clearing to one single method * (Misc) Move some noisy p2p info tracing to debug * (Fix) When executing full blocks after the pivot block during snap sync execute the block first before setting it as canonical <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> **Comments** A not so pretty solution was implemented on the storage_healer (the startup flag) to avoid blocking storage healing at the start. This can and will be improved but doing so in this PR is not worth it when follow up PRs will already touch up on this logic when parallelizing storage node fetching (similar to storage ranges) **Testing** This proved to work fine in `Mekong` testnet when introducing forced sleeps and delays to force healing. But it is still too slow to work on Holesky testnet, this should improve once we add more parallelization to state sync & healing Closes #issue_number
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2025
…1872) **Motivation** Spawn multiple concurrent fetch processes for state & storage nodes (similar to storage ranges) in order to speed up healing phase. <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> **Description** * Add `MAX_PARALLEL_FETCHES` constant to limit and customize how many concurrent fetch processes can be spawned at a time when fetching storage ranges, state nodes and storage nodes * Spawn multiple sub-processes at a time to fetch state & storage nodes * Use `recv_many` on the storage healer to avoid piling up storage heal requests <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #issue_number
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2025
**Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> This pull request introduces changes to the Ethereum Foundation (EF) test framework, specifically enhancing the handling of forks within the test reports. The changes include modifications to the deserialization process, test report structure, and test runner logic to support multiple forks. **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> * `cmd/ef_tests/levm/report.rs`: Refactored `EFTestReport` to include `fork_results` instead of a single `fork` field. Introduced `EFTestReportForkResult` to encapsulate fork-specific results. Updated methods to handle the new structure and ensure correct reporting of test results per fork. * `cmd/ef_tests/levm/runner/levm_runner.rs`: Updated the `run_ef_test` and `run_ef_test_tx` functions to iterate over forks and handle fork-specific test execution. Adjusted `prepare_vm_for_tx` and `ensure_post_state` functions to accept a `fork` parameter. * `cmd/ef_tests/levm/runner/mod.rs`: Handled cases where test hashes might be missing to prevent panics. * `cmd/ef_tests/levm/runner/revm_runner.rs`: Updated imports to include `EFTestReportForkResult`. Closes #1701
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2025
**Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> This pull request includes updates to the `crates/blockchain/payload.rs` file, grouping the withdrawal for the different evm implementations. Additionally, there are minor changes in `crates/vm/vm.rs` related to state transitions. **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> * Added a new function `make_beacon_root_call` to handle beacon root contract calls within the `build_payload` function. * Removed withdrawal processing code from the `finalize_payload` function, as it is now handled within the `apply_withdrawals` function. * Updated the `apply_plain_transaction` function to use `get_state_transitions_levm` for account updates, ensuring consistency with the new beacon root call integration. <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> --------- Co-authored-by: Francisco Krause Arnim <56402156+fkrause98@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Federico Borello <156438142+fborello-lambda@users.noreply.github.com>
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2025
**Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> In this PR, part of the gas cost that were in the pre berlin forks are added. **Description** * Added constants for pre-Berlin fork gas costs: `SLOAD_COST_PRE_BERLIN`, `SSTORE_PRE_BERLIN_NON_ZERO`, `SSTORE_PRE_BERLIN`, and `ADDRESS_COST_PRE_BERLIN` in `crates/vm/levm/src/gas_cost.rs`. * Updated `sload`, `sstore`, `address_access_cost`, `balance`, `extcodesize`, `extcodecopy`, `extcodehash`, `call`, `callcode`, `delegatecall`, and `staticcall` functions to include the `Fork` parameter and handle pre-Berlin gas costs. * Updated `balance`, `extcodesize`, `extcodecopy`, `extcodehash`, `sload`, `sstore`, `call`, `callcode`, `delegatecall`, and `staticcall` function calls to pass the `Fork` parameter in `crates/vm/levm/src/opcode_handlers/environment.rs`, `stack_memory_storage_flow.rs`, and `system.rs`. <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 -->
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2025
**Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> In this PR we solved the wrong ef tests summaries due to incorrect fork parsing **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> We change the `"ConstantinopleFix"` to be parsed as the `Petersburg` fork, instead of the `Constantinople` <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 -->
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2025
**Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> In this PR we add support for the `eip3651_warm_coinbase` test suite. **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> Change the cold/warm cost for `balance` and `extcodesize` of the [eip-2929](https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2929.md#storage-read-changes) to be on forks after Berlin and not after Cancun. <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #1916
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2025
**Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> In this PR we add support for the `stArgsZeroOneBalance` test suite. **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> * We implement the change in the London fork of the quotient in the gas refund. * We remove the cost of cold addresses in the `selfdestruct` opcode for pre Berlin forks. * We add the gas refund in the `selfdestruct` for pre London forks. <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #1907
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2025
**Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> In this PR we make the stBug test suite pass. **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> * We introduce a gas refund of 24000 from the `sstore` opcode to pre Istanbul forks * We take correct gas cost in the `extCodeHash` opcode of 400 to pre Istanbul forks <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #1920
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2025
**Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> In this PR we add support for the `yul` and `stSStoreTest` test suite. **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> * We change and incorrect check of the fork Berlin. Previously it was inclusive when it should be exclusive. * We make a correct gas charge in the `get_intrinsic_gas` function. In a Create type transaction, 2 gas per 32-byte words must be charged in order to follow [EIP-3860](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3860) but only in Shanghai or later forks <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #1938
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2025
**Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> In this PR we add increase the test passed in the `stCreate2` test suite **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> * We add the correct values for the `ecadd`, `ecmul` and `ecpairing` precompiles to pre Istanbul forks. This is stated [here](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1108) * We invalidate transactions with the opcode `create2` on forks previous to Constantinople, see [here](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1014) <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #1941
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2025
…1899) **Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> In this PR we increase the test passed in the `stDelegatecallTestHomestead` test suite. **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> * We add the pre tangerine gas costs for `sload`, `selfdestruct` and `extcodecopy`. * We now don't apply the "all but one 64th" introduced in the [eip-150](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-150). * We invalidate the transaction if we use a `delegatecall` opcode introduced in [eip-7](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7) for previous forks to Homestead. * We add on previous fork to Spurious Dragon to set the nonce to 0 instead of 1. This is due to [eip-161](https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-161.md). <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #1886
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2025
**Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> In this PR we add the check to not refund gas on accounts that belongs to the selfdestruct set. **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> We add a prior check on the gas refund to the account that receives the gas refund to not be in the `selfdestruct_set` <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 -->
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2025
**Motivation** Updates snap sync documentation to reflect changes up to #1936, please merge it first <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> **Description** * Update snap sync documentation with latest changes <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #issue_number
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2025
…orage healing (#1936) **Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> Currently, snap sync is working fine on small networks and local test environments but it is still too slow to catch up to a larger network such as holesky and sepolia. This PR aims to speed up the state sync phase by dividing the account state and spawning multiple processes to fetch multiple sections of the state at the same time. While working on this PR I also noticed that the trie rebuild time is quite significant so this PR also includes rebuilding the state & storage tries in a permanent background process while the state sync is active. The PR also includes starting storage healing earlier for those storages that are left in the fetcher's queue when the pivot becomes stale. This change should alleviate the workload of the storage healer in the post-state sync healing phase. **Description** ***State Sync Paralellization*** - Create Snapshot DB tables to store fetched accounts and storages during state sync - Write accounts to the snapshot instead of the tries during state sync - Divide the account state into N segments and fetch all segments at the same time (The number of segments is currently set to 2 but can be adjusted by changing a constant in the storage module) ***Trie Rebuild in Background*** - Add a background state trie rebuild process that will continuously try to rebuild the state trie by reading the latest accounts from the state snapshot, finishing when state sync is finished and there are no more accounts in the state snapshot - Add a background storage trie rebuild process that will listen for incoming messages from the storage fetcher, which will advertise storages that have been fully fetched, and rebuild the full storage tries. It will end when state sync has finished and no more storages are left in queue. - Pass a `CancellationToken` to the background rebuild processes so that they will not be stuck when taking down the node via Ctr+C ***Early Healing*** - The storage healer will be spawned before state sync as opposed to after. - A sender to the storage healer's channel will be passed to the storage fetcher so that it can send unfetched storages after a stale pivot is detected. <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #issue_number
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2025
…mpiledContracts2` (#1969) **Motivation** <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> In this PR we check if the fork is enabled to execute precompiles and implement the gas cost for the `call` opcode in [EIP-161](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-161) **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> * In the Fork Byzantium the precompiles `modexp`, `ecadd`, `ecmul` and `ecpairing` are introduced. In the previous forks this precompiles must be disable. * For the `call` opcode in the previous forks to Spurious Dragon, the empty account cost only checks for the account to be empty. On Spurious Dragon and after, the value to send must be non zero to be charged with the gas cost. <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> The current state is: * `stPreCompiledContracts: 298/299 (99.67%)` * `stPreCompiledContracts2: 648/762 (85.04%)` --------- Co-authored-by: Tomas Fabrizio Orsi <tomas.orsi@lambdaclass.com> Co-authored-by: Federico Borello <156438142+fborello-lambda@users.noreply.github.com>
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2025
…#1961) **Motivation** The code for sync has grown significantly since its start, and having it all under the same module can make it very hard to follow. This PR aims to solve this by separating each different job into different modules and adding module-level documentation for each, explaining how each part of the sync works and integrates to the system as a whole <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> **Description** * Separate sync code into different modules, one for each separate functionality * Add doc comments for each individual module explaining its purpose and mechanics <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Notes for merging: This PR will likely conflict with #1936 but it has the same exact code, only moving it across modules, so it should be safe to solve all conflicts by keeping the changes from this PR alone. Alternatively, you can also merge this PR into #1936 as it has no conflicts and then merge #1936 --------- Co-authored-by: Martin Paulucci <martin.c.paulucci@gmail.com>
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2025
**Motivation** This PR introduces a `CommonBridgeL2` system contract (that comes with the L2 genesis) at address `0x000000000000000000000000000000000000FFFF` that handles withdrawals. To issue a withdraw, users simply send a transaction to the `withdraw` function with the address of the account that will claim the funds on L1. This was done because the previous approach to withdrawals was extremely hacky and error prone, issuing a transaction to the L1 address that would claim, that was then internally changed to the zero address before vm execution. This approach is a lot simpler and does not require any hackyness of that kind. **Description** <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #issue_number
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #106